★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
Auto loaded |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
' | <p> 1829 June 12 6<lb/> J.B. on Brougham's Speech</p> <p> (1) (6</p> <p> <!-- notes in another hand --> <note> 8<lb/> J.B. & HB. agreed as to<lb/> <sic>fundamentaly</sic><lb/> Differences<lb/> 1 H.B. states them in<lb/> <foreign>ubiter</foreign> J.B. at the<lb/> commence<del>d</del>ment</note></p> <p> <add> To come at <gap/> to fundamentals</add> It is no small satisfaction to me to observe that my<lb/> learned friends and I agree on fundamentals. <del>There</del> <Add> Between however</add> I regard<lb/> to these same fundamentals there is <add> <gap/></add> <del>have</del> two differences</p> <p> 1. the states then no <foreign>ubiter,</foreign> to serve a <gap/> purpose,<lb/> in so many <gap/>: neither at the beginning,<lb/> to give <add> on the analysis</add> the least to expectation; nor at the end, in the<lb/> way of inference. By no thing are pleased at the commoner</p> <p> <note> 2 HB. in so many<lb/> parenthesis JB. in the <lb/> form of distinct propositions</note></p> <p> 2. By here they are stuck in in so many parentheses <lb/> by me, they are <gap/> in the form of distinct proposition<lb/> each of them actually employed in forming the<lb/> groundwork for what <add> every thing that</add> follows </p> <p><note> 3 HB. departs from<lb/> these rules JB. never<lb/> without notice of exception</note></p> <p> 3. By him the rules of which they are <add>respectively</add> the expression<lb/> are to a wide <add> no inconsiderate</add> extent departed <add> in the field of the subject</add> from. perhaps over<lb/> the whole work the exception of the <add> <gap/></add> narrow step by which<lb/> they were suggested on which they <gap/> their book. By<lb/> me <del>the</del> no rules is in any instance departed from without<lb/> notice given of the exception, all the <gap/> of the announcement<lb/>< of the <unclear>suit</unclear></p> | ||
1829 June 12 6
J.B. on Brougham's Speech
(1) (6
8
J.B. & HB. agreed as to
fundamentaly
Differences
1 H.B. states them in
ubiter J.B. at the
commencedment
To come at to fundamentals It is no small satisfaction to me to observe that my
learned friends and I agree on fundamentals. There Between however I regard
to these same fundamentals there is have two differences
1. the states then no ubiter, to serve a purpose,
in so many : neither at the beginning,
to give on the analysis the least to expectation; nor at the end, in the
way of inference. By no thing are pleased at the commoner
2 HB. in so many
parenthesis JB. in the
form of distinct propositions
2. By here they are stuck in in so many parentheses
by me, they are in the form of distinct proposition
each of them actually employed in forming the
groundwork for what every thing that follows
3 HB. departs from
these rules JB. never
without notice of exception
3. By him the rules of which they are respectively the expression
are to a wide no inconsiderate extent departed in the field of the subject from. perhaps over
the whole work the exception of the narrow step by which
they were suggested on which they their book. By
me the no rules is in any instance departed from without
notice given of the exception, all the of the announcement
< of the suit
|
Identifier: | JB/011/012/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 11. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1829-06-12 |
8 |
||
|
011 |
law amendment |
||
|
012 |
jb on brougham's speech |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
c1 / d6 / e6 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
b&m 1829 |
||
|
arthur moore; richard doane |
|||
|
1829 |
|||
|
3709 |
|||
