JB/050/002/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/050/002/002: Difference between revisions

Emily.K (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Emily.K (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 20: Line 20:
that for that <gap/><lb/>
that for that <gap/><lb/>
of delinquency no <lb/>
of delinquency no <lb/>
Inductment was to <lb/>
<sic>Inductment</sic> was to <lb/>
be<hi rend="superscript"><gap/>superscript text</hi> maintained.<lb/></note>
be<hi rend="superscript"><gap/>superscript text</hi> maintained.<lb/></note>




<p>In the case entitled the King against <gap/><lb/>
<p>In the case entitled the King against <gap/><lb/>
  <unclear><del>1. <unclear>G.3<hi rend="superscript">1760</hi></unclear></del></unclear> the Def:<hi rend="superscript">being in procure</hi> <del>had</del> Inducted for selling<hi rend="superscript">a <gap/> in</hi><lb/>
  <unclear><del>1. <unclear>G.3<hi rend="superscript">1760</hi></unclear></del></unclear> the Def:<hi rend="superscript">being in procure</hi> <del>had</del> <sic>Inducted</sic> for selling<hi rend="superscript">a <gap/> in</hi><lb/>
a lesser quantity of the commodity  
a lesser quantity of the commodity<lb/>
<del>16 Galleons of Beer for 18</del>. and which he
<del>16 Galleons of Beer for 1 d.</del>. and which he<lb/>
dealt as if for a greater:After the man
dealt as if for a greater:After the man<lb/>
had been convicted of the prosecution <unclear>this</unclear> man
had been convicted of the prosecution <unclear>this</unclear> man<lb/>
had been convicted &amp; the prosecution <gap/><gap/>
had been convicted if the prosecution <gap/><gap/><lb/>
an to the last stage, it comes not on <del><gap/></del><hi rend="superscript"><gap/>superscript text</hi>
an to the last stage, it comes not on <del><gap/></del><hi rend="superscript"><gap/></hi><lb/>
in treat of Judgement, that there could be no
in treat of Judgement, that there could be no<lb/>
preference for supporting an <unclear>Indictment</unclear> for
preference for supporting an <sic>Inductment</sic> for<lb/>
such an offence, for that the offence<hi rend="superscript">it had been</hi> <gap/> judged not
such an offence, for that the offence<hi rend="superscript">it had been</hi> <gap/> judged not<lb/>
inductable by 3 cases precisely and present
<sic>inductable</sic> by 3 cases precisely and present an <lb/>
6 years before, another 9, &amp;the 3 at a  
6 years before, another 9, &amp;the 3rd at a <lb/>
  <gap/><gap/> the prosecution has not mentioned
  time <gap/> the <gap/> has not mentioned <lb/>
<hi rend="superscript">the 2</hi>
<hi rend="superscript">the 2nd</hi>
One of them was so exactly<hi rend="superscript">laterally <gap/></hi> in print that the
One of them was so exactly<hi rend="superscript">laterally <gap/></hi> in print that the<lb/>
Commodity, &amp; if I understand the Report aright,
Commodity, &amp; if I understand the Report aright,<lb/>
even the very quantities <gap/> of defendant were
even the very quantities due of defendant were
the same.<lb/></p>
the same.<lb/></p>


<p>Nothing can be more certain, that that if <del>ano</del><hi rend="superscript">all</hi> <lb/>
<p>Nothing can be more certain, than that if <del>any</del><hi rend="superscript">all</hi> <lb/>
<hi rend="superscript">or one may mention to say, many </hi>of these cases had been <gap/> in a publication</p><p>paragraph</p>
<hi rend="superscript">or one may mention to say, any </hi>of these cases had been <unclear>reported</unclear> in a publication</p><p>paragraph</p>
<pb>
<pb>



Revision as of 15:48, 10 May 2016

Click Here To Edit

NOTORIETY Barron 1125
The man being convicted & the prosecution leaving man
to the last stay as
no power to cases
it not on

mention of
Judgement that
there had been
previously inparcial
come out and motion
in Arrest of Judgement
Wherein it
had been decided
that for that
of delinquency no
Inductment was to
besuperscript text maintained.


In the case entitled the King against
1. <unclear>G.31760</unclear> the Def:being in procure had Inducted for sellinga in
a lesser quantity of the commodity
16 Galleons of Beer for 1 d.. and which he
dealt as if for a greater:After the man
had been convicted of the prosecution this man
had been convicted if the prosecution
an to the last stage, it comes not on
in treat of Judgement, that there could be no
preference for supporting an Inductment for
such an offence, for that the offenceit had been judged not
inductable by 3 cases precisely and present an
6 years before, another 9, &the 3rd at a
time the has not mentioned
the 2nd One of them was so exactlylaterally in print that the
Commodity, & if I understand the Report aright,
even the very quantities due of defendant were the same.

Nothing can be more certain, than that if anyall
or one may mention to say, any of these cases had been reported in a publication

paragraph

<pb>








Identifier: | JB/050/002/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 50.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

050

Main Headings

procedure code

Folio number

002

Info in main headings field

introduction. crimes. offences sins &c

Image

002

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[lion with vryheyt motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

15993

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in