JB/035/074/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/035/074/001: Difference between revisions

Lea Stern (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Lea Stern (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 10: Line 10:
<p>If any more <del>more</del> further argument can be wanting <lb/><add>can be</add> in proof of the unfitness of this species of tribunal, <lb/> a more conclusive one can not be had <add>could not be wished for </add> than <lb/>what is afforded by the most professed and <unclear>liberal</unclear><lb/> argument I have been able to meet with <lb/>in favor of it.&#x2014; A new branch is proposed <lb/>to be added to the Excise System: and <del>the</del> <add>one of the two</add> great <lb/>grievances in that system being the want of a <lb/>trial by Jury, great efforts are made by an <lb/><sic>honourable</sic> gentleman, though on the ministerial <lb/>side to add in that instance an <hi rend='underline'>optional</hi><lb/> clause, giving the defendant in a prosecution <lb/>for smuggling the option of a trial in that mode.<lb/> </p>
<p>If any more <del>more</del> further argument can be wanting <lb/><add>can be</add> in proof of the unfitness of this species of tribunal, <lb/> a more conclusive one can not be had <add>could not be wished for </add> than <lb/>what is afforded by the most professed and <unclear>liberal</unclear><lb/> argument I have been able to meet with <lb/>in favor of it.&#x2014; A new branch is proposed <lb/>to be added to the Excise System: and <del>the</del> <add>one of the two</add> great <lb/>grievances in that system being the want of a <lb/>trial by Jury, great efforts are made by an <lb/><sic>honourable</sic> gentleman, though on the ministerial <lb/>side to add in that instance an <hi rend='underline'>optional</hi><lb/> clause, giving the defendant in a prosecution <lb/>for smuggling the option of a trial in that mode.<lb/> </p>


<p>Three objections are made to the summary mode <lb/>of procedure in use in cases of Excise: 1 the reward <lb/>given to the informer: 2. the insufficiency <add><unclear>abridged</unclear> shortness</add> of<lb/> the notice given <del>to</del><add>to the Defendant</add> by the summons: and the <lb/>uncertainty whether <del>it</del> <add>in each case whether</add> in any given case it has<lb/> answered its end: these three considerations <unclear>is</unclear><lb/> composed the ground and the sole ground <add><unclear>soundly</unclear></add> <gap/><lb/> for changing the trial before single <del><unclear>commonplace
<p>Three objections are made to the summary mode <lb/>of procedure in use in cases of Excise: 1 the reward <lb/>given to the informer: 2. the insufficiency <add><unclear>abridged</unclear> shortness</add> of<lb/> the notice given <del>to</del><add>to the Defendant</add> by the summons: and the <lb/>uncertainty whether <del>it</del> <add>in each case whether</add> in any given case it has<lb/> answered its end: these three considerations <unclear>is</unclear><lb/> composed the ground and the sole ground <add><unclear>doubly</unclear></add> <gap/><lb/> for changing the trial before single <del><unclear>commonplace
</unclear></del> Judges under<lb/></p>
</unclear></del> Judges under<lb/></p>
<pb/>
<pb/>

Revision as of 23:22, 19 February 2011

Click Here To Edit

This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet

1
Juries
Beaufory

If any more more further argument can be wanting
can be in proof of the unfitness of this species of tribunal,
a more conclusive one can not be had could not be wished for than
what is afforded by the most professed and liberal
argument I have been able to meet with
in favor of it.— A new branch is proposed
to be added to the Excise System: and the one of the two great
grievances in that system being the want of a
trial by Jury, great efforts are made by an
honourable gentleman, though on the ministerial
side to add in that instance an optional
clause, giving the defendant in a prosecution
for smuggling the option of a trial in that mode.

Three objections are made to the summary mode
of procedure in use in cases of Excise: 1 the reward
given to the informer: 2. the insufficiency abridged shortness of
the notice given toto the Defendant by the summons: and the
uncertainty whether it in each case whether in any given case it has
answered its end: these three considerations is
composed the ground and the sole ground doubly
for changing the trial before single commonplace Judges under


---page break---




Identifier: | JB/035/074/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 35.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

035

Main Headings

constitutional code; evidence; procedure code

Folio number

074

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d1 / d2 / d3 / d4

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::floyd & co [britannia with shield emblem]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

arthur young

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

10667

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in