★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
Auto loaded |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<p> 1829 June 18 <note> <!-- in pencil --> 1<hi rend="superscript">o</hi></note></p> <head> review of Bullen & Brougham</head> <p><note><!-- in pencil --> Beginning?<lb/> <!-- overwrites words in pencil --> II Sano-reformists<lb/> <del>3<lb/> 2. <gap/> Reformists</del></note></p> <p> <!-- numbers in pencil --> 2 (2)<lb/> <add> hold them <gap/> that be <gap/> <gap/><lb/> be unlimited profit — or a <gap/><lb/> <unclear>from plan to</unclear></add> </p> <p> So much for the thorough and sincere reformists, now for <add>as to</add> the <gap/>reformists.<lb/> Among <add>For existing</add> lawyers <gap/> though and <gap/> refunds may be<lb/> content perhaps any the <gap/> of in hand, <add> any employment be given to </add> <gap/> <del><gap/></del> <add> to</add> those of both <gap/><lb/> assuredly one by those of hand and foot. For <gap/> those whom fate is <lb/> <gap/> <gap/> class employment may <add> might</add> <gap/> to <gap/> into the law <!-- continues in margin -->of the land, for <gap/><lb/> supposing this for higher <lb/> class of <gap/>, a <lb/> certain degree of boldness<lb/> be supposed.</p> <p> <gap/> in the <gap/> <add>blindness</add> establishment and regulated by<lb/> the fee-gathering system can his are his breach of feebroker — the affront <gap/><lb/> the professional lawyer</p> <p> For the extinction <add> abolition</add> of the fee gathering system to the <sic>compleat</sic><lb/> substitution of payment by salary to payment by fee no objection would<lb/> <del> by many of the <gap/></del> <add> be raised</add> — may <gap/> one of the most enlightened<lb/> men by whom no objection would be made. On the contrary in<lb/> the <gap/> and so for they not <gap/> would with gladness behold<lb/> the establishment of reform <gap/> <gap/> in <gap/> in the demands they<lb/> make for it. Why? upon what principle? Upon the <foreign> <hi rend="underline">Quo <gap/></hi> </foreign><lb/> up to <gap/> judicature principle. Under the existing system, as<lb/> <gap/> shows at present, those parts of the substance of <gap/><lb/> which continually <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <add> <gap/> <gap/> of their existence</add> is capable of being employed<lb/> in <gap/> is divided in proportion <del>not</del> perhaps not<lb/> widely different <hi rend="superscript">+</hi> between <gap/> the <del>form</del> official and the professional hand,<lb/> Say for arguments sake <add> <gap/> of argument</add> in equal portions. Will these <del>the greater the</del><lb/> <del><gap/></del> extinguish to <gap/> <add> <gap/> <add> mass</add> at present employed in gorging the<lb/> <del>professional</del> <add> official</add> stomach, the whole of the <gap/> "<hi rend="underline">Business mass</hi>, and<lb/> find or may find its way not within the professional ones. <del><gap/></del> In<lb/> making exact and minute calculation time and labour could be economically<lb/> employed: but upon a <del>right</del> rigid <gap/> and result<lb/> <gap/> can all seeds of the <gap/> <gap/> <sic>expence</sic> <add> it being the <gap/></add> which give <gap/><lb/> offered pocket, the <gap/> of <gap/> capable of <gap/> <gap/><lb/> and as a <gap/> <gap/> total number of <gap/> would <add> will</add> be doubled — <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> kept defendants.</p> <!-- line drawn across the page --> <p> + See Closing <gap/> report analysis of the <sic>expence</sic> of <gap/> rends</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | ||
1829 June 18 1o
review of Bullen & Brougham
Beginning?
II Sano-reformists
3
2. Reformists
2 (2)
hold them that be
be unlimited profit — or a
from plan to
So much for the thorough and sincere reformists, now for as to the reformists.
Among For existing lawyers though and refunds may be
content perhaps any the of in hand, any employment be given to to those of both
assuredly one by those of hand and foot. For those whom fate is
class employment may might to into the law of the land, for
supposing this for higher
class of , a
certain degree of boldness
be supposed.
in the blindness establishment and regulated by
the fee-gathering system can his are his breach of feebroker — the affront
the professional lawyer
For the extinction abolition of the fee gathering system to the compleat
substitution of payment by salary to payment by fee no objection would
by many of the be raised — may one of the most enlightened
men by whom no objection would be made. On the contrary in
the and so for they not would with gladness behold
the establishment of reform in in the demands they
make for it. Why? upon what principle? Upon the Quo
up to judicature principle. Under the existing system, as
shows at present, those parts of the substance of
which continually of their existence is capable of being employed
in is divided in proportion not perhaps not
widely different + between the form official and the professional hand,
Say for arguments sake of argument in equal portions. Will these the greater the
extinguish to <add> mass at present employed in gorging the
professional official stomach, the whole of the "Business mass, and
find or may find its way not within the professional ones. In
making exact and minute calculation time and labour could be economically
employed: but upon a right rigid and result
can all seeds of the expence it being the which give
offered pocket, the of capable of
and as a total number of would will be doubled — kept defendants.
+ See Closing report analysis of the expence of rends
|
Identifier: | JB/011/070/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 11. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1829-06-18 |
|||
|
011 |
law amendment |
||
|
070 |
review of bentham & brougham |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
c2 / e2 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
b&m 1829 |
||
|
arthur moore; richard doane |
|||
|
1829 |
|||
|
3767 |
|||
