★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
Auto loaded |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
10<lb/>C 1<p><note>17<lb/>Names by which the<lb/>principle has been<lb/>designated, in many<lb/>points inappropriate.</note><lb/>To the diffusion of the system on the reception & adopt<hi rend="superscript">n.</hi> of wh<hi rend="superscript">h.</hi><lb/>the maximum of happiness in the whole human species not to mention<lb/>others <add>is</add> so inseparably and incontroverti<add>a</add>bly dependent, it happens, <add>rather</add><lb/>unfortunately, that the <del>several</del> denomination, by which, at different<lb/>times, it came to be designated <del>were</del> was in many points so<lb/>far from being an apt one.</p><p><note>18.<lb/>Prin. of ut<hi rend="superscript">y.</hi> <gap/><lb/>expressiveness of the<lb/>term</note><lb/>At first, the name was the <hi rend="underline">principle of utility</hi>. here the fault<lb/>was that, by the expression thus employed, not the idea meant<lb/>to be conveyed but one widely different from it was in fact<lb/>at all times <hi rend="underline">liable</hi> to be conveyed, and to an inconsiderable<lb/>extent actually conveyed: and of this mistake<del>n</del> <del>a</del> <add>in discourse one</add> bad a practice<lb/>was the <del>causing that</del> drawing down to a correspondent extent<lb/>the sentiment of disapprobation upon the opinion in the reception<lb/>of wh<hi rend="superscript">h.</hi> all the good that c<hi rend="superscript">d.</hi> be produced by the disseminat<hi rend="superscript">n.</hi> of the<lb/>principle depended.</p><p><note>19.<lb/>The word regarded as<lb/>calling for approbat<hi rend="superscript">n.</hi><lb/>of every measure<lb/>contributing to an<lb/>end whatever that<lb/>end be.</note><lb/>To the extent in question, the principle of utility, was, in a word<lb/>regarded, as above, (look at the anterior passage referred to) by<lb/>wh<hi rend="superscript">h.</hi> approbation was called for by every opinion or operation by wh<hi rend="superscript">h.</hi><lb/>a contribution was made to this or that end, whatsoever might<lb/>be the nature of that end: the _____ of it, being regarded as<lb/>the principe by wh<hi rend="superscript">h.</hi> approbation is called for, for such measures<lb/><del>also</del> <add>alone</add> as are contributory to human happiness taken in the aggregate,<lb/>fixed the maximum of the happiness enjoyed by the<lb/>aggregate composed of the several members of wh<hi rend="superscript">h.</hi> the in<lb/>question is composed.</p><p><note>20.<lb/></note></p> | |||
10
C 1
17
Names by which the
principle has been
designated, in many
points inappropriate.
To the diffusion of the system on the reception & adoptn. of whh.
the maximum of happiness in the whole human species not to mention
others is so inseparably and incontrovertiably dependent, it happens, rather
unfortunately, that the several denomination, by which, at different
times, it came to be designated were was in many points so
far from being an apt one.
18.
Prin. of uty.
expressiveness of the
term
At first, the name was the principle of utility. here the fault
was that, by the expression thus employed, not the idea meant
to be conveyed but one widely different from it was in fact
at all times liable to be conveyed, and to an inconsiderable
extent actually conveyed: and of this mistaken a in discourse one bad a practice
was the causing that drawing down to a correspondent extent
the sentiment of disapprobation upon the opinion in the reception
of whh. all the good that cd. be produced by the disseminatn. of the
principle depended.
19.
The word regarded as
calling for approbatn.
of every measure
contributing to an
end whatever that
end be.
To the extent in question, the principle of utility, was, in a word
regarded, as above, (look at the anterior passage referred to) by
whh. approbation was called for by every opinion or operation by whh.
a contribution was made to this or that end, whatsoever might
be the nature of that end: the _____ of it, being regarded as
the principe by whh. approbation is called for, for such measures
also alone as are contributory to human happiness taken in the aggregate,
fixed the maximum of the happiness enjoyed by the
aggregate composed of the several members of whh. the in
question is composed.
20.
|
Identifier: | JB/014/367/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 14. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
17-21 |
|||
|
014 |
deontology |
||
|
367 |
|||
|
001 |
|||
|
copy/fair copy sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
f10 |
||
|
john flowerdew colls |
b&m 1829 |
||
|
arthur moore; richard doane |
|||
|
1829 |
|||
|
5130 |
|||
