JB/104/386/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/104/386/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
Phil.fawcet (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>1 July 1811 8</head>
 
<note>Note<lb/>
V. <foreign>ad superstitionem</foreign><lb/>
Ch. Generalia<lb/>
Exposition</note>
 
<p>8</p>
 
<!-- The following paragraph has been struck out in pencil -->
<p>1. <unclear>People</unclear> &#x2014; H. of C. had no share in the making it.<lb/>
2. The greatest part <unclear>violated</unclear> by <sic>extention</sic> of subject matter<lb/>
3. Too inexplicit in general to be serviceable<lb/>
4. <del>When</del> In so far as explicit <sic>compleatly</sic> and constantly violated, mixt<lb/>
<gap/> <gap/></p>
 
<note>15 <add>(a)</add><lb/>
Of the particular <gap/><lb/>
views to be perpetuated,<lb/>
the <gap/><lb/>
was useless to the<lb/>
public interest, serviceable<lb/>
to his own.<lb/>
1. H. of C. not parties to it<lb/>
2. Reply useless by <sic>extention</sic><lb/>
of subject matter<lb/>
3. Re<gap/> too inexplicit<lb/>
to be serviceable<lb/>
4 &#x2014; and with his concurrance<lb/>
habitually<lb/>
violated.</note>
 
<p>As to the individual law <add>document</add> pitched upon <add>chosen</add> by him for<lb/>
a subject to work <add>operate</add> upon and for an instrument to work<lb/>
with, how useless <add>inapposite</add> so ever with relation <add>reference</add> to the advantage<lb/>
of the people, it was not the less apposite to <del>his</del> his <add>the lawyers</add> purposes<lb/>
as above indicated <add>brought to view</add>.</p>
 
<p><!-- Written in faint pencil: --> Go on</p>





Revision as of 08:06, 24 January 2019

Click Here To Edit

1 July 1811 8

Note
V. ad superstitionem
Ch. Generalia
Exposition

8

1. People — H. of C. had no share in the making it.
2. The greatest part violated by extention of subject matter
3. Too inexplicit in general to be serviceable
4. When In so far as explicit compleatly and constantly violated, mixt

15 (a)
Of the particular
views to be perpetuated,
the
was useless to the
public interest, serviceable
to his own.
1. H. of C. not parties to it
2. Reply useless by extention
of subject matter
3. Re too inexplicit
to be serviceable
4 — and with his concurrance
habitually
violated.

As to the individual law document pitched upon chosen by him for
a subject to work operate upon and for an instrument to work
with, how useless inapposite so ever with relation reference to the advantage
of the people, it was not the less apposite to his his the lawyers purposes
as above indicated brought to view.

Go on




Identifier: | JB/104/386/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 104.

Date_1

1811-07-01

Marginal Summary Numbering

15a

Box

104

Main Headings

fallacies

Folio number

386

Info in main headings field

fallacies

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c8 / e8

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

th 1806

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

andre morellet

Corrections

peregrine bingham

Paper Produced in Year

1806

Notes public

ID Number

34357

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in