JB/035/050/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/035/050/002: Difference between revisions

Lea Stern (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Lea Stern (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
<p>class out of which it will be thought proper to take<lb/> Jurymen will always see <add>a part</add> of the people <del>under</del> <add>beneath</add><lb/> their feet: and that part will be a vast majority.<lb/>  The <del><unclear>opening</unclear></del> <add><del>weight</del>  
<p>class out of which it will be thought proper to take<lb/> Jurymen will always see <add>a part</add> of the people <del>under</del> <add>beneath</add><lb/> their feet: and that part will be a vast majority.<lb/>  The <del><unclear>opening</unclear></del> <add><del>weight</del>  
</add>  <add>Take mankind through, the weight</add> of superior station is observed to bear <lb/> <del><unclear>deadest</unclear></del><add>added text</add> heaviest upon the class immediately below: tyranny, <lb/><del>being naturally</del> when it is not <del>contained</del> <add>checked,</add> being<lb/> irritated, by the apprehension of resistance. <note>the nearer the classes, <del><gap/></del> <add>the</add> more <unclear>in his</unclear> communication; and the more clashing of <unclear>autocrats</unclear>. <del>Law</del>  </note> Divide<lb/> the <del>whole body of the nation for this purpose</del> <add>people</add> into<lb/> three classes: <del>the first bear hard upon the second:</del> <lb/><add><del>being</del></add> <del>the second upon the third.</del> <del>This</del> <add>
</add>  <add>Take mankind through, the weight</add> of superior station is observed to bear <lb/> <del><unclear>deadest</unclear></del><add>added text</add> heaviest upon the class immediately below: tyranny, <lb/><del>being naturally</del> when it is not <del>contained</del> <add>checked,</add> being<lb/> irritated, by the apprehension of resistance. <note>the nearer the classes, <del><gap/></del> <add>the</add> more <unclear>in his</unclear> communication; and the more clashing of <unclear>autocrats</unclear>. <del>Law</del>  </note> Divide<lb/> the <del>whole body of the nation for this purpose</del> <add>people</add> into<lb/> three classes: <del>the first bear hard upon the second:</del> <lb/><add><del>being</del></add> <del>the second upon the third.</del> <del>This</del> <add>
The</add> great jealousy is<lb/> between the highest and the middle one, and between <lb/>the middle one and the lowest. Between the highest<lb/> and the lowest there is rather a natural alliance <lb/>than a natural hostility: they are the enemies of<lb/> each others enemies. <add>Apply this to particulars</add><!-- Alfred Doolittle! --> It is from the class of farmers<lb/> that you will take Jurymen not from the class of<lb/> <sic>labourers</sic> in husbandry: but if the <sic>labourer</sic> has any <lb/>thing of opposition or partiality to <unclear>apprehend</unclear>, it is much<lb/>more from the farmer than from the farmer's landlord.<lb/> It is from the class of master-manufacturers<lb/> that you will take <del>jurors</del> Jurymen; not<lb/> from that of journey-men in the same branch. <lb/>
The</add> great jealousy is<lb/> between the highest and the middle one, and between <lb/>the middle one and the lowest. Between the highest<lb/> and the lowest there is rather a natural alliance <lb/>than a natural hostility: they are the enemies of<lb/> each others enemies. <add>Apply this to particulars</add><!-- Alfred Doolittle/Professor Higgins! --> It is from the class of farmers<lb/> that you will take Jurymen not from the class of<lb/> <sic>labourers</sic> in husbandry: but if the <sic>labourer</sic> has any <lb/>thing of opposition or partiality to <unclear>apprehend</unclear>, it is much<lb/>more from the farmer than from the farmer's landlord.<lb/> It is from the class of master-manufacturers<lb/> that you will take <del>jurors</del> Jurymen; not<lb/> from that of journey-men in the same branch. <lb/>
 
but if the journey man has any thing of <del>to</del> oppression or partiality to apprehend, it is much more from<lb/> the master manufacturer than from the rich customer.<lb/>
 


<note><head>Note</head> It is by <sic>aristocratical</sic> blindness and <sic>aristocratical</sic> prejudice <del>led</del> <add><unclear>first</unclear> we are led</add> to regard this institution as an antidote against <sic>aristocratical</sic>injustice. Where is the political speculator, unless it be Rousseau, <del>in whose</del> to whom the interests of the real majority of the people have been really first in view?  </note>
This <del>supposed</del> <add>nominal</add> <gap/> of condition, even it a principle<lb/> that could be depended upon, would therefore be <add><del><unclear>somehow</unclear></del></add> adverse<lb/> to impartiality, rather than <sic>favourable</sic>. But it is not to be depended.<lb/><p><pb/>
   
   



Revision as of 02:52, 26 February 2011

Click Here To Edit


class out of which it will be thought proper to take
Jurymen will always see a part of the people under beneath
their feet: and that part will be a vast majority.
The opening weight Take mankind through, the weight of superior station is observed to bear
deadestadded text heaviest upon the class immediately below: tyranny,
being naturally when it is not contained checked, being
irritated, by the apprehension of resistance. the nearer the classes, the more in his communication; and the more clashing of autocrats. Law Divide
the whole body of the nation for this purpose people into
three classes: the first bear hard upon the second:
being the second upon the third. This The great jealousy is
between the highest and the middle one, and between
the middle one and the lowest. Between the highest
and the lowest there is rather a natural alliance
than a natural hostility: they are the enemies of
each others enemies. Apply this to particulars It is from the class of farmers
that you will take Jurymen not from the class of
labourers in husbandry: but if the labourer has any
thing of opposition or partiality to apprehend, it is much
more from the farmer than from the farmer's landlord.
It is from the class of master-manufacturers
that you will take jurors Jurymen; not
from that of journey-men in the same branch.
but if the journey man has any thing of to oppression or partiality to apprehend, it is much more from
the master manufacturer than from the rich customer.
Note It is by aristocratical blindness and aristocratical prejudice led first we are led to regard this institution as an antidote against aristocraticalinjustice. Where is the political speculator, unless it be Rousseau, in whose to whom the interests of the real majority of the people have been really first in view? This supposed nominal of condition, even it a principle
that could be depended upon, would therefore be somehow adverse
to impartiality, rather than favourable. But it is not to be depended.


---page break---
This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet

Identifier: | JB/035/050/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 35.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

26, 26*

Box

035

Main Headings

constitutional code; evidence; procedure code

Folio number

050

Info in main headings field

Image

002

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f3 / f4 / f5 / f6

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::l munn [britannia with shield emblem]]]

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

benjamin constant

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

10643

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in