JB/104/085/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/104/085/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
Phil.fawcet (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
6 Aug 1811 4
Fallacies
Generalia
Ch. Parts b<gap/>


4
In the case of the fabricator, a correspondent intention &#x2014;
an intention to which the same attribute evil may
with propriety be applies, is implied when that sam
attribute is applied toe the subject of consciousness.
On the part of the fabricator in the case of the bad shilling suppose the absence
of all intention to make in the way of utterance undue profit by the article
so fabricated, it is not merely the mere circumstance of his knowing the mere consciousness knowledge
of its badness the article to be bad in the character of a shilling suffices
not of itself to warrant the attaching to it his consciousness that reproachful
attribute.
6
In fabrication case
consciousness is not
evil, without evil
intention.
Shilling bad &#x2014; no intention
to make undue
profit of it, in the
consciousness of its
badness nothing evil.
In general this evilness of intention this
concomitant accompaniment of evil intention will not be wanting
to the consciousness. But : but cases may put, nor those
by any means unexampled ones, in which the intention to the intention
no such reproachful spillins has justly been attributable
has not been evil.
7
Generalities <gap/>
seriousness of the badness
present, evil intention
will not be absent.
But in particular
cases, yes
1. The intention in which it was made, was that
of serving for a button: that it bears a certain degree degree
of resemblance to many a piece of metal which <gap/>
is in the habit of being passed for a shilling is a circumstance
of which he is not unconscious: but <gap/> that it
should be passed as such either by himself or by any
other person, was a circumstance result that in the intention of the man had never
entered into his intention had never found a place. By accident, it finds its
way into hand, by in which, with or without the circumstance
of evil consciousness with or without the circumstance of culpable blamable
ignorance or attention it has obtains currency in that character.
8
Example 1. Button.
Resemblance of a plain
button to do shilling
known to fabricator,
yet to pass it for such
was not his intention.
By accident, with or
without negligence on
his part, it fell into
the hands of an Utterer
who passed it.
Utterer (who to be so
must first have been acceptor)
may in each
character have ben
evilly-conscious or not,
and if not, h<gap/>
(thence blamable,
or unblameable.




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 08:32, 24 June 2018

Click Here To Edit

6 Aug 1811 4 Fallacies Generalia Ch. Parts b

4

In the case of the fabricator, a correspondent intention — an intention to which the same attribute evil may with propriety be applies, is implied when that sam attribute is applied toe the subject of consciousness.

On the part of the fabricator in the case of the bad shilling suppose the absence of all intention to make in the way of utterance undue profit by the article so fabricated, it is not merely the mere circumstance of his knowing the mere consciousness knowledge of its badness the article to be bad in the character of a shilling suffices not of itself to warrant the attaching to it his consciousness that reproachful attribute.

6 In fabrication case consciousness is not evil, without evil intention. Shilling bad — no intention to make undue profit of it, in the consciousness of its badness nothing evil.

In general this evilness of intention this concomitant accompaniment of evil intention will not be wanting to the consciousness. But : but cases may put, nor those by any means unexampled ones, in which the intention to the intention no such reproachful spillins has justly been attributable has not been evil.

7 Generalities seriousness of the badness present, evil intention will not be absent. But in particular cases, yes

1. The intention in which it was made, was that of serving for a button: that it bears a certain degree degree of resemblance to many a piece of metal which is in the habit of being passed for a shilling is a circumstance of which he is not unconscious: but that it should be passed as such either by himself or by any other person, was a circumstance result that in the intention of the man had never entered into his intention had never found a place. By accident, it finds its way into hand, by in which, with or without the circumstance of evil consciousness with or without the circumstance of culpable blamable ignorance or attention it has obtains currency in that character.

8 Example 1. Button. Resemblance of a plain button to do shilling known to fabricator, yet to pass it for such was not his intention. By accident, with or without negligence on his part, it fell into the hands of an Utterer who passed it. Utterer (who to be so must first have been acceptor) may in each character have ben evilly-conscious or not, and if not, h (thence blamable, or unblameable.



Identifier: | JB/104/085/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 104.

Date_1

1811-08-06

Marginal Summary Numbering

6-8

Box

104

Main Headings

fallacies

Folio number

085

Info in main headings field

fallacies

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d4 / e4

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

34056

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in