JB/169/013/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/169/013/001: Difference between revisions

Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 8: Line 8:
<p>Dear Sir</p>
<p>Dear Sir</p>


I am much obliged to you for the<lb/>
<p>I am much obliged to you for the<lb/>
trouble you have so kindly taken on my account.<lb/>
trouble you have so kindly taken on my account.<lb/>
I am also obliged to the Gentleman<lb/>
I am also obliged to the Gentleman<lb/>
Line 15: Line 15:
To be plain with you <add>it is some years since</add><del>I have given some</del><lb/>
To be plain with you <add>it is some years since</add><del>I have given some</del><lb/>
<del>practise for some years</del>. As the Gentleman  seems<lb/>
<del>practise for some years</del>. As the Gentleman  seems<lb/>
disposed to take a man's writings for a specimen<lb/>
of his ability as an Advocate, suppose you were<lb/>
to mention to him M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Lind? He is called to<lb/>
the <gap/> and practices.</p>
<p>I have heard from several quarters of the Fragments<lb/>
being attributed to various persons of distinction<lb/>
once to L<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> Mansfield: several times<lb/>
to L<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> Camden and M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Dunning. I would<lb/>
wish for the present not to dissipate so favourable<lb/>
an illusion. I could wish therefore that your answer<lb/>
<add>to the Gentleman</add> might be to the effect abovementioned  without<lb/>
entering into any explanation by which it<lb/>
would appear manifest to him that the Fragment<lb/>
belongs not to any of those great names.</p><pb/>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 09:13, 6 May 2017

Click Here To Edit

To Elmsly in answer to a Letter received from him
Novr 27
1776

Dear Sir

I am much obliged to you for the
trouble you have so kindly taken on my account.
I am also obliged to the Gentleman
you mention for his intended favour. I am
flatter'd by his good opinion: but I take no Briefs.
To be plain with you it is some years sinceI have given some
practise for some years. As the Gentleman seems
disposed to take a man's writings for a specimen
of his ability as an Advocate, suppose you were
to mention to him Mr Lind? He is called to
the and practices.

I have heard from several quarters of the Fragments
being attributed to various persons of distinction
once to Ld Mansfield: several times
to Ld Camden and Mr Dunning. I would
wish for the present not to dissipate so favourable
an illusion. I could wish therefore that your answer
to the Gentleman might be to the effect abovementioned without
entering into any explanation by which it
would appear manifest to him that the Fragment
belongs not to any of those great names.


---page break---



Identifier: | JB/169/013/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 169.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

169

Main Headings

Folio number

013

Info in main headings field

to volt. &c

Image

001

Titles

Category

correspondence

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[gr with crown motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

letter 192, vol. 1

ID Number

57075002

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in