★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
<p>Objection - difficult<lb/> as are these discourses <lb/>they <sic>admitt</sic> of some <lb/>explanation: some<lb/> explanation given, <lb/>difficulty is at <del>one</del> an <lb/>end.</p><head>34 or 10.</head> | <p>Objection - difficult<lb/> as are these discourses <lb/>they <sic>admitt</sic> of some <lb/>explanation: some<lb/> explanation given, <lb/>difficulty is at <del>one</del> an <lb/>end.</p><head>34 or 10.</head> | ||
<p>Answer. (Saving conception <lb/>of which <sic>aftwds</sic>)<lb/> <hi rend='underline'>explanation</hi> is <hi rend='underline'>substitution</hi><lb/> by it the obscurity<lb/> or ambiguity<lb/> i e the imperfection is <lb/>admitted. </p> <pb/> <!-- end of 2nd column --> | <p>Answer. (Saving conception <lb/>of which <sic>aftwds</sic>)<lb/> <hi rend='underline'>explanation</hi> is <hi rend='underline'>substitution</hi><lb/> by it the obscurity<lb/> or ambiguity<lb/> i e the imperfection is <lb/>admitted. </p> <pb/> <!-- end of 2nd column --> | ||
<head>Ch Pauls Style.</head><lb/><head>Obscurity disproved inspiration></head><lb/><head>35 or 11</head><lb/> | |||
<p><foreign>Conseditur</foreign>— By <lb/>length of time and <lb/> change of circumstance <lb/>(i e deprivation of a<lb/> temporary explanatory<lb/> circumstance)<lb/> what was clear might <lb/>be rendered obscure<lb/> or ambiguous</p> | |||
<head>36 or 12</head><lb/> | |||
<p>But the Vindication <lb/>applies not beyond <lb/>the particular facts <lb/>thus obscured. On the<lb/> defender it rests to<lb/> <sic>shew</sic> that by that<lb/> course not by deficiency <lb/>in ability or probity<lb/> the obscurity was <lb/> produced.</p> | |||
<head>37 or 13</head><lb/> | |||
<p>By no such supposition<lb/> can obscurity<lb/> be consistent with the <lb/> supposition of dictation<lb/> by God. Employing<lb/> means <sic>unsufficient</sic> to the end<lb/> can never be reconcilable <lb/>to the supposition <lb/> of infinite wisdom.</p> | |||
<head>38 or 14</head><lb/> | |||
<p><sic>Irreconcileable</sic> is the<lb/> supposition of the name<lb/> of divine wisdom <add>and</add> benevolence<lb/> <add>as</add> obscurity: <pb/><!-- end of column --> | |||
<head><sic>Pauls</sic> Style.</head><lb/> | |||
<head>38 or 14 continued</head><lb/> | |||
<add>it</add> is altogether | |||
This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet
1817 Aug. 30 3
Not Paul
Ch. Paul's Style
Obscurity disproves inspiration
25 or 1.
In Paul's discourses
are characters disproving
the supposition
of special commission
from God
Principal & obscurity
26 or 2
To all persons for
whose use it is designed
the conception
conveyed by a discourse
should be clear, correct
and compleat as may be.
27 or 3
Only in proportion
as it is understood
can any good expected
from it be produced.
28 or 4
Evils produced in so
far as it fails of being
understood—
1. Evil of
2. Evil of
29 or 5
Proportioned to the
practical importance
of the subject are both
these evils.
---page break---
Ch. Pauls Style.
(Obscurity disproves unfinished)
30 or 6
In so far as such
failure has place, the
means are ill adapted
to their end.
31 or 7
To employ means ill
adapted to the end
is to be deficient in
wisdom: if they are
known to be so and
the end known to be
good - an ordinary benevolence.32 or 8
Under such deficiencies
how can any discourses
be now believed
to be the results
of a special commission
from God?
33 or 9.
Objection - difficult
as are these discourses
they admitt of some
explanation: some
explanation given,
difficulty is at one an
end.
34 or 10.
Answer. (Saving conception
of which aftwds)
explanation is substitution
by it the obscurity
or ambiguity
i e the imperfection is
admitted.
---page break---
Ch Pauls Style.
Obscurity disproved inspiration>
35 or 11
Conseditur— By
length of time and
change of circumstance
(i e deprivation of a
temporary explanatory
circumstance)
what was clear might
be rendered obscure
or ambiguous
36 or 12
But the Vindication
applies not beyond
the particular facts
thus obscured. On the
defender it rests to
shew that by that
course not by deficiency
in ability or probity
the obscurity was
produced.
37 or 13
By no such supposition
can obscurity
be consistent with the
supposition of dictation
by God. Employing
means unsufficient to the end
can never be reconcilable
to the supposition
of infinite wisdom.
38 or 14
Irreconcileable is the
supposition of the name
of divine wisdom and benevolence
as obscurity:
---page break---
Pauls Style.
38 or 14 continued
it is altogether
|
Identifier: | JB/139/021/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 139. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1817-08-30 |
25 or 1 - 39 or 15 |
||
|
139 |
not paul but jesus |
||
|
021 |
not paul |
||
|
001 |
ch. paul's style / obscurity disproves inspiration |
||
|
marginal summary sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
d4 / e5 / f90 |
||
|
47398 |
|||
---page break---
---page break---
-->
