JB/135/049/004: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/135/049/004: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>CONDUCT</head>
<p>they have shewn the advantage of this method<lb/>
but have <unclear>capped</unclear> that this method<lb/>
does not come up to Euclid's in point<lb/>
of accuracy to all Quantities whatever<lb/>
to Incommensurables. What I have done<lb/>
is to <del><gap/></del> attempt to shew <add>prove</add> <del>that</del> first<lb/>
that this method will <gap/> <gap/> in theory<lb/>
the accuracy of Practice, and secondly<lb/>
that Euclid's method <del>was <gap/></del> is at<lb/>
last subject to the same inaccuracy<lb/>
and in short that it depends on<lb/>
the new method.</p>
 
<p>It has been the general consensus for Authors<lb/>
on this subject (as <unclear>last</unclear>) to make some Apology<lb/>
for <gap/> the Number of Books on the Subject, in<lb/>
better <gap/> to give a general description of that wherein his<lb/>
work <unclear>differ</unclear> than that of others on the same subject.<lb/> Whenever I got over a difficulty I endeavored to<lb/>
find what it was that had caused it. I<lb/>
noticed it, with a view of clearing out of<lb/>
the way of others. This is an advantage<lb/>
which as a learner I had over <del>any other</del><lb/>
I believe I may say any other, <del>Masters</del> <add>those</add><lb/>
who write upon a subject one in general<lb/>
Masters, much as once arrived at an age and<lb/>
at a dexterity of handling the subjects as to<lb/>
have forgotten this difficulty, which <unclear>at</unclear><lb/>
attended them when learners.</p>     





Revision as of 08:34, 17 January 2017

Click Here To Edit

CONDUCT

they have shewn the advantage of this method
but have capped that this method
does not come up to Euclid's in point
of accuracy to all Quantities whatever
to Incommensurables. What I have done
is to attempt to shew prove that first
that this method will in theory
the accuracy of Practice, and secondly
that Euclid's method was is at
last subject to the same inaccuracy
and in short that it depends on
the new method.

It has been the general consensus for Authors
on this subject (as last) to make some Apology
for the Number of Books on the Subject, in
better to give a general description of that wherein his
work differ than that of others on the same subject.
Whenever I got over a difficulty I endeavored to
find what it was that had caused it. I
noticed it, with a view of clearing out of
the way of others. This is an advantage
which as a learner I had over any other
I believe I may say any other, Masters those
who write upon a subject one in general
Masters, much as once arrived at an age and
at a dexterity of handling the subjects as to
have forgotten this difficulty, which at
attended them when learners.




Identifier: | JB/135/049/004"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 135.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

135

Main Headings

Folio number

049

Info in main headings field

conduct

Image

004

Titles

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f13 / f14 / f15 / f16

Penner

sir samuel bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[gr with crown] [pro patria motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

46167

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in