JB/050/043/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/050/043/001: Difference between revisions

Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:
<note>v. Burn I 503.3.</note>  
<note>v. Burn I 503.3.</note>  
to the degrees of probability, it should be this.</p>
to the degrees of probability, it should be this.</p>
<p><hi rend="underline">Full</hi> Proof is that, which, the wwitness being believed, <lb/>
<p><hi rend="underline">Full</hi> Proof is that, which, the witness being believed, <lb/>
<sic>admitts</sic> not of the probability of Innocence.</p>
<sic>admitts</sic> not of the probability of Innocence.</p>
<add>cannot by be true</add>As if W. defenses that he saw <gap/><lb/>
<p><add>cannot by be true</add>As if W. deposes that he saw Dr<lb/>
ran through the body by A. alone, I presumably expire.<lb/>
ran through the body by A. alone, &amp; presumably expire.<lb/>
<note>+ or <unclear>Providentially</unclear></note> Proof <hi rend="underline">Violable</hi> <hi rend="superscript">+</hi> <hi rend="underline">Presumptive</hi> is that, which is of itself insufficient <lb/>
<note><add>+</add> or <unclear>Sufficiently</unclear></note> Proof <hi rend="underline">Violently</hi> <hi rend="superscript">+</hi> <hi rend="underline">Presumptive</hi> is that, which is of itself sufficient <lb/>
to convert, if nothing on the opposite side <unclear>opposes</unclear>, which<lb/>
to convict, if nothing on the opposite side appears, which<lb/>
<note>A- accorded D. deceased W. Writings</note> then may do by probability, so as that the testimony of<lb/>
<note>A- accorded <lb/>
this 1<hi rend="superscript">st</hi> may <unclear>drill</unclear> <del>not</del> <add>continue</add> true. As if, (to take the  <unclear>interview</unclear><lb/>
Dc deceased <lb/>
given by <unclear>R. Clarke</unclear>) to be found run through the body<lb/>
W. Witness.</note> then may do by possibility, so as that the testimony of<lb/>
with a <unclear>hand</unclear>, and a <unclear>offense</unclear>. As it is seen to come <unclear>outside</unclear><lb/>
this 1<hi rend="superscript">st</hi> may still <del>not</del> <add>continue</add> true - As if, (to take the  <unclear>instance</unclear><lb/>
that Home, with a Bloody Sword, if no other man <hi rend="underline">was</hi><lb/>
given by <unclear>D<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Coke</unclear>) &amp;c be found run through the body<lb/>
as that <unclear>??</unclear> in the House. These <unclear>??</unclear><lb/>
with a Sword, in a House. &amp; As is seen to come out of<lb/>
<add>ruled by W.</add> standing alone might form a presumption sufficiently<lb/>
that House, with a bloody Sword, &amp; no other man <hi rend="underline">was</hi><lb/>
strong for it to be commented. And yet things and <unclear>??</unclear><lb/>
as that time in the House - These circumstances<lb/>
of explanation <unclear>commit ably</unclear> <add>both</add> on the one hand with A's<lb/>
<add>related by W.</add> standing alone might form a presumption sufficiently<lb/>
imminence &amp; on the other with W. veracity.  For it<lb/>
strong for A. to be convicted - And yet things are capable<lb/>
may be that <unclear>He</unclear> did it himself, &amp; A. his friend <unclear>introducing</unclear> the<lb/>
of explanation consistently <add>both</add> on the one hand with A's<lb/>
Sword out of the Body run out of the House in a fit of<lb/>
innocence &amp; on the other with W<hi rend="superscript"><hi rend="underline">s</hi></hi> veracity.  For it<lb/>
may be that <unclear>K.</unclear> did it himself, &amp; A. <add>his friend</add> snatching the<lb/>
Sword out of the Body ran out of the House in a fit of<lb/>
distraction; as may be proved <hi rend="underline">fully</hi> by another W. who<lb/>
distraction; as may be proved <hi rend="underline">fully</hi> by another W. who<lb/>
heard A. expostulating with D. on his design, or <unclear>purposes</unclear>.
heard A. expostulating with D. on his design, or <unclear>preseump<hi rend="superscript">n</hi></unclear>.</p><pb/>





Revision as of 17:14, 30 August 2015

Click Here To Edit CERTAINTY EVIDENCE - Degrees of force

If I were to exhibit a division of Prudence according
v. Burn I 503.3. to the degrees of probability, it should be this.

Full Proof is that, which, the witness being believed,
admitts not of the probability of Innocence.

cannot by be trueAs if W. deposes that he saw Dr
ran through the body by A. alone, & presumably expire.
+ or Sufficiently Proof Violently + Presumptive is that, which is of itself sufficient
to convict, if nothing on the opposite side appears, which
A- accorded
Dc deceased
W. Witness.
then may do by possibility, so as that the testimony of
this 1st may still not continue true - As if, (to take the instance
given by Dr Coke) &c be found run through the body
with a Sword, in a House. & As is seen to come out of
that House, with a bloody Sword, & no other man was
as that time in the House - These circumstances
related by W. standing alone might form a presumption sufficiently
strong for A. to be convicted - And yet things are capable
of explanation consistently both on the one hand with A's
innocence & on the other with W<hi rend="underline">s</hi> veracity. For it
may be that K. did it himself, & A. his friend snatching the
Sword out of the Body ran out of the House in a fit of
distraction; as may be proved fully by another W. who
heard A. expostulating with D. on his design, or preseumpn.


---page break---






Identifier: | JB/050/043/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 50.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

050

Main Headings

procedure code

Folio number

043

Info in main headings field

certainty evidence - degrees of force

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f1

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[partial ec motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

16034

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in