★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
"Vesting the power of displacing in different hands from the power of appointing" |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
'''[{{fullurl:JB/087/104/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '''[{{fullurl:JB/087/104/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
< | <p>Vesting the power of displacing in different hands<lb/>from the power of appointing</p> | ||
<p>This idea I take from a very ingenious<lb/>state paper published in America. <add><del>The use of this arrangement is +</del></add><note>+ The title of <del>it</del> <add>the original paper</add> is Result<lb/>of the Convention of Delegates<lb/><unclear>holden</unclear> at Ipswich in the<lb/>County of Essex, who were<lb/>deputed to take into consideration<lb/>the Constitution<lb/>and form of government<lb/>proposed by the Convention<lb/>of the State of Massachusetts<lb/>Bay Apr. 29 1778.<lb/> Republished in <unclear>Almon's</unclear><lb/><unclear>Rememberancer</unclear> N<hi rend="superscript">o</hi> 84<lb/> p. 223.</note> | |||
</p> | |||
<p>A man's pride is <add>it is <unclear>then</unclear> <gap/></add> interested in not condemning<lb/><note><unclear>Almon's</unclear><unclear>Rememberancer</unclear><lb/><del>p. 22</del> N<hi rend="superscript">o</hi> 84 p. 223</note> his own <unclear>device</unclear> <add>Independent of affection</add> He will therefore be <add>get to be</add> more<lb/>backward in <del>displacing the man</del> giving ear to any<lb/>complaints against the <add>subordinate</add> person appointed than another<lb/>person would, and very probably than he ought.<lb/>This consideration will help account for <del>the incapacity</del> <add>whatever</add><lb/>bad conduct is to be observed in monarchical<lb/>states when great powers are given to<lb/>single persons in subordinate stations without witness<lb/>or contract other than that of the person to<lb/>whom they owe their office. <add>But</add> the less the share<lb/>is which any one person has in the appointment<lb/>of such subordinate, the less strongly is his<lb/>pride inherited in the affair: <del>insomuch that when</del><lb/>and when the appointment <del>by</del> <add>in virtue</add> the number of hands<lb/>it is vested in stands upon the footing of a popular<lb/>election, this source of illusion seems scarcely<lb/>to have place.</p> | |||
<p>There is a reason it is to be opined, <add>for</add> why another<lb/><add>besides</add> them the person appointing should have the<lb/><lb/>power of displacing, not <add>against</add> why he should have <add>it should not be <unclear>converted</unclear> when</add></p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | ||
Vesting the power of displacing in different hands
from the power of appointing
This idea I take from a very ingenious
state paper published in America. The use of this arrangement is ++ The title of it the original paper is Result
of the Convention of Delegates
holden at Ipswich in the
County of Essex, who were
deputed to take into consideration
the Constitution
and form of government
proposed by the Convention
of the State of Massachusetts
Bay Apr. 29 1778.
Republished in Almon's
Rememberancer No 84
p. 223.
A man's pride is it is then interested in not condemning
Almon'sRememberancer
p. 22 No 84 p. 223 his own device Independent of affection He will therefore be get to be more
backward in displacing the man giving ear to any
complaints against the subordinate person appointed than another
person would, and very probably than he ought.
This consideration will help account for the incapacity whatever
bad conduct is to be observed in monarchical
states when great powers are given to
single persons in subordinate stations without witness
or contract other than that of the person to
whom they owe their office. But the less the share
is which any one person has in the appointment
of such subordinate, the less strongly is his
pride inherited in the affair: insomuch that when
and when the appointment by in virtue the number of hands
it is vested in stands upon the footing of a popular
election, this source of illusion seems scarcely
to have place.
There is a reason it is to be opined, for why another
besides them the person appointing should have the
power of displacing, not against why he should have it should not be converted when
|
Identifier: | JB/087/104/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 87. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
087 |
indirect legislation |
||
|
104 |
indirect |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
4 |
||
|
recto |
f9 / f10 / f11 / f12 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [britannia with shield motif]]] |
||
|
27629 |
|||
