★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
Auto loaded |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
''This | <p> 1829. <sic>Aug.</sic> 20.<p> <p> Reformists reviewed G.B.</p> <p><note> Brougham<lb/> 1. Imperfections<lb/> Partial Legislation acceded<lb/> to</note></p> <!-- this page is organised in three columns --> <p. 1. p.1.<lb/>"Principles and practice"<lb/> Brougham division<lb/> of the subject matter of his<lb/> speech.</p> <p> 2. p.1.<lb/> Fundamental principle<lb/> laid down at the <lb/> close of his speech —<lb/> No partial legislation.</p> <p> 3. p.1.<lb/> This the principle <lb/> laid down by J.B. in<lb/> his Codification Proposal.</p> <p> 4. p.1.<lb/> Brougham's concluding<lb/> motion accordant<lb/> with that principle.</p> <p> 5. p.2.<lb/> By Mr. Brougham in<lb/> his speech all comprehensiveness<lb/> of reform<lb/> urged partial legislation<lb/> reprobated. yet<lb/> after his speech a Commission<lb/> with limited<lb/> powers appointed<lb/> with his assent.</p> <p> 6. p.2.<lb/> This amendment of Peel's<lb/> wherby all-comprehensiveness<lb?> <sic>impossiblised</sic><lb/> adopted on a <lb/> motion from Brougham.</p> <p> 7. p.3.<lb/> This fundamental principle<lb/> in the scale of aptitude<lb/> preceded by nothing<lb/> but J.B.'s contained<lb/> in Codification<lb/> Proposal.</p> <p>8. p.3.<lb/> True that under matchless<lb/> constitution<lb/> Brougham's plan <lb/> must have become a <lb/> sole but still though<lb/> not the best it would<lb/> have been the next best.</p> <pb/> <!-- second column --> <p. 9. p.3.<lb/> By Peel's amendment<lb/> all comprehensiveness<lb/> <sic>impossiblized.</sic></p> <p> 10. p.4.<lb/> In Brougham's speech<lb/> the principle not laid<lb?> down <sic>till</sic> the end —<lb/> contravened in the <lb/> first page.</P> 11. p.4.<lb/> so inj page 2 Equity<lb/> law excluded form<lb/> the inquiry.</p> <p> 12. p.4.<lb/> Nothing can be done <lb/> to any good purpose<lb/> in Common law<lb/> without the like<lb/> operation in Equity.</p> <p> 13. p.4.<lb/> This inspeerability<lb/> well understood by<lb/> Eldon when by<lb/> Peel's mouth he forced<lb/> the separation of<lb?> Common Law & real<lb/> Property Commissions<lb/> <del><gap/></del> from Equity Commission.</p> <p> 14. p.5.<lb/> Brugham's eyes<lb/> directed by a vision<lb/> of the Rolls.</p> <p> 15. p.5.<lb/> the bait unsuccessful<lb/> if it had been<lb/> otherwise Brougham's <lb/> tongue would have<lb/> been reduced to a <lb/> state of quiescence<lb?> as to law reform.</p> | ||
1829. Aug. 20.
Reformists reviewed G.B.
Brougham
1. Imperfections
Partial Legislation acceded
to
<p. 1. p.1.
"Principles and practice"
Brougham division
of the subject matter of his
speech.
2. p.1.
Fundamental principle
laid down at the
close of his speech —
No partial legislation.
3. p.1.
This the principle
laid down by J.B. in
his Codification Proposal.
4. p.1.
Brougham's concluding
motion accordant
with that principle.
5. p.2.
By Mr. Brougham in
his speech all comprehensiveness
of reform
urged partial legislation
reprobated. yet
after his speech a Commission
with limited
powers appointed
with his assent.
6. p.2.
This amendment of Peel's
wherby all-comprehensiveness<lb?> impossiblised
adopted on a
motion from Brougham.
7. p.3.
This fundamental principle
in the scale of aptitude
preceded by nothing
but J.B.'s contained
in Codification
Proposal.
8. p.3.
True that under matchless
constitution
Brougham's plan
must have become a
sole but still though
not the best it would
have been the next best.
---page break---
<p. 9. p.3.
By Peel's amendment
all comprehensiveness
impossiblized.
10. p.4.
In Brougham's speech
the principle not laid<lb?> down till the end —
contravened in the
first page.
11. p.4.
so inj page 2 Equity
law excluded form
the inquiry.
12. p.4.
Nothing can be done
to any good purpose
in Common law
without the like
operation in Equity.
13. p.4.
This inspeerability
well understood by
Eldon when by
Peel's mouth he forced
the separation of<lb?> Common Law & real
Property Commissions
from Equity Commission.
14. p.5.
Brugham's eyes
directed by a vision
of the Rolls.
15. p.5.
the bait unsuccessful
if it had been
otherwise Brougham's
tongue would have
been reduced to a
state of quiescence<lb?> as to law reform.
|
Identifier: | JB/011/029/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 11. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1829-08-20 |
1-19 |
||
|
011 |
law amendment |
||
|
029 |
reformists reviewed |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
marginal summary sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
d4 / e1 |
||
|
george bentham |
b&m 1829 |
||
|
arthur moore; richard doane |
|||
|
1829 |
|||
|
3726 |
|||
