★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>TABULATION. Attributives Simple x Qualified</head><lb/> | <head>TABULATION. Attributives Simple x Qualified</head><lb/> | ||
The <del>words <gap/></del> attributives employ'd in<lb/> | The <del>words <gap/></del> attributives employ'd in<lb/> | ||
this method of Tabulation, may be either<lb/> | this method of Tabulation, may be either<lb/> | ||
Simple, or < | Simple, or <add>as it will</add> <del>qualified</del> much more frequently happen, qualified<lb/> | ||
Example<lb/> | Example<lb/> | ||
<add>Thus</add> The word ["attributive"] < | <add>Thus</add> The word ["attributive"] <add>still</add> in the example to which<lb/> | ||
we still adhere from the Hermes, having stood<lb/> | we still adhere from the Hermes, having stood<lb/> | ||
<hi rend='superscript'>in the form of an attribution</hi> as a predicate to what next < | <hi rend='superscript'>in the form of an attribution</hi> as a predicate to what next <add>inferior</add> <del>superior</del> Point,<lb/> | ||
now assumes the < | now assumes the <add>Grammatical</add> office of <del><gap/></del> a Substantive & <lb/> | ||
the Logical use of a Subject to other attributives<lb/> | the Logical use of a Subject to other attributives<lb/> | ||
predic<del>ated</del> of it in <sic>it's</sic> turn.<lb/> | predic<del>ated</del> of it in <sic>it's</sic> turn.<lb/> | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
<note>There a Mathematician might perhaps be better pleased to distinguish be the appellations of simple & <!-- Not sure of the symbol after the ampersand. Is it the same X-like sign that appears in the heading Simple x Qualified? What is meant by it?--><hi rend="underline">affected.</hi></note> | <note>There a Mathematician might perhaps be better pleased to distinguish be the appellations of simple & <!-- Not sure of the symbol after the ampersand. Is it the same X-like sign that appears in the heading Simple x Qualified? What is meant by it?--><hi rend="underline">affected.</hi></note> | ||
These in the 1<hi rend="superscript">st</hi> of its next < | <p>These in the 1<hi rend="superscript">st</hi> of its next <add>superior</add> <gap/> inferior<lb/> | ||
Branches the attributives < | Branches the attributives <add>"Signicative"</add> &<lb/> | ||
<hi rend="underline">"inclusive"</hi> < | <hi rend="underline">"inclusive"</hi> <add>coupled by a conjunction</add> in the 2<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> of them Not-inclusives —<lb/> | ||
But Significative of what? Inclusive<lb/> | But Significative of what? Inclusive<lb/> | ||
of what? Not-inclusive of what? Not <hi rend="underline">Significative</hi><lb/> | of what? Not-inclusive of what? Not <hi rend="underline">Significative</hi><lb/> | ||
<hi rend="underline">of <sic>any thing,</sic></hi> Inclusive of <sic>any thing,</sic> Not inclusive<lb/> | <hi rend="underline">of <sic>any thing,</sic></hi> Inclusive of <sic>any thing,</sic> Not inclusive<lb/> | ||
of <sic>any thing,</sic> as would be the case if<lb/> | of <sic>any thing,</sic> as would be the case if<lb/> | ||
the < | the <add>several</add> Attributives were <hi rend="underline">simple</hi> but (<unclear>in</unclear> the<lb/> | ||
<unclear>first</unclear> Branch) significative <del>attributives</del> < | <unclear>first</unclear> Branch) significative <del>attributives</del> <add>of certain</add> <unclear>particu</unclear><lb/></p> | ||
TABULATION. Attributives Simple x Qualified
The words attributives employ'd in
this method of Tabulation, may be either
Simple, or as it will qualified much more frequently happen, qualified
Example
Thus The word ["attributive"] still in the example to which
we still adhere from the Hermes, having stood
in the form of an attribution as a predicate to what next inferior superior Point,
now assumes the Grammatical office of a Substantive &
the Logical use of a Subject to other attributives
predicated of it in it's turn.
There a Mathematician might perhaps be better pleased to distinguish be the appellations of simple & affected.
These in the 1st of its next superior inferior
Branches the attributives "Signicative" &
"inclusive" coupled by a conjunction in the 2d of them Not-inclusives —
But Significative of what? Inclusive
of what? Not-inclusive of what? Not Significative
of any thing, Inclusive of any thing, Not inclusive
of any thing, as would be the case if
the several Attributives were simple but (in the
first Branch) significative attributives of certain particu
|
Identifier: | JB/070/156/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 70. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
070 |
of laws in general |
||
|
156 |
tabulation. attributives simple & qualified |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
|||
|
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::[partial lion with vryheyt motif]]] |
||
|
23271 |
|||
