JB/050/081/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/050/081/001: Difference between revisions

Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 48: Line 48:
were nott so confined as they now <lb/>
were nott so confined as they now <lb/>
are since the establishment of a regular<lb/>
are since the establishment of a regular<lb/>
Lagislation) instead of the proof of the <gap/ulaton<lb/>
Legislation) instead of the proof of the <gap/ulaton<lb/>
of the bad coin, which alone<lb/>
of the bad coin, which alone<lb/>
it is that in fact producing the mischief. </note>
it is that in fact producing the mischief. </note>
Line 57: Line 57:
because their opinions cannot (as well as Judges opinions <gap/><lb/>
because their opinions cannot (as well as Judges opinions <gap/><lb/>
some &amp; as a <gap/> for future &amp; in case <del><gap/> <gap/></del></add> or if there be it is <note>of <gap/> committed of the like kind</note><lb/>
some &amp; as a <gap/> for future &amp; in case <del><gap/> <gap/></del></add> or if there be it is <note>of <gap/> committed of the like kind</note><lb/>
 
obviously is that even simple men are not likely to fail <add>mistake</add> of <unclear>promising
 
</unclear> it, &amp; therefore <sic>thi</sic><add>ago</add><lb/>
 
Judges ought not because they need not; or else<add>lastly</add> the conviction tho' necessary is so remote <add>+</add>, the <note>The Law may perhaps <add>be admitted to doubt</add> decide<lb/>
 
that such a thing shall not be <lb/>
evidence to the effect  that <del>upon</del><add>the</add><lb/>
Jury shall not upon the <unclear>evidit</unclear><lb/>of it find their verdict, because it may prevent <sic>it's</sic>being afford<lb/>
to them. but it may not to <lb/>
<sic>ecide</sic> that such a thing shall be evidence, to the effect that the Jury <hi rend="underline">shall</hi> upon the credit of it found their verdict <add>when</add><lb/>
it is affer'd them, because that  would be annihilating their office.</note>





Revision as of 08:52, 6 September 2015

Click Here To Edit


CERTAINTY. PROCEDURE. LAW & FACT.

It is right of advantage that the power of deciding on questions of law, & the power of deciding on
the question of fact, should be vested in separate hands: if those two powers are confou
in the hands of those to whom the latter power alone properly belongs

If in the hands of those to whom the former appertains the restraint is gone which cons
in the consciousness that the Law declared against this or that man invest beLaw
against all other and themselves -. what


What verges towards this inconvenience is the habit of too minute generalisatings axiomatization
stretching the bounds of Law too far, whereby it happens that the rules laid dow
are so narrow as not scarce to take in any more others than the precise case on the occasion ofwhich occasioned there
which they were pronounced. - This as to the arbitrary <unclear>power it gives to the Judge, is in it gives to partialitotics may become
tantamount to the power of determination of the matter of fact superadded to that of Law.

The power of the share taken by Jury in the complex decision secures [to] it it's aception among with
the people - The Legislative definition<add>declaration according to which it is framed whereby it is guided</add>unclear>prev</unclear> definitive power of the Legislation] [supplied where def dificient
by the Judges, Court it's uniformity with the rest of the system i:e: it's general relative ability; th
power of the Judges of setting it aside & sending the question to be retried, it's particular pa
utility.


When you have compleatedperfected your definition of the C so as (as near as inmay be
to take in all the mischief and nothing more than the mischief then have yo
done all that there is for the Law to do — The Judge has nothing mor
to do (and surely it is enough) than to superintend the order - and conduct of the procee-ding
to keep the Council within their duty, to interrogate the living witnesses where re thinks
proper, to examine & explain the dead inanimate evidence, to sum up the whole evidence
together to remark in it for the assistance of the Jury, the strong the weak, what <add>he thinks</add>strong <add>in the one</add> what i
the what on the other side, & what ambiguous - all this preparatory to the verdict - after it, in another plplace:
to give his 2 vote and 1opinion at least his opinion, if he is not satisfied with it for
the setting of it aside.

+ Explain this further - this is
the case of coining the proof of which
has been from the very first substituted
by the Law (indeed the common Law
but there a Law the powers of those
where decisions made Common Law
were nott so confined as they now
are since the establishment of a regular
Legislation) instead of the proof of the <gap/ulaton
of the bad coin, which alone
it is that in fact producing the mischief.

All questions of intention are questions of fact: because either there is as fac
the connexion of which with a certain intention is absolutely necessary, & thereforestandingst
alone it ought not to be madein all case conclusive of each intention, And therefore Judges ought not to decide concerning the
because their opinions cannot (as well as Judges opinions
some & as a for future & in case
or if there be it is of committed of the like kind
obviously is that even simple men are not likely to fail mistake of promising it, & therefore thiago
Judges ought not because they need not; or elselastly the conviction tho' necessary is so remote +, the The Law may perhaps be admitted to doubt decide
that such a thing shall not be
evidence to the effect that uponthe
Jury shall not upon the evidit
of it find their verdict, because it may prevent it'sbeing afford
to them. but it may not to
ecide that such a thing shall be evidence, to the effect that the Jury shall upon the credit of it found their verdict when
it is affer'd them, because that would be annihilating their office.











Identifier: | JB/050/081/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 50.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

050

Main Headings

procedure code

Folio number

081

Info in main headings field

certainty procedure law & fact

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c1

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [britannia with shield motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

16072

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in