★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
<note><del>in not taking any measures to prevent to riot, though he knew of <sic>it's</sic> being intended.</del></note> charged with: but besides this, a fine is laid on<lb/> | <note><del>in not taking any measures to prevent to riot, though he knew of <sic>it's</sic> being intended.</del></note> charged with: but besides this, a fine is laid on<lb/> | ||
the Corporation.</p> | the Corporation.</p> | ||
<p>Of these punishments that on the<add><del>The <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> of</del><add><del><gap/> the <gap/> for supplying</del></add></add> Provost, we may<lb/> | |||
observe was <del>punishment</del> <hi rend="underline">in propridam personam</hi> | |||
The fine on the corporation was acollective punishment<lb/> | |||
falling on as many persons <del>also</del><add>as</add> might<lb/> | |||
find themselves in any shape prejudiced by such<lb/> | |||
fine. How the ground<add><del><del>reason</del></del><add><del>matter</del></add></add> of applying this latter punishment<lb/> | |||
was not the inab<gap/> absolute<add><del><gap/></del></add> impracticability<lb/> | |||
of applying any <del>proper</del> punishment of<lb/> | |||
the proper kind at all. The Provost <del>as</del> we see<lb/> | |||
was punished for the negative offence of <del><gap/></del><add>his</add> neglect. | |||
And it appears <add><del>is <gap/> in</del></add> from another Act which<lb/> | |||
immediately follows that in question that a number<lb/> | |||
of persons actually <del>fugittives | |||
</del><add>fugitives</add> for the <add>prinipal</add></p><pb/> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | ||
Click Here To Edit Punishment in alenam perfornam
Inf:n Collective Punishts men for the misbehaviour of a part of it. I will
mention take notice them in their order.
The first I shall mention is the case of the city
+ 7th Sept.r of Edingburgh which happen'd in 1736.+. A
very numerous mob rose up in arms seized the
City Guard, possessed themselves of the City Gates,
and in defiance of the<add>committed an inorder</add> Incenspublic<add>(Regents)</add> authorities, put to
death a Captain Porteous who had been lay under
sentence of death but had been reprieved. This outrage
occasioned an Act of Parliament to be
*10 G.2.c.34 made* by which the G.2. By this Act a particular
punishment is inflicted upon the Lord Provost
of the Town for the particular neglect that is therehe is there
in not taking any measures to prevent to riot, though he knew of it's being intended. charged with: but besides this, a fine is laid on
the Corporation.
Of these punishments that on theThe of<add> the for supplying</add> Provost, we may
observe was punishment in propridam personam
The fine on the corporation was acollective punishment
falling on as many persons alsoas might
find themselves in any shape prejudiced by such
fine. How the groundreason<add>matter</add> of applying this latter punishment
was not the inab absolute impracticability
of applying any proper punishment of
the proper kind at all. The Provost as we see
was punished for the negative offence of his neglect.
And it appears is in from another Act which
immediately follows that in question that a number
of persons actually fugittives
fugitives for the prinipal
---page break---
|
Identifier: | JB/141/137/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 141. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
not numbered |
|||
|
141 |
rationale of punishment |
||
|
137 |
punishment in alienam personam |
||
|
002 |
|||
|
text sheet |
2 |
||
|
recto |
f34 / f35 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::propatria [britannia motif]]] |
||
|
48354 |
|||
