JB/104/143/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/104/143/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
Phil.fawcet (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>1819 Aug. 11 + + + §.1 1<lb/>
Fallacies</head>
<note>5<lb/>
Ch. 5. 1. Authority Worshippers<lb/>
§.1. Exposition <gap/></note>
 
<p>1 1</p>
 
<p><!-- Pointer symbol --> 19 Aug. 1819. Doubtful whether this can be usefully employed<lb/>
till the marginals of the old matter have been taken cognizance of.</p>
 
<p>§.1. Exposition &#x2014; distinction between legitimate and illegitimate use of authority<lb/>
Topics <del>not</del> for consideration</p>
 
<note>1<lb/>
Necessary preliminary<lb/>
distinction &#x2014; that between<lb/>
the legitimate and<lb/>
illegitimate use of<lb/>
authority in <unclear>argument</unclear></note>
 
<p><del>Before the exposure <add>any clear view</add> can be made of the deception</del><lb/>
Before <del>the exposure belonging to this head can be<lb/>
given <add>made</add> &#x2014; before</del> any clear view can be given of the deception<lb/>
liable to be produced by the abuse of the species of argument<lb/>
here in <del>question</del> question, it will be necessary to bring to view<lb/>
the distinction between the legitimate and the illegitimate use<lb/>
of it: to <sic>shew</sic> in what cases the judgment may be assisted<lb/>
in what other cases perverted by it.</p>
 
<p><!-- This line in pencil --> For the purpose of clearly exhibiting the</p>
 
<note>2<lb/>
Topics for consideration<lb/>
1. Judgments influencible,<lb/>
which<lb/>
2. Field of the influence<lb/>
what &#x2014;<lb/>
3. <gap/><gap/><gap/><lb/>
4. <gap/><gap/><gap/><!-- Text in 3 and 4 appears to have been erased at this point. Notes continue below additions 3 and 4 transcribed below --><lb/>
3. Judgments influencing<lb/>
or sources of the influence<lb/>
or <hi rend="underline">Quality</hi> of the mass<lb/>
of authority, what<lb/>
4. Number of the judgments<lb/>
influenced<lb/>
or Quantity <gap/><lb/>
<gap/><gap/><gap/></note>
 
<p><del>Before</del> the distinction between the legitimate and the illegitimate use <del>of it <gap/></del> <add>authority</add><lb/>
<del>be can be made clear</del>, it will be necessary <del>in relation <add>reference</add><lb/>
to the argument that argument from authority</del> to <add>have in</add> view the four <add>following</add> topics<lb/>
<del>following</del>: namely: 1. the <hi rend="underline">persons</hi> on <del>whom</del> <add>whose minds</add> it may be<lb/>
made or contended to operate <add>[+]1</add><lb/>
<note><add>[+]1</add> Say for shortness the<lb/>
<del><gap/></del> <hi rend="underline">judgments influencible</hi></note>:,<lb/>
2 the <hi rend="underline">subjects</hi> or subject matters <del><add>that part of the field of thought and</add></del> in<lb/>
<del><add>action</add></del> relation to or on <del><gap/></del> occasion of which it may be made or<lb/>
intended to operate <add>[+]2</add><lb/>
<note><add>[+]2</add> Say for shortness the <hi rend="underline">field</hi><lb/>
<hi rend="underline">of the influence</hi></note>;<lb/>
3. the <hi rend="underline">sources</hi> from whence it may<lb/>
happen to it to be derived: namely the persons whose<lb/>
judgments, real or supposed, are employed to influence the<lb/>
judgments <del><gap/></del> operated or meant to be operated upon <add>[+]3</add><lb/>
<note><add>[+]3</add> Say for shortness, the<lb/>
<add><hi rend="underline">quality of the</hi></add> judgments <hi rend="underline">influencing</hi></note>;<lb/>
4. the<lb/>
<del>influence which</del> dependence which the quantity of the effect<lb/>
may have on the number of the persons whose influence is<lb/>
thus endeavoured to be employed. <add>[+]4</add><lb/>
<note><add>[+]4</add> Say for shortness the<lb/>
<hi rend="underline">quantity of the mass of<lb/>
authority</hi>.</note></p>
 
<p><del>In <gap/> <add>(a)</add> For shortness, let any one that pleases, say<lb/>
Say the <hi rend="underline"><foreign>persona <gap/> in quas</foreign></hi><lb/>
<add>(b)</add> Say the <hi rend="underline"><foreign>persona cajus</foreign></hi>.</del></p>





Revision as of 09:35, 8 August 2018

Click Here To Edit

1819 Aug. 11 + + + §.1 1
Fallacies
5
Ch. 5. 1. Authority Worshippers
§.1. Exposition

1 1

19 Aug. 1819. Doubtful whether this can be usefully employed
till the marginals of the old matter have been taken cognizance of.

§.1. Exposition — distinction between legitimate and illegitimate use of authority
Topics not for consideration

1
Necessary preliminary
distinction — that between
the legitimate and
illegitimate use of
authority in argument

Before the exposure any clear view can be made of the deception
Before the exposure belonging to this head can be
given made — before
any clear view can be given of the deception
liable to be produced by the abuse of the species of argument
here in question question, it will be necessary to bring to view
the distinction between the legitimate and the illegitimate use
of it: to shew in what cases the judgment may be assisted
in what other cases perverted by it.

For the purpose of clearly exhibiting the

2
Topics for consideration
1. Judgments influencible,
which
2. Field of the influence
what —
3.
4.
3. Judgments influencing
or sources of the influence
or Quality of the mass
of authority, what
4. Number of the judgments
influenced
or Quantity

Before the distinction between the legitimate and the illegitimate use of it authority
be can be made clear, it will be necessary in relation reference
to the argument that argument from authority
to have in view the four following topics
following: namely: 1. the persons on whom whose minds it may be
made or contended to operate [+]1
[+]1 Say for shortness the
judgments influencible
:,
2 the subjects or subject matters that part of the field of thought and in
action relation to or on occasion of which it may be made or
intended to operate [+]2
[+]2 Say for shortness the field
of the influence
;
3. the sources from whence it may
happen to it to be derived: namely the persons whose
judgments, real or supposed, are employed to influence the
judgments operated or meant to be operated upon [+]3
[+]3 Say for shortness, the
quality of the judgments influencing
;
4. the
influence which dependence which the quantity of the effect
may have on the number of the persons whose influence is
thus endeavoured to be employed. [+]4
[+]4 Say for shortness the
quantity of the mass of
authority
.

In (a) For shortness, let any one that pleases, say
Say the persona in quas
(b) Say the persona cajus.




Identifier: | JB/104/143/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 104.

Date_1

1819-08-11

Marginal Summary Numbering

1-2

Box

104

Main Headings

fallacies

Folio number

143

Info in main headings field

fallacies

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c1 / d1 / e1

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

"doubtful whether this can be usefully employed till the marginals of the old matter have been taken cognizance of"

ID Number

34114

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in