JB/035/008/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/035/008/001: Difference between revisions

Lidunn (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Diane Folan (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/035/008/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/035/008/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<p>
 
It is given by the <del><gap/></del> newspaper-reports as <lb/>
 
 
<head>Note</head><!-- written in pencil -->
<head>Juries</head><!-- written in pencil -->
<head><!-- symbol -->1</head><!-- written in pencil -->
<p><!-- indent first word -->It is given by the <del><unclear>re</unclear></del> newspaper-reports as <lb/>
<del>an instance</del> <add>"a proof</add> of the ignorance of a Country <lb/>
<del>an instance</del> <add>"a proof</add> of the ignorance of a Country <lb/>
Jury" and as having "much excited the visibility <lb/>
Jury" and as having "much excited the visibility <lb/>
of the Court."</p>
of the Court."</p>
 
<p><!-- indent first word -->Unsophisticated common sense passes naturally <lb/>
<p>Unsophisticated common sense passes naturally <lb/>
for ignorance in the eyes of <add>with <del>an</del> English lawyers,</add> and with <lb/>
for ignorance in the eyes of <add>with <del>an</del> English lawyers,</add> and with <lb/>
<del>those</del> whoever has been in the habit of viewing <lb/>
<del>those</del> whoever has been in the habit of viewing <lb/>
objects with their eyes. The proper object of <lb/>
objects with their eyes. The proper object of <lb/>
visibility would here have been not the mistake <lb/>
visibility would here have been not the mistake <lb/>
of man who for want of having been taught <add><unclear>shown</unclear></add> <lb/>
of men who for want of having been taught <add>shown</add> <lb/>
were unable to divine the depths of absurdity <lb/>
were unable to divine the depths of absurdity <lb/>
and <unclear>impiety</unclear>, but the rulers who beheld such <lb/>
and impiety, but the rulers who behold such <lb/>
abominations <del>and</del> without a thought about <lb/>the cure.<lb/></p><pb/>
abominations <del>and</del> withsuch<!-- I think there is one letter too many for it to be 'without' (previously written).  I think it says withsuch' --> a thought about <lb/>the cure.</p>





Revision as of 23:38, 17 March 2011

Click Here To Edit


Note Juries 1

It is given by the re newspaper-reports as
an instance "a proof of the ignorance of a Country
Jury" and as having "much excited the visibility
of the Court."

Unsophisticated common sense passes naturally
for ignorance in the eyes of with an English lawyers, and with
those whoever has been in the habit of viewing
objects with their eyes. The proper object of
visibility would here have been not the mistake
of men who for want of having been taught shown
were unable to divine the depths of absurdity
and impiety, but the rulers who behold such
abominations and withsuch a thought about
the cure.




Identifier: | JB/035/008/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 35.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

035

Main Headings

constitutional code; evidence; procedure code

Folio number

008

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

floyd & co

Marginals

Paper Producer

arthur young

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

10601

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in