JB/050/145/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/050/145/001: Difference between revisions

Carno (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Lidunn (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


Pardon
<head>Pardon</head><lb/>


<p><unclear>Thus</unclear> either the circumstances specified is not in being <gap/> incapable therefore of being <gap/><lb/> the subject of a Trial, or is of too vague a nature to be collected from legal<lb/> evidence. [under <add>limitations of legal rules</add> legal limitations.]</p>  
<p><unclear>Thus</unclear> either the circumstance specified is not in being <add><gap/></add> <unclear>&amp;</unclear> incapable therefore of being <gap/><lb/> the subject of a Trial, or is of too vague a nature to be collected from legal<lb/> evidence. [under <add>limitations of legal rules</add> legal limitations.]<lb/></p>  


<p>The check therefore here <unclear>imposed</unclear> is the only check <unclear>competent</unclear> to the subject, the<lb/> same as that upon Juries the sense of shame - to which may be added, impeachment<lb/>
<p>The check therefore here <unclear>imposed</unclear> is the only check <unclear>competent</unclear> to the subject, the<lb/> same as that upon Juries the sense of shame - to which may be added, impeachment<lb/>
of the Person applying for the Pardon in any flagrant case <del>which</del> <add>as it ca</add><lb/> of <unclear>the</unclear> suggestion containing a very <unclear>obvious</unclear> falsehood -<lb/></p>
of the Person applying for the Pardon in any flagrant case <del>which</del> <add>as it ca</add><lb/> of <unclear>the</unclear> suggestion containing a very <unclear>obvious</unclear> falsehood -<lb/></p>


<p>In the instance of particular <gap/> [to be specified by the law] for which, (should<lb/>
<p>In the instance of particular crimes [to be specified by the law] for which, (should<lb/>
there be any such), it may be thought advisable to retain punishments in <unclear>hor</unclear><lb/> as it is called, without design of universal execution - as <del>in</del> under the Laws<lb/> against Papists these specifications may be dispensed with</p>
there be any such), it may be thought advisable to retain punishments <hi rend='underline'>in <unclear>hor</unclear></hi><lb/> as it is called, without design of universal execution - as <del>in</del> <add>under</add> the Laws<lb/> against Papists, these specifications may be dispensed with.<lb/></p>


<note><gap/>? should he name of the person applying for the <gap/> be specified in the <gap/> would or would not this be laying too great a restriction on Pardons if a man venture <add>was forced to</add> himself to procure one
<note><gap/>? should he name of the person applying for the <gap/> be specified in the <gap/> would or would not this be laying too great a restriction on Pardons if a man venture <add>was forced to</add> himself to procure one
<gap/> too whether any <unclear>distinction</unclear> this law between <gap/></note><pb/>
<gap/> too whether any <unclear>distinction</unclear> this law between crimes</note><pb/>





Revision as of 12:46, 6 March 2011

Click Here To Edit

Pardon

Thus either the circumstance specified is not in being & incapable therefore of being
the subject of a Trial, or is of too vague a nature to be collected from legal
evidence. [under limitations of legal rules legal limitations.]

The check therefore here imposed is the only check competent to the subject, the
same as that upon Juries the sense of shame - to which may be added, impeachment
of the Person applying for the Pardon in any flagrant case which as it ca
of the suggestion containing a very obvious falsehood -

In the instance of particular crimes [to be specified by the law] for which, (should
there be any such), it may be thought advisable to retain punishments in hor
as it is called, without design of universal execution - as in under the Laws
against Papists, these specifications may be dispensed with.

? should he name of the person applying for the be specified in the would or would not this be laying too great a restriction on Pardons if a man venture was forced to himself to procure one too whether any distinction this law between crimes
---page break---





Identifier: | JB/050/145/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 50.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

050

Main Headings

procedure code

Folio number

145

Info in main headings field

pardon

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[gr with crown motif] [britannia with shield motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

16136

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in