JB/104/087/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/104/087/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
Phil.fawcet (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>6 Aug. 1811 9</p>
<head>Fallacies</head>
<note>Generalia<lb/>
Ch. Parts bearable</note>


<p>9</p>
<p><hi rend="underline"><sic>Imbecillity</sic></hi>, the judgment is chargeable with <hi rend="underline"><sic>inbecillity</sic></hi>, when<lb/>
being <unclear>never</unclear> the opinions uttered have for its cause <hi rend="underline">prejudice</hi> <del>in</del> authority<lb/>
in a case which called for examination and self-framed judgments<lb/>
If the opinion is erroneous, here is <hi rend="underline">temerity</hi>, and that temerity a<lb/>
mark of <sic>imbecillity</sic>.<lb/>
In the <hi rend="underline"><unclear>literature</unclear></hi> here in question, viz. legislatorship, <add>to act <unclear>from</unclear> against relevant arguments</add>
prejudice is obtainable in every<lb/>
man, or from authority except in the cases to a narrow extent in which <del><gap/> <gap/> <gap/></del> <add>absence of self <unclear>service</unclear> is not blameable.</add></p>
<p><del><gap/></del> Supposing, <del>it</del> in the case of any man and<lb/>
any opinion, that it is by the force of authority and<lb/>
that when that it has obtained acceptance in his mind,<lb/>
what at any rate is known is that for its immediate<lb/>
<unclear>period</unclear> <del>it</del> <add>is</add> his <hi rend="underline">prejudice</hi>.</p>
<note>18<lb/>
Opinion embraced<lb/>
through deference to<lb/>
<hi rend="underline">authority</hi>, has for<lb/>
its immediate <unclear>point</unclear><lb/>
<hi rend="underline">prejudice</hi>, viz. in<lb/>
the <foreign>persona <hi rend="underline">in qu<gap/></hi></foreign></note>
<p>In the mind of him whose opinion is the source<lb/>
of this authority <add>persuasion</add> <add>&#x2014; upon whose credit upon the ground of</add> the opinion <del>may have been</del> through<lb/>
whose opinion <add>acceptance</add>, real or supposed <del>it</del> the acceptance has been<lb/>
<add>given to it through</add> by the supposition (unless in case of accidental misconception)<lb/>
professed, <add>it</add> may, at the <add>very</add> time of such profession, have been,<lb/>
or not have been, really entertained.</p>
<p>If, while <add>when</add> thus professed, it was not really entertained,<lb/>
the utterance of it was on <add>by</add> the supposition<lb/>
attended with the <add>habitude of the <unclear>times</unclear> above spoken of under the name of</add>
evil consciousness above spoken of.</p>
<note>19<lb/>
On the part of the<lb/>
<hi rend="underline"><foreign>persona <unclear>injus</unclear></foreign></hi> the<lb/>
profession of the opinion<lb/>
may have been sincere<lb/>
or insincere. <del><gap/></del><lb/>
&#x2014; if insincere, such<lb/>
utterer was <hi rend="underline">evilly<lb/>
-conscious</hi>.</note>
<p>In this case, sinister interest will in some shape or<lb/>
other have <del>been</del> in that place been the cause of the acceptance<lb/>
given to it: for without <add>an</add> interest, and that<lb/>
to which the epithet sinister may without cause of<lb/>
objection be applied, a man will not have recourse<lb/>
to insincerity, to deliberate <sic>falshood</sic> in that or any other<lb/>
shape.</p>
<note>20<lb/>
If so, if so &#x2014; the<lb/>
interest by which such<lb/>
<del><gap/></del> utterance was<lb/>
produced must<lb/>
have been <hi rend="underline">sinister</hi>.</note>




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 09:32, 25 June 2018

Click Here To Edit

6 Aug. 1811 9

Fallacies Generalia
Ch. Parts bearable

9

Imbecillity, the judgment is chargeable with inbecillity, when
being never the opinions uttered have for its cause prejudice in authority
in a case which called for examination and self-framed judgments
If the opinion is erroneous, here is temerity, and that temerity a
mark of imbecillity.
In the literature here in question, viz. legislatorship, to act from against relevant arguments prejudice is obtainable in every
man, or from authority except in the cases to a narrow extent in which absence of self service is not blameable.

Supposing, it in the case of any man and
any opinion, that it is by the force of authority and
that when that it has obtained acceptance in his mind,
what at any rate is known is that for its immediate
period it is his prejudice.

18
Opinion embraced
through deference to
authority, has for
its immediate point
prejudice, viz. in
the persona in qu

In the mind of him whose opinion is the source
of this authority persuasion — upon whose credit upon the ground of the opinion may have been through
whose opinion acceptance, real or supposed it the acceptance has been
given to it through by the supposition (unless in case of accidental misconception)
professed, it may, at the very time of such profession, have been,
or not have been, really entertained.

If, while when thus professed, it was not really entertained,
the utterance of it was on by the supposition
attended with the habitude of the times above spoken of under the name of evil consciousness above spoken of.

19
On the part of the
persona injus the
profession of the opinion
may have been sincere
or insincere.
— if insincere, such
utterer was evilly
-conscious
.

In this case, sinister interest will in some shape or
other have been in that place been the cause of the acceptance
given to it: for without an interest, and that
to which the epithet sinister may without cause of
objection be applied, a man will not have recourse
to insincerity, to deliberate falshood in that or any other
shape.

20
If so, if so — the
interest by which such
utterance was
produced must
have been sinister.



Identifier: | JB/104/087/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 104.

Date_1

1811-08-06

Marginal Summary Numbering

18-20

Box

104

Main Headings

fallacies

Folio number

087

Info in main headings field

fallacies

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d9 / e9

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

j whatman 1808

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

admiral pavel chichagov

Corrections

peregrine bingham

Paper Produced in Year

1808

Notes public

ID Number

34058

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in