JB/104/180/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/104/180/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
Phil.fawcet (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>10 July 1810 4<lb/>
Fallacies</head>
<note>Ins or Eitherside<lb/>
Ch. Causes &amp; Obstacles<lb/>
§. Universities. I. Virtue</note>


<p>2</p>
<note>3<lb/>
<unclear>Oaths</unclear> &#x2014; assertory<lb/>
and promissory &#x2014;<lb/>
are both assertory &#x2014;<lb/>
but <add>of</add> the simply<lb/>
assertory <unclear>there</unclear> <del><gap/></del><lb/>
be but one sort<lb/>
of breach viz.<lb/>
at that one time<lb/>
of promissory, that<lb/>
and another breach<lb/>
at any other time<lb/>
&#x2014; viz. non existence<lb/>
of intention to maintain<lb/>
the line of conduct<lb/>
promised, or<lb/>
subsequent departure<lb/>
from it.</note>
<p>An oath <add>Oaths</add>, according to the nature of the proposition<lb/>
<add>for</add> the truth of which it is employed to afford <add>find</add> <add>ensure</add> security<lb/>
is distinguished <add>are divided</add> into assertory and promissory.</p>
<p><del><gap/></del> In strictness the distinction is not a <add>perfectly</add> correct<lb/>
one: since <add>forasmuch as</add> <del>what is done, and all</del> <add>by the sort of oath called</add> by a promissory<lb/>
oath all that is done all that can be done is<lb/>
to convey <add>give</add> intimation of the <add>present</add> existence of a matter<lb/>
of fact <add>as</add> having place at that moment in the mind<lb/>
of him who swears <add>officiates</add> <add>whose discourse it is</add>, viz. an intention of maintaining<lb/>
the line of conduct <add>so</add> promised to be maintained<lb/>
Between the two species of oaths, the true <add>real</add> distinction<lb/>
lies &#x2014; not in this viz. that the one contains an<lb/>
assertion, the other not, but [in the different <del><gap/> <gap/></del> <add>modes of</add><lb/>
violation of which they are respectively susceptible.]</p>
<p>In the case of the simply assertory or assertive oath,<lb/>
<del>the oath</del> there is but but one way <add>mode</add> in which the oath<lb/>
can be violated, perjury committed: viz. if of any<lb/>
part of the matter of fact represented by the swearer<lb/>
as believed by him to be true, there be any part in<lb/>
respect of which he <del>maintains the opposite</del> belief <add>either fails of entertaining such persuasion</add>, or<lb/>
much more if he entertains the opposite belief if the<lb/>
opposite persuasion be that which he entertains.</p>
<p>The promissory oath on the other hand is understood<lb/>
to be violated in either of two cases: 1. if even<lb/>
at the very time of <del>prom</del> uttering the promise to maintain<lb/>
the line of conduct undertaken for <add>so promised</add>, the intention<lb/>
of <unclear>maintaining</unclear> it is in any part wanting, or if at <add>on the</add><lb/>
<add>part of the person in question</add> any future point of time any <del>line of conduct</del> <add>point</add> <add>all</add> opposite to or<lb/>
inconsistent with the line of conduct so undertaken for, comes<lb/>
<add>eventually</add><lb/>
<note>eventually <add>in the event</add> knowingly<lb/>
and willingly to be<lb/>
performed.</note></p>




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 09:07, 31 August 2018

Click Here To Edit

10 July 1810 4
Fallacies
Ins or Eitherside
Ch. Causes & Obstacles
§. Universities. I. Virtue

2

3
Oaths — assertory
and promissory —
are both assertory —
but of the simply
assertory there
be but one sort
of breach viz.
at that one time
of promissory, that
and another breach
at any other time
— viz. non existence
of intention to maintain
the line of conduct
promised, or
subsequent departure
from it.

An oath Oaths, according to the nature of the proposition
for the truth of which it is employed to afford find ensure security
is distinguished are divided into assertory and promissory.

In strictness the distinction is not a perfectly correct
one: since forasmuch as what is done, and all by the sort of oath called by a promissory
oath all that is done all that can be done is
to convey give intimation of the present existence of a matter
of fact as having place at that moment in the mind
of him who swears officiates whose discourse it is, viz. an intention of maintaining
the line of conduct so promised to be maintained
Between the two species of oaths, the true real distinction
lies — not in this viz. that the one contains an
assertion, the other not, but [in the different modes of
violation of which they are respectively susceptible.]

In the case of the simply assertory or assertive oath,
the oath there is but but one way mode in which the oath
can be violated, perjury committed: viz. if of any
part of the matter of fact represented by the swearer
as believed by him to be true, there be any part in
respect of which he maintains the opposite belief either fails of entertaining such persuasion, or
much more if he entertains the opposite belief if the
opposite persuasion be that which he entertains.

The promissory oath on the other hand is understood
to be violated in either of two cases: 1. if even
at the very time of prom uttering the promise to maintain
the line of conduct undertaken for so promised, the intention
of maintaining it is in any part wanting, or if at on the
part of the person in question any future point of time any line of conduct point all opposite to or
inconsistent with the line of conduct so undertaken for, comes
eventually
eventually in the event knowingly
and willingly to be
performed.



Identifier: | JB/104/180/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 104.

Date_1

1810-07-10

Marginal Summary Numbering

3

Box

104

Main Headings

fallacies

Folio number

180

Info in main headings field

fallacies

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d4 / e2

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

34151

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in