JB/014/037/001: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 16:56, 5 March 2017

Proportioned to the differences between the particular
sensibilities of the several persons in question will be the
absurdity of him who, in the character of a moralist,
should prescribe really the same line of conduct to be observed should in the character of a moralist or any a Deontologistshould in a case in which the agent himself was the only person whose well-being was in question
by every man.

With a benefit of a certain degree of experience
every man is a better judge of what is most conduciveit may be delivered in its character of a general proposition
to his own well-being than any other man can be.

Identifier: \| JB/014/037/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 14.
Date_1	1814-08-30	Marginal Summary Numbering
Box	014	Main Headings	deontology
Folio number	037	Info in main headings field	logic or deontology
Image	001	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	c2 / e2
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks	[[watermarks::[prince of wales feathers] mj&l 1811]]
Marginals		Paper Producer	colonel aaron burr
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year	1811
Notes public		ID Number	4800
Box Contents

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 '''[{{fullurl:JB/014/037/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
 <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
-<p><gap/> to the differences between the particular<lb/>sensibilities of the <unclear>normal</unclear> <unclear>person</unclear> in question will be<lb/>the <unclear>absurdity</unclear> of <unclear>him</unclear> <del><gap/></del> who, <del>in the character of a <gap/></del>,<lb/><gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <unclear>case</unclear> in which the <unclear>agen<del>t</del></unclear> <del>him</del>self?? was the only person<lb/><gap/> <gap/> <gap/> the same <gap/> of <unclear>conduct</unclear> <add><gap/> in the character of a <unclear>member</unclear> or <gap/> a <gap/></add> to be observed<lb/>by every man.</p>
+<p>Proportioned to the differences between the particular<lb/>sensibilities of the several persons in question will be the<lb/>absurdity of him <del><gap/></del> who, <del>in the character of a moralist</del>,<lb/><del>should</del> prescribe <unclear>really</unclear> the same line of conduct to be observed <add>should in the character of a moralist or any a Deontologist</add><add><del>should</del> in a case in which the agent <del>him</del>self was the only person whose well-being was in question</add><lb/>by every man.</p>
-<p>With a benefit of a certain degree of <gap/><lb/>every man is a better judge of what is most <unclear>conducive</unclear> <add>it may be <unclear>delivered</unclear> in the character of a general <unclear>proposition</unclear></add><lb/>to his own well-being then any other man can be.</p>
+<p>With a benefit of a certain degree of experience<lb/>every man is a better judge of what is most conducive<add>it may be delivered in its character of a general proposition</add><lb/>to his own well-being than any other man can be.</p>
 <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
 {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Views

JB/014/037/001: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 16:56, 5 March 2017

Navigation

Search