★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
<note>33 Cause &c</note><lb/> | <note>33 Cause &c</note><lb/> | ||
The 4<hi rend="superscript">th</hi> and last of the causes that have been mentioned <note>16 continued</note><lb/> | <p>The 4<hi rend="superscript">th</hi> and last of the causes that have been mentioned <note>16 continued</note><lb/> | ||
as appearing to concurr in the production of<lb/> | as appearing to concurr in the production of<lb/> | ||
the <sic>depretiation</sic> in question are is the <del><gap/> note</del> quality<lb/> | the <sic>depretiation</sic> in question are is the <del><gap/> note</del> quality<lb/> | ||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
object) it is the <del>more capable</del> better adapted to bear<lb/> | object) it is the <del>more capable</del> better adapted to bear<lb/> | ||
folding <add>to reduce it to</add>into a compass fit for the pocket and pocket<lb/> | folding <add>to reduce it to</add>into a compass fit for the pocket and pocket<lb/> | ||
-book without cracking <del><gap/></del> the edges and coming to<lb/> | |||
pieces.</p> | |||
<p>In these particulars the difference between the<lb/> | |||
Bank note and the Exchequer Bill is not great: though<lb/> | |||
as far as it goes rather to the disadvantage of the Exchequer<lb/> | |||
Bill. <add>In point of size</add> The Exchequer Bill is much upon par<lb/> | |||
with the Bank note: not quite so long: a little broader<lb/> | |||
these differences at all material: but the paper is<lb/> | |||
a great deal thicker: rather of a thick <add>and brittle</add> sort than<lb/> | |||
otherwise: so much so as to be to appearance more<lb/> | |||
exposed to crack than any of the papers commonly<lb/> | |||
used as writing papers.</p><pb/> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | ||
33 Cause &c
The 4th and last of the causes that have been mentioned 16 continued
as appearing to concurr in the production of
the depretiation in question are is the note quality
of the instrument in respect of its sensible proerties:
- the bulk and thickness of the paper. In A Bank
note is perhaps in respect of both these properties is
for circulation as can be imagined. In point of
size and thickness neither so large as to take up an inconvenient
quantity of room in the pocket or pocket-bok, not even
when a considerable number are taken together are nor yeton the other hand so
small as to be liable to escape notice and be lost: in
pointrespect of thickness while by reason of itsthe extraordinary
thickness of the papers (besides which the principal objectbe being so much better
guarded against fraudulent alteration which is the principal
object) it is the more capable better adapted to bear
folding to reduce it tointo a compass fit for the pocket and pocket
-book without cracking the edges and coming to
pieces.
In these particulars the difference between the
Bank note and the Exchequer Bill is not great: though
as far as it goes rather to the disadvantage of the Exchequer
Bill. In point of size The Exchequer Bill is much upon par
with the Bank note: not quite so long: a little broader
these differences at all material: but the paper is
a great deal thicker: rather of a thick and brittle sort than
otherwise: so much so as to be to appearance more
exposed to crack than any of the papers commonly
used as writing papers.
---page break---
