★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
Auto loaded |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
' | <p>1831 Aug. 25</p> | ||
<head>Posology</head> | |||
<note>Alegomorphics<lb/> | |||
§. Bookkeping<lb/> | |||
elucidated<lb/> | |||
Hamilton's 8 Rules</note> | |||
<p>3</p> | |||
<head>Natural Expression</head> | |||
<p>Hamilton p 478 12</p> | |||
<p>1. Bought wine for ready money</p> | |||
<p>2 Sold wine ("rum") for ready money</p> | |||
<p>3. <del><gap/></del> Delivered <del><gap/></del> so much<lb/> | |||
wine at so much for so much<lb/> | |||
<del><gap/></del> other wine received, at<lb/> | |||
so much received</p> | |||
<p>4.1. Bought for ready money "silk".</p> | |||
<p>5.2. Sold for ready money "pepper"</p> | |||
<p>6.3. <del><gap/></del> Delivered <del><gap/></del> ("bartered) linen<lb/> | |||
<add>at so much</add> for flax at so much</p> | |||
<p>7.4. "Sold for ready money a share<lb/> | |||
ex N<gap/> Blackfield the whole<lb/> | |||
value of which is so much</p> | |||
<p>8.5. Bought for ready money so<lb/> | |||
much South-Sea S<gap/>, at<lb/> | |||
so much</p> | |||
<p>9.6. Delivered "Paid" for a share<lb/> | |||
in a shop in b<gap/> — so much<lb/> | |||
what</p> | |||
<!-- Horizontal line --> | |||
<head>Notes</head> | |||
<p>When the wine is sold for ready<lb/> | |||
money the presumption is that both<lb/> | |||
were delivered at the same time.<lb/> | |||
But this is not expressed. Yet it<lb/> | |||
ought to be expressed. For if either<lb/> | |||
of the article remains <unclear>undelivered, things</unclear><lb/> | |||
the corresponding one was delivered<lb/> | |||
so long as this is the case, the non-<lb/> | |||
delivering party is really a Debtor<lb/> | |||
to the others. Hence the the statement<lb/> | |||
remains ambiguous. This ambiguity<lb/> | |||
is cleared away by the <gap/> expression</p> | |||
<p>The six following "examples" as<lb/> | |||
they are called can not but be intended<lb/> | |||
as example of that same <gap/> <gap/><lb/> | |||
for of the 4<hi rend="superscript">th</hi> Rule no <unclear>mention</unclear> is made<lb/> | |||
till after the last of these six examples<lb/> | |||
is concluded.</p><pb/> | |||
<head>Technical Expression</head> | |||
<p>Rule III "A thing received<lb/> | |||
"is Debtor to the thing<lb/> | |||
"given for it."</p> | |||
<p>1. Wine Debtor to cash</p> | |||
<p>2. Cash Debtor to rum</p> | |||
<p>3. Rum Debtor to wine</p> | |||
<!-- Horizontal line --> | |||
<p>☞ In II six following Natural<lb/> | |||
expression. In technical expression<lb/> | |||
are five. What should they be?<lb/> | |||
<del>For <gap/> <gap/> Natural expressions<lb/> | |||
no technical expressions<lb/> | |||
are given</del></p> | |||
<!-- Horizontal line --> | |||
<p>In words is there in any<lb/> | |||
of those <gap/> any s<gap/><lb/> | |||
made by the use of the<lb/> | |||
technical expressions? No.<lb/> | |||
On the contrary often <del><gap/></del> and<lb/> | |||
<add>in addition to it</add> technical expression comes<lb/> | |||
the <del><gap/></del> natural one.</p> | |||
1831 Aug. 25
Posology
Alegomorphics
§. Bookkeping
elucidated
Hamilton's 8 Rules
3
Natural Expression
Hamilton p 478 12
1. Bought wine for ready money
2 Sold wine ("rum") for ready money
3. Delivered so much
wine at so much for so much
other wine received, at
so much received
4.1. Bought for ready money "silk".
5.2. Sold for ready money "pepper"
6.3. Delivered ("bartered) linen
at so much for flax at so much
7.4. "Sold for ready money a share
ex N Blackfield the whole
value of which is so much
8.5. Bought for ready money so
much South-Sea S, at
so much
9.6. Delivered "Paid" for a share
in a shop in b — so much
what
Notes
When the wine is sold for ready
money the presumption is that both
were delivered at the same time.
But this is not expressed. Yet it
ought to be expressed. For if either
of the article remains undelivered, things
the corresponding one was delivered
so long as this is the case, the non-
delivering party is really a Debtor
to the others. Hence the the statement
remains ambiguous. This ambiguity
is cleared away by the expression
The six following "examples" as
they are called can not but be intended
as example of that same
for of the 4th Rule no mention is made
till after the last of these six examples
is concluded.
---page break---
Technical Expression
Rule III "A thing received
"is Debtor to the thing
"given for it."
1. Wine Debtor to cash
2. Cash Debtor to rum
3. Rum Debtor to wine
☞ In II six following Natural
expression. In technical expression
are five. What should they be?
For Natural expressions
no technical expressions
are given
In words is there in any
of those any s
made by the use of the
technical expressions? No.
On the contrary often and
in addition to it technical expression comes
the natural one.
|
Identifier: | JB/135/150/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 135. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1831-08-25 |
|||
|
135 |
posology |
||
|
150 |
posology |
||
|
001 |
natural expression / technical expression / notes |
||
|
rudiments sheet (brouillon) |
1 |
||
|
recto |
e3 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
street & co 1830 |
||
|
antonio alcala galiano |
|||
|
1830 |
|||
|
46268 |
|||
