★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
fee is in the Archbishoprick of | fee is in the Archbishoprick of York: Earl Spencer is<lb/>Lessee only for lives<lb/><note>Under which <gap/> <lb/>think I flatter myself <lb/>you will hardly think <lb/>it necessary <add>the intimation of</add> your decision <lb/>should wait for the <lb/>proof of them.</note><lb/>2. Were there legal to dispose of the land on such<lb/>terms, the supposition of <add>a probability of</add> finding persons to take it on<lb/>such terms is a mistaken one, dusproved by fact.<lb/>The nearest spot to <del>it</del> <add>capable</add> physically <del>capable</del> speaking of<lb/>such an application is a piece of ground belonging<lb/>to M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> <gap/> (the Bookseller in Cornhill) being a <add>on the</add> contination <lb/><add>same</add> <del>of the</del> elevation and <add>separated only by a <gap/></add> and <del><gap/></del> <add>possesssing</add> the same prospect.<lb/>M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> <gap/> for several years advertized <del>it</del> to this ground<lb/>of his to be let on building leases on a plan of M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi><lb/>Leverton's . <add>and kept boards up.</add> Nobody applied, and the project has for<lb/>some time been given up as hopeless. Close to M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi><lb/><gap/>'s is another piece of ground possessed of the same<lb/>advantages. The proprietor, as M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> <gap/> informed <lb/>me had made similar attempts: but<lb/>proved equally abortive.<lb/>The notion with respect to letting the land on building<lb/>leases, being the suggestion of gentlemen having <add>having villas</add> at Clapham<lb/>is evidently taken from the state of things in their neighbourhood.<lb/>But, Clapham is, and in particular the<lb/>houses of the gentlemen in question are a mile off.<lb/><note>240<lb/>30<lb/>7200</note><lb/><lb/>Building Leases out of the question, no part of <lb/>the land lets for more than L 3 an acre: a considerable<lb/>part, <del>I believe</del> the greater <add>(I believe)</add>, for not so much.<lb/>M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> <gap/>, who being tenant in fee is aat full liberty to<lb/>make the most of his ground, can not get above<lb/>forty odd shillings <add>for it</add> (I think it is 45<hi rend="superscript">s</hi>)<lb/>Were the whole of the land let at L3,<lb/><gap/> of 80 acres L 240: else at L30<lb/>year purchase would be - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - 7200<lb/> | ||
<note>If such be the case, <lb/>the <add>employing</add> instituting an <lb/>inquiry with regard <lb/>to collateral matters <lb/>of fact, such as those <lb/>intimated by the allegations <lb/><gap/> <lb/>the queries <del>would</del> <lb/>will be as useless <lb/>as</note><lb/> | |||
<pb/> | |||
fee is in the Archbishoprick of York: Earl Spencer is
Lessee only for lives
Under which
think I flatter myself
you will hardly think
it necessary the intimation of your decision
should wait for the
proof of them.
2. Were there legal to dispose of the land on such
terms, the supposition of a probability of finding persons to take it on
such terms is a mistaken one, dusproved by fact.
The nearest spot to it capable physically capable speaking of
such an application is a piece of ground belonging
to Mr (the Bookseller in Cornhill) being a on the contination
same of the elevation and separated only by a and possesssing the same prospect.
Mr for several years advertized it to this ground
of his to be let on building leases on a plan of Mr
Leverton's . and kept boards up. Nobody applied, and the project has for
some time been given up as hopeless. Close to Mr
's is another piece of ground possessed of the same
advantages. The proprietor, as Mr informed
me had made similar attempts: but
proved equally abortive.
The notion with respect to letting the land on building
leases, being the suggestion of gentlemen having having villas at Clapham
is evidently taken from the state of things in their neighbourhood.
But, Clapham is, and in particular the
houses of the gentlemen in question are a mile off.
240
30
7200
Building Leases out of the question, no part of
the land lets for more than L 3 an acre: a considerable
part, I believe the greater (I believe), for not so much.
Mr , who being tenant in fee is aat full liberty to
make the most of his ground, can not get above
forty odd shillings for it (I think it is 45s)
Were the whole of the land let at L3,
of 80 acres L 240: else at L30
year purchase would be - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - 7200
If such be the case,
the employing instituting an
inquiry with regard
to collateral matters
of fact, such as those
intimated by the allegations
the queries would
will be as useless
as
---page break---
|
Identifier: | JB/541/592/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 541. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1794-??-?? |
|||
|
541 |
|||
|
592 |
|||
|
002 |
|||
|
Correspondence |
|||
|
Jeremy Bentham |
|||
