★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
Auto loaded |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>1829 March 19 <!-- number in pencil --> 2<lb/> Petition</head> <p><note>Supplement</note></p> <p><note> J.B. & Brougham</note></p> <p><note> J B. & Brougham reasons<lb/>of <del>the</del> difference between<lb/> them</note></p> <p>2</p> <p> when then — a defence so great <add>wide</add> as has been<lb/> alluded to — can it have proceeded? Answer from two<lb/> sources, law and practice <Add>situation</add>. To go into any detail<lb/> approaching to Client to which the matter of this Petition,<lb/> been excluded itself would <del>have been altogether</del> <gap/><lb/> to a <gap/> or herculean as that in question<lb/> been altogether incompatible with continuance in the possessors<lb/> — if what be as so bright an ornament: <del>in</del><lb/> and <add>scarcely</add> less so would have been the speaking of that other<lb/> profession with a freedom approaching to that with which<lb/> it has been spoken of in <del>the above</del> these same Petitions.<lb/> a <gap/> <del>which</del> without which <del>it would have been</del><lb/> the task could not with any reasonable <add><gap/> encouraging</add> hope of success<lb/> have been undertaken: because so long as the issue of Judge<lb/> and profession of Advocate or <del><gap/></del> needs any <gap/><lb/> <gap/> Agent of the party were <add>are</add> in the same hands</p> <p>This consideration, it appeared to me that to <ad> my</add><lb/> <add><gap/></add> have attempted to convey to him any conception of the <gap/><lb/> work could have had no better effect than that of producing<lb/> useless annoyance: accordingly <del>it will not <gap/></del> <add> to his eyes and those of the public</add> an end<lb/> the <gap/> <gap/> will <del><gap/> it</del> have conveyed it</p> <p>By this declaration my learned friend is ceased of all<lb/> respectability and stands acquitted <add> in the eyes of his learned brethren</add> from all <gap/><lb/> of <gap/>, with the <gap/> <add> so <gap/></add> made upon them by the <gap/> <add> <del><gap/> <gap/> upon the learned <gap/></add><lb/> and <sic>renegarding</sic> hand.</p> | |||
1829 March 19 2
Petition
Supplement
J.B. & Brougham
J B. & Brougham reasons
of the difference between
them
2
when then — a defence so great wide as has been
alluded to — can it have proceeded? Answer from two
sources, law and practice situation. To go into any detail
approaching to Client to which the matter of this Petition,
been excluded itself would have been altogether
to a or herculean as that in question
been altogether incompatible with continuance in the possessors
— if what be as so bright an ornament: in
and scarcely less so would have been the speaking of that other
profession with a freedom approaching to that with which
it has been spoken of in the above these same Petitions.
a which without which it would have been
the task could not with any reasonable encouraging hope of success
have been undertaken: because so long as the issue of Judge
and profession of Advocate or needs any
Agent of the party were are in the same hands
This consideration, it appeared to me that to <ad> my</add>
have attempted to convey to him any conception of the
work could have had no better effect than that of producing
useless annoyance: accordingly it will not to his eyes and those of the public an end
the will it have conveyed it
By this declaration my learned friend is ceased of all
respectability and stands acquitted in the eyes of his learned brethren from all
of , with the so made upon them by the upon the learned
and renegarding hand.
|
Identifier: | JB/011/154/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 11. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1829-03-19 |
not numbered |
||
|
011 |
law amendment |
||
|
154 |
petition |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
c2 / d2 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
1828 |
||
|
1828 |
|||
|
3851 |
|||
