JB/104/142/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/104/142/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
Phil.fawcet (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>18 July 1810 July 18 A + + §.1 4<del><gap/></del><lb/>
Fallacies</head>
<note>48<lb/>
<gap/><lb/>
Ch. Authority-worshippers<lb/>
§.8. Where fallacies <gap/><lb/>
<gap/></note>
 
<p><!-- This paragraph has been struck through in pencil -->
1. Relation between this and Ancestor worshippers<lb/>
<!-- In a box in top right corner: -->
1 It supposes those addressed in <gap/><lb/>
to <gap/> their own judgment: good though<lb/>
where this <hi rend="underline">is</hi> the <unclear>end</unclear>.<lb/>
<del>2. Good no <gap/><gap/> and other <gap/> of <gap/></del><lb/>
3. Good under Unwritten law is the question what <hi rend="underline">is</hi> law<lb/>
<del>4. Good in legislation <gap/><gap/> appropriate physical science is</del> necessary<lb/>
bad in d<hi rend="superscript">o</hi> so far as the opinion of a lawyer is the opinion <del><gap/></del> <add>referred</add><lb/>
in this character.<lb/>
5. Good <gap/> in legislation so far as the opinion <gap/> against the<lb/>
<del><gap/></del> interest of the profession: viz: as a personality <add><gap/><gap/><gap/></add>, and in answer to <gap/><lb/>
-authority <gap/> <del><gap/></del> &#x2014;  against discussion <note>&#x2014; oppose it to the opposition<lb/>
to Romillys cap.<lb/>
punishment Bill.</note><lb/>
6. Bad in religion: inconsistent in <del><gap/></del> <hi rend="underline">Anglican</hi> <unclear>month</unclear><lb/>
<del>7. <gap/> <add>Considitur</add> is good and no fallacy when <gap/><gap/><gap/><lb/>
instead of <gap/>, but as to a place where arguments <gap/><lb/>
<gap/> at large and in order.</del></p>
 
<p><del>Ch. Authority-worshippers <add><gap/></add> device.</del><lb/>
<!-- Pointer symbol --> What follows in these two Sections having been written a year before<lb/>
the matter of the preceding Sections, see how far it is capable of combining with it</p>
 
<p>§.8. Proposition &#x2014; In what cases this argument is fallacious, in what not.</p>
 
<p><!-- This paragraph has been struck through in pencil -->
[<del>Quoting a</del> To quote an authority or authorities<lb/>
to refer to the opinion of this or that <hi rend="underline">person</hi><lb/>
(this or that <hi rend="underline">writer</hi> he must have been if any <del><gap/></del> <add>sufficient</add> <add>adequate</add><lb/>
adequately <add>sufficiently</add> grounded dependence be placed upon the<lb/>
words stated as being <add>his</add> expression of his opinion <add>sentiments</add> unless<lb/>
being <add>on the occasion</add> a speaker his words have been taken down<lb/>
in short hand)]</p>
 
<note>1<lb/>
Reference to opinion<lb/>
&#x2014; to authority &#x2014; is<lb/>
fallacy or not, according<lb/>
to circumstances.</note>
 
<p><add>It is only after certain distinctions made</add> <add>considerable</add> <add>limitations and</add> <add>exceptions made that</add> To refer to the opinion of this or that person<lb/>
as constituting an authority <add>upon the subject</add> as an opinion which<lb/>
independently of any argument contained in it is<lb/>
<del>fit</del> on the occasion in question fit to be taken <add>as a ground</add> for a<lb/>
guide <add>of decision</add> is a practice <add>to</add> which <del>according to the</del> any<lb/>
such <del><gap/></del> <add>dyslogistic</add> appellation as <hi rend="underline">fallacy</hi> or <hi rend="underline">device</hi> can <del>not</del><lb/>
with reason be attributed. According to the nature<lb/>
of the subject matter, <add>[+]</add><lb/>
<note><add>[+]</add> and some other<lb/>
circumstances</note><lb/>
it constitutes a reasonable <add>serves or helps to constitute a rational</add> ground<lb/>
of decision, or belongs to the list of fallacies.</p>





Revision as of 09:30, 7 August 2018

Click Here To Edit

18 July 1810 July 18 A + + §.1 4
Fallacies
48

Ch. Authority-worshippers
§.8. Where fallacies

1. Relation between this and Ancestor worshippers
1 It supposes those addressed in
to their own judgment: good though
where this is the end.
2. Good no and other of
3. Good under Unwritten law is the question what is law
4. Good in legislation appropriate physical science is necessary
bad in do so far as the opinion of a lawyer is the opinion referred
in this character.
5. Good in legislation so far as the opinion against the
interest of the profession: viz: as a personality , and in answer to
-authority — against discussion — oppose it to the opposition
to Romillys cap.
punishment Bill.

6. Bad in religion: inconsistent in Anglican month
7. Considitur is good and no fallacy when
instead of , but as to a place where arguments
at large and in order.

Ch. Authority-worshippers device.
What follows in these two Sections having been written a year before
the matter of the preceding Sections, see how far it is capable of combining with it

§.8. Proposition — In what cases this argument is fallacious, in what not.

[Quoting a To quote an authority or authorities
to refer to the opinion of this or that person
(this or that writer he must have been if any sufficient adequate
adequately sufficiently grounded dependence be placed upon the
words stated as being his expression of his opinion sentiments unless
being on the occasion a speaker his words have been taken down
in short hand)]

1
Reference to opinion
— to authority — is
fallacy or not, according
to circumstances.

It is only after certain distinctions made considerable limitations and exceptions made that To refer to the opinion of this or that person
as constituting an authority upon the subject as an opinion which
independently of any argument contained in it is
fit on the occasion in question fit to be taken as a ground for a
guide of decision is a practice to which according to the any
such dyslogistic appellation as fallacy or device can not
with reason be attributed. According to the nature
of the subject matter, [+]
[+] and some other
circumstances

it constitutes a reasonable serves or helps to constitute a rational ground
of decision, or belongs to the list of fallacies.




Identifier: | JB/104/142/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 104.

Date_1

1810-07-18

Marginal Summary Numbering

1

Box

104

Main Headings

fallacies

Folio number

142

Info in main headings field

fallacies

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d44 / e1

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

th 1806

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

andre morellet

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1806

Notes public

"what follows in these two sections having been written a year before the matter of the preceding sections, see how far it is capable of continuing with it"

ID Number

34113

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in