JB/032/003/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/032/003/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<del>In the</del> Under the British government the same<lb/>
 
error oversight false <unclear>humaneity</unclear> has given birth to<lb/>
<add>acts of generosity <add>donations <add>restitutions</add> indulgences which through less <unclear>copensive</unclear> in the<lb/>
first instance may in their <unclear>reach</unclear> consequences<lb/>
be much more detrimental to the state. <unclear>Estates</unclear><lb/>
of Rebels have been given back by government<lb/>
some after a possession of ??? other, after a possession<lb/>
?? 75 years. The loss to the state is<lb/>
trifling but the principle is big with danger. The<lb/>
same law which ensures to any individual his<lb/>
particular possessions ensured these possessions to the state.<lb/>
Why give any thing to the descendents of state-delinquents<lb/>
so long ago descend? &#x2014; Why? &#x2014; unless<lb/>
under the <unclear>action</unclear> of natural and <unclear>indefeasible</unclear> <add>hereditary</add> rights<lb/>
rights of a <add>complexion</add> more sacred complexion than that<lb/>
of any which human laws can create. Apply <add>Turn now</add><lb/>
these <unclear>pretended</unclear> natural rights, will 20 years more<lb/>
will




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 10:46, 5 July 2017

Click Here To Edit

In the Under the British government the same
error oversight false humaneity has given birth to
acts of generosity <add>donations <add>restitutions indulgences which through less copensive in the
first instance may in their reach consequences
be much more detrimental to the state. Estates
of Rebels have been given back by government
some after a possession of ??? other, after a possession
?? 75 years. The loss to the state is
trifling but the principle is big with danger. The
same law which ensures to any individual his
particular possessions ensured these possessions to the state.
Why give any thing to the descendents of state-delinquents
so long ago descend? — Why? — unless
under the action of natural and indefeasible hereditary rights
rights of a complexion more sacred complexion than that
of any which human laws can create. Apply Turn now
these pretended natural rights, will 20 years more
will



Identifier: | JB/032/003/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 32.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

032

Main Headings

civil code

Folio number

003

Info in main headings field

civil

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f5 / f6 / f7 / f8

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::l munn [britannia with shield emblem]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

benjamin constant

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

9974

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in