JB/139/021/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/139/021/001: Difference between revisions

Lea Stern (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Lea Stern (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 17: Line 17:
2. Evil of<lb/>
2. Evil of<lb/>
<head>29 or 5</head><lb/> <p>Proportioned to the <lb/> practical importance<lb/> of the subject are both<lb/> these evils.</p><pb/><!-- end of 1st column -->
<head>29 or 5</head><lb/> <p>Proportioned to the <lb/> practical importance<lb/> of the subject are both<lb/> these evils.</p><pb/><!-- end of 1st column -->
<head>Ch. Pauls Style.</head><lb/><head>(Obscurity disproves unfinished)</head><lb/><head>30 or 6</head> <lb/>
<p>In so far as such<lb/> failure has place, the<lb/> <hi rend='underline'>means</hi> are ill adapted<lb/> to their end.</p>
<head>31 or 7</head><lb/>
<p>To employ means ill<lb/> adapted to the end <lb/>is to be deficient in <lb/>wisdom: if they are<lb/> known to be so and<lb/> the end known to be <lb/>good - an ordinary benevolence.<head>32 or 8</head>
<lb/> <p>Under such deficiencies<lb/> how can any discourses<lb/> be now believed<lb/> to be the results<lb/> of a special commission<lb/> from God?</p><head>33 or 9.</head><lb/>
<p>Objection - difficult<lb/> as are these discourses <lb/>they <sic>admitt</sic> of some <lb/>explanation: some<lb/> explanation given, <lb/>difficulty is at <del>one</del>  an <lb/>end.</p><head>34 or 10.</head>
<p>Answer. (Saving conception <lb/>of which <sic>aftwds</sic>)<lb/> <hi rend='underline'>explanation</hi> is <hi rend='underline'>substitution</hi><lb/> by it the obscurity<lb/> or ambiguity<lb/> i e  the imperfection is <lb/>admitted. </p>





Revision as of 19:31, 3 March 2011

Click Here To Edit

This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet

1817 Aug. 30 3
Not Paul

Ch. Paul's Style
Obscurity disproves inspiration
25 or 1.

In Paul's discourses
are characters disproving
the supposition
of special commission
from God
Principal & obscurity

26 or 2

To all persons for
whose use it is designed
the conception
conveyed by a discourse
should be clear, correct
and compleat as may be.

27 or 3

Only in proportion
as it is understood
can any good expected
from it be produced.

28 or 4

Evils produced in so
far as it fails of being
understood—
1. Evil of
2. Evil of
29 or 5

Proportioned to the
practical importance
of the subject are both
these evils.


---page break---

Ch. Pauls Style.
(Obscurity disproves unfinished)
30 or 6

In so far as such
failure has place, the
means are ill adapted
to their end.

31 or 7

To employ means ill
adapted to the end
is to be deficient in
wisdom: if they are
known to be so and
the end known to be
good - an ordinary benevolence.32 or 8

Under such deficiencies
how can any discourses
be now believed
to be the results
of a special commission
from God?

33 or 9.

Objection - difficult
as are these discourses
they admitt of some
explanation: some
explanation given,
difficulty is at one an
end.

34 or 10.

Answer. (Saving conception
of which aftwds)
explanation is substitution
by it the obscurity
or ambiguity
i e the imperfection is
admitted.





Identifier: | JB/139/021/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 139.

Date_1

1817-08-30

Marginal Summary Numbering

25 or 1 - 39 or 15

Box

139

Main Headings

not paul but jesus

Folio number

021

Info in main headings field

not paul

Image

001

Titles

ch. paul's style / obscurity disproves inspiration

Category

marginal summary sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d4 / e5 / f90

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

47398

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in