JB/104/113/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/104/113/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
Phil.fawcet (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>20 July 1810 24</p>
<head>Fallacies</head>
<note>Ch. Authority worshppers<lb/>
§.4. <sic>Churchmens</sic> sinister interest</note>
 
<p>2</p>
 
<p>On any subject unconnected with religion, <del>[no<lb/>
one would suppose that]</del> on the question what<lb/>
ought to be law the <add>bare</add> opinion of a <lb/>
churchman <del>would</del><lb/>
is not likely <del><gap/></del> either to be delivered or to be received<lb/>
in the character of <add>an</add> authority any more than<lb/>
that of <add>a</add> any other man. <del>If emplo <add>in that character</add> attempted<lb/>
to be <gap/> employed, it would it is f<gap/><lb/>
in the character of a fallacy that it would be employed<lb/>
but presenting as prospect <add>probability</add> of operating in that<lb/>
character, it serves <add>applies</add> not in that case <gap/> in the<lb/>
character of an example of the species of fallacy<lb/>
here held up to view.</del></p>
 
<note><del><add>[+]</add> It would be in the<lb/>
character of a man<lb/>
of sense <add>knowledge</add> and probity<lb/>
and not in the character<lb/>
of a Churchman<lb/>
as such &#x2014;<lb/>
that his <add>bare</add> opinion<lb/>
if referred to under<lb/>
any expectation of<lb/>
its influencing the<lb/>
decision would<lb/>
be <gap/> employed.</del></note>
 
<note>3<lb/>
On a question unconnected<lb/>
with religion<lb/>
reference to Churchmans<lb/>
opinion <hi rend="underline">as<lb/>
such</hi> &#x2014; as authority<lb/>
can scarcely be considered<lb/>
<!-- This note continues below the marginal addition above -->
as a fallacy:<lb/>
it not being likely<lb/>
to be considered as<lb/>
constitution of <hi rend="underline">authority</hi></note>
 
<p>To understand how <del>unfit it is that</del> great<lb/>
the probability of deception would be if on the<lb/>
question what in matters of religion ought to be<lb/>
law the opinion delivered by a Churchman <del>who<lb/>
ought as such to be</del> were to be regarded as authority<lb/>
and in such were <add>admitted by a man</add> to <del>exercise an</del> influence<lb/>
<del>on</del> his decision independently of any <unclear>specific</unclear><lb/>
reason <del><add>arguments</add></del> with which it might <del>happen to it to</del><lb/>
be accompanied it is necessary to <del>understand</del> <add>have a clear conception of</add><lb/>
the nature and force of the sinister interest to the<lb/>
action of which in the present state of ecclesiastical<lb/>
law a person in that situation stands<lb/>
exposed.</p>
 
<note>4<lb/>
To the question<lb/>
what in matters of<lb/>
religion ought to be<lb/>
law follow the<lb/>
nature and force<lb/>
of the sinister interest<lb/>
by which<lb/>
any declaration of<lb/>
opinion from such<lb/>
a quarter is devoid<lb/>
of all <gap/> <gap/> <gap/></note>





Revision as of 09:06, 16 July 2018

Click Here To Edit

20 July 1810 24

Fallacies Ch. Authority worshppers
§.4. Churchmens sinister interest

2

On any subject unconnected with religion, [no
one would suppose that]
on the question what
ought to be law the bare opinion of a
churchman would
is not likely either to be delivered or to be received
in the character of an authority any more than
that of a any other man. If emplo in that character attempted
to be employed, it would it is f
in the character of a fallacy that it would be employed
but presenting as prospect probability of operating in that
character, it serves applies not in that case in the
character of an example of the species of fallacy
here held up to view.

[+] It would be in the
character of a man
of sense knowledge and probity
and not in the character
of a Churchman
as such —
that his bare opinion
if referred to under
any expectation of
its influencing the
decision would
be employed.

3
On a question unconnected
with religion
reference to Churchmans
opinion as
such
— as authority
can scarcely be considered
as a fallacy:
it not being likely
to be considered as
constitution of authority

To understand how unfit it is that great
the probability of deception would be if on the
question what in matters of religion ought to be
law the opinion delivered by a Churchman who
ought as such to be
were to be regarded as authority
and in such were admitted by a man to exercise an influence
on his decision independently of any specific
reason arguments with which it might happen to it to
be accompanied it is necessary to understand have a clear conception of
the nature and force of the sinister interest to the
action of which in the present state of ecclesiastical
law a person in that situation stands
exposed.

4
To the question
what in matters of
religion ought to be
law follow the
nature and force
of the sinister interest
by which
any declaration of
opinion from such
a quarter is devoid
of all




Identifier: | JB/104/113/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 104.

Date_1

1810-07-20

Marginal Summary Numbering

3-4

Box

104

Main Headings

fallacies

Folio number

113

Info in main headings field

fallacies

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d24 / e2

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

th 1806

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

andre morellet

Corrections

peregrine bingham

Paper Produced in Year

1806

Notes public

ID Number

34084

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in