JB/035/052/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/035/052/001: Difference between revisions

Lea Stern (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Lea Stern (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:
<head>Juries</head><lb/>
<head>Juries</head><lb/>


<P><del>In <unclear>pronouncing</unclear> examining</del><lb/> In <del>judging of</del> <add><del>discussing</del></add> <add>examining into</add> the utility of this mode of trial<lb/> with reference <add>to the nature of things, and </add>to the present circumstance of France,<lb/> <del>with <unclear>refer</unclear> as an ingredient in the new constitution </del> <lb/> forming for France, <add>my first care shall be to clear the <lb/> subject of </add><del>I shall take care to <gap/><lb/> all circumstances inessential to the institution </del> all <lb/>accidental and inessential <del><unclear>circumstances</unclear></del> <!-- best guess --> <add>accompaniments.</add> I shall<lb/> lay aside therefore on the one hand <del>the inessential</del> <add>such defects<lb/>  as are not essential to the institution</add> circumstances of inconvenience with which it <unclear>can not</unclear> <add>remains</add><lb/> <unclear>prescient</unclear> <gap/>: on the other hand <add>all such founts of <lb/> <del>which, which </del> advantage as though accidentally combined with it, <lb/> have naturally no more connection with this than <lb/>than with any other plan of judicature.</add><lb/> <del>the advantageous <lb/> circumstances that have taken accidentally to have been <lb/>  <add>do not belong to it.</add> combined with those <unclear>stances</unclear> of judicature: <add>temporary</add> <unclear>but examin'd</unclear>  </del><lb/> combine full as well with a proven number <gap/>
<p><del>In <unclear>pronouncing</unclear> examining</del><lb/> In <del>judging of</del> <add><del>discussing</del></add> <add>examining into</add> the utility of this mode of trial<lb/> with reference <add>to the nature of things, and </add>to the present circumstance of France,<lb/> <del>with <unclear>refer</unclear> as an ingredient in the new constitution </del> <lb/> forming for France, <add>my first care shall be to clear the <lb/> subject of </add><del>I shall take care to <gap/><lb/> all circumstances inessential to the institution </del> all <lb/>accidental and inessential <del><unclear>consecutants</unclear></del> <!-- best guess --> <add>accompaniments.</add> I shall<lb/> lay aside therefore on the one hand <del>the inessential</del> <add>such defects<lb/>  as are not essential to the institution</add> circumstances of inconvenience with which it <unclear>can not</unclear> <add>remains</add><lb/> <unclear>prescient</unclear> <gap/>: on the other hand <add>all such founts of <lb/> <del>which, which </del> advantage as though accidentally combined with it, <lb/> have naturally no more connection with this than <lb/>than with any other plan of judicature.</add><lb/> <del>the advantageous <lb/> circumstances that have taken accidentally to have been <lb/>  <add>do not belong to it.</add> combined with those <unclear>stances</unclear> of judicature: <add>temporary</add> <unclear>but examin'd</unclear>  <lb/> combine full as well with a proven number under neither the laws</del>
</p>


 
<p>To do it all possible justice I have applied<lb/> what seemed to me the best remedy to such features <lb/> in its <add>present frame</add> as appeared <del>to me defective</del>:<note>to stand in need of amendment, and to be <add>capable</add> <del><unclear>receptive</unclear> </del> of <del>it</del> receiving it. </note> and it is in <lb/>this improved state that I sit in <sic>judgement</sic> over<lb/> <del>it</del> <add>the institution</add> to <sic>enquire</sic> whether upon any and what terms <lb/>it <del>it</del> promises to be <sic>introduceable</sic> with advantage <lb/>into the <del>French</del> Law <del>.</del> of France.  </p><pb/>  
 
 
<p>To do it all possible justice I have applied<lb/> what seemed to me the best remedy to such features <lb/> in its <add>present frame</add> as apeared <del>to me defective</del>:<note>to stand in need of amendment, and to be <add>capable</add> <del><unclear>receptive</unclear> </del> of <del>it</del> receiving it. </note> and it is in <lb/>this improved state that I sit in <sic>judgement</sic> over<lb/> <del>it</del> <add>the institution</add> to <sic>enquire</sic> whether upon any and what terms <lb/>it <del>it</del> promises to be <sic>introduceable</sic> with advantage <lb/>into the <del>French</del> Law <del>.</del> of France.  </p><pb/>  





Revision as of 01:19, 1 March 2011

Click Here To Edit

This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet

Juries

In pronouncing examining
In judging of discussing examining into the utility of this mode of trial
with reference to the nature of things, and to the present circumstance of France,
with refer as an ingredient in the new constitution
forming for France, my first care shall be to clear the
subject of
I shall take care to
all circumstances inessential to the institution
all
accidental and inessential consecutants accompaniments. I shall
lay aside therefore on the one hand the inessential such defects
as are not essential to the institution
circumstances of inconvenience with which it can not remains
prescient : on the other hand all such founts of
which, which advantage as though accidentally combined with it,
have naturally no more connection with this than
than with any other plan of judicature.

the advantageous
circumstances that have taken accidentally to have been
do not belong to it. combined with those stances of judicature: temporary but examin'd
combine full as well with a proven number under neither the laws

To do it all possible justice I have applied
what seemed to me the best remedy to such features
in its present frame as appeared to me defective:to stand in need of amendment, and to be capable receptive of it receiving it. and it is in
this improved state that I sit in judgement over
it the institution to enquire whether upon any and what terms
it it promises to be introduceable with advantage
into the French Law . of France.


---page break---





Identifier: | JB/035/052/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 35.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

1-3

Box

035

Main Headings

constitutional code; evidence; procedure code

Folio number

052

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f1 / f2 / f3 / f4

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::l munn [britannia with shield emblem]]]

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

benjamin constant

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

10645

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in