JB/115/120/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/115/120/001: Difference between revisions

Yelbuh (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Yelbuh (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/115/120/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/115/120/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->D.L.P. 8 Aug, 1795<lb/>Sir<lb/><p>Permit me to state to you the light in which<lb/>I have all along understood the matter now in doubt.<lb/><del>should M<hi rend='superscript'>r</hi> Pitt, after calling to mind the <unclear>intervening</unclear>incidents</del> if in the opinion of M<hi rend='superscript'>r</hi> Pitt, it can not<lb/>in justice to the public be understood in that light,<lb/>I submit to his decision without reserve.<</p>lb/><p>The basis of my proposal was what I <add>then</add> understood<lb/>to be the <gap/> price - <add>for a thousand <gap/> <gap/>L27,000.</add> Give me, said I, that price<lb/>for the first year, every year after I will do the business<lb/>at a reduced price [L12,000]. Expense of<lb/>building I take upon myself.</p><lb/><unclear><p>Requiring</unclear>M<hi rend='superscript'>r</hi><sic>Campbel's</sic> price for one year, but<lb/>for one year only, what idea could I have that<lb/>my representations should be expected to <del><gap/></del><add>account for</add> a<lb/>single penny of it, any more than <del>that M<hi rend='superscript'>r</hi>Campbels<lb/>representations should <del><gap/></del><add><del>account for</del></add> the allowance made <gap/><lb/>to him?</del> <add>his for the price<lb/>received by him? </add> What if I had required the same price for<lb/>half a dozen years, or <del>all along</del> for the whole term?<lb/>Could I suppose that I was to fare <add>the</add> worse for making<lb/>the abatement so much the sooner?</p><lb/>M<hi rend='superscript'>r</hi>Campbel's first price was L 38 a head:<lb/>[=L 38,000] Then <del><gap/> more</del> <add>were <gap/></add>reason, why <del><gap/></del><add>in my instance the</add> first price<lb/>would <gap/> the subsequent one, still more. After the  
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->D.L.P. 8 Aug, 1795<lb/>Sir<lb/><p>Permit me to state to you the light in which<lb/>I have all along understood the matter now in doubt.<lb/><del>should M<hi rend='superscript'>r</hi> Pitt, after calling to mind the <unclear>intervening</unclear>incidents</del> if in the opinion of M<hi rend='superscript'>r</hi> Pitt, it can not<lb/>in justice to the public be understood in that light,<lb/>I submit to his decision without reserve.<</p>lb/><p>The basis of my proposal was what I <add>then</add> understood<lb/>to be the <gap/> price - <add>for a thousand <gap/> <gap/>L27,000.</add> Give me, said I, that price<lb/>for the first year, every year after I will do the business<lb/>at a reduced price [L12,000]. Expense of<lb/>building I take upon myself.</p><lb/><unclear><p>Requiring</unclear>M<hi rend='superscript'>r</hi><sic>Campbel's</sic> price for one year, but<lb/>for one year only, what idea could I have that<lb/>my representations should be expected to <del><gap/></del><add>account for</add> a<lb/>single penny of it, any more than <del>that M<hi rend='superscript'>r</hi>Campbels<lb/>representations should <del><gap/></del><add><del>account for</del></add> the allowance made <gap/><lb/>to him?</del> <add>his for the price<lb/>received by him? </add> What if I had required the same price for<lb/>half a dozen years, or <del>all along</del> for the whole term?<lb/>Could I suppose that I was to fare <add>the</add> worse for making<lb/>the abatement so much the sooner?</p><lb/>M<hi rend='superscript'>r</hi>Campbel's first price was L 38 a head:<lb/>[=L 38,000] Then <del><gap/> more</del> <add>were <gap/></add>reason, why <del><gap/></del><add>in my instance the</add> first price<lb/>would <gap/> the subsequent one, still more <add><gap/> is his, that without adverting to the building.</add> After the first<lb/>year <add><gap/></add> the labour too may be reckoned upon <del><gap/> <gap/> to become productive</del>: for <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> the first year very little <del>or nothing</del> <del><gap/>.</del> <add>can</add> be depended upon on the advantage of<lb/>that <del>account</del> score.<p>paragraph</p><lb/><del>Further business</del>It could not <unclear>surely</unclear> be supposed that I meant to keep up the establishment for nothing any year: still less this <add><unclear>first</unclear> <unclear>+</unclear></add>heaviest of<lb/>all years. What <unclear>less</unclear> then could I be supposed to expect <gap/> the whole was requiring for that <gap/> <gap/> 




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 18:20, 18 February 2011

Click Here To Edit

D.L.P. 8 Aug, 1795
Sir

Permit me to state to you the light in which
I have all along understood the matter now in doubt.
should Mr Pitt, after calling to mind the interveningincidents if in the opinion of Mr Pitt, it can not
in justice to the public be understood in that light,
I submit to his decision without reserve.<

lb/>

The basis of my proposal was what I then understood
to be the price - for a thousand L27,000. Give me, said I, that price
for the first year, every year after I will do the business
at a reduced price [L12,000]. Expense of
building I take upon myself.


RequiringMrCampbel's price for one year, but
for one year only, what idea could I have that
my representations should be expected to account for a
single penny of it, any more than that MrCampbels
representations should
account for the allowance made
to him? his for the price
received by him?
What if I had required the same price for
half a dozen years, or all along for the whole term?
Could I suppose that I was to fare the worse for making
the abatement so much the sooner?


MrCampbel's first price was L 38 a head:
[=L 38,000] Then more were reason, why in my instance the first price
would the subsequent one, still more is his, that without adverting to the building. After the first
year the labour too may be reckoned upon to become productive: for the first year very little or nothing . can be depended upon on the advantage of
that account score.

paragraph


Further businessIt could not surely be supposed that I meant to keep up the establishment for nothing any year: still less this first +heaviest of
all years. What less then could I be supposed to expect the whole was requiring for that



Identifier: | JB/115/120/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 115.

Date_1

1795-08-08

Marginal Summary Numbering

not numbered

Box

115

Main Headings

panopticon

Folio number

120

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

correspondence

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f1

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

letter 1077, vol. 5

ID Number

37495

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in