JB/135/019/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/135/019/002: Difference between revisions

Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 8: Line 8:
preferred</note><lb/>
preferred</note><lb/>
Those of Euclid should still <add>retain</add> their former names, as they <lb/>
Those of Euclid should still <add>retain</add> their former names, as they <lb/>
are refered to be those names form Books of Mechanics. &amp;</p>
are refered to be those names from Books of Mechanics. &amp;</p>
&#x2014;<lb/>
&#x2014;<lb/>
<p>2.  By the assistance f the Cards described Method 1<lb/>
<p>2.  By the assistance of the Cards described Method 1<gap/><lb/>
ThOrder of Prop: and Cor: may be changed so as to <note>Order how<lb/>
The Order of Prop: and Cor: may be changed so as to <note>Order how<lb/>
Changeable<lb/>
Changeable<lb/>
at pleasure<lb/>
at pleasure<lb/>
Line 18: Line 18:
genera &amp; species, <del>and</del> By this means each parcel<lb/>
genera &amp; species, <del>and</del> By this means each parcel<lb/>
may be made equally perfect.  For Ex: if after having<lb/>
may be made equally perfect.  For Ex: if after having<lb/>
divided Triangles and Parallelograms into 2 parcels<lb/>
divided Triangles and Parallelograms into 2 Parcels<lb/>
you find that <del>for</del> Triangles as well as Parallelograms<lb/>
you find that <del>for</del> Triangles as well as Parallelograms<lb/>
upon the same bases &amp; between the same parallels<lb/>
upon the same bases &amp; between the same parallels<lb/>
are proved equal, But that Triangles only are <add>if on equal bases</add><lb/>
are proved equal, But that Triangles only are <add>if on equal bases</add><lb/>
proved equal, then you perceive that Parallelograms<lb/>
proved equal, then you perceive that Parallelograms<lb/>
should be proved equal under like circumstances</p>
should be proved equal under like circumstances.</p>
&#x2014;<lb/>
&#x2014;<lb/>
<p>3. Consider the different orders <hi rend="underline">Geometerical Tut</hi>hs have been <note>Different Classification<lb/>
<p>3. Consider the different orders <hi rend="underline">Geometerical Trut</hi>hs have been <note>Different Classification<lb/>
of Different Authors</note><lb/>
of Different Authors</note><lb/>
disposed in, by different Authors, and the different ends they<lb/>
disposed in, by different Authors, and the different ends they<lb/>
Line 55: Line 55:
Natural History &amp; Legislation</p>
Natural History &amp; Legislation</p>
<p>It will appear very plain that Euclid could never<lb/>
<p>It will appear very plain that Euclid could never<lb/>
first thought of his Propositions in the order in<lb/>
have first thought of his Propositions in the order in<lb/>
which he has placed them.  but it is to be supposed he<lb/>
which he has placed them.  but it is to be supposed he<lb/>
he placed them in their present order for the purpose <lb/>
he placed them in their present order for the purpose <lb/>
Line 63: Line 63:
to be determined by the Order of Enquiry: for how should a man who had it<lb/>
to be determined by the Order of Enquiry: for how should a man who had it<lb/>
in other respects in his choice think if answering questions, but in <lb/>
in other respects in his choice think if answering questions, but in <lb/>
the order in which they were worked.</p><pb/>
the order in which they were asked.</p><pb/>





Revision as of 09:25, 7 May 2017

Click Here To Edit

CLASSIFICATION (I)

1. If it should be necessary to insert any new Propositions Euclids Order
preferred

Those of Euclid should still retain their former names, as they
are refered to be those names from Books of Mechanics. &


2. By the assistance of the Cards described Method 1
The Order of Prop: and Cor: may be changed so as to Order how
Changeable
at pleasure
Use of it

place all those together which relate to the several
genera & species, and By this means each parcel
may be made equally perfect. For Ex: if after having
divided Triangles and Parallelograms into 2 Parcels
you find that for Triangles as well as Parallelograms
upon the same bases & between the same parallels
are proved equal, But that Triangles only are if on equal bases
proved equal, then you perceive that Parallelograms
should be proved equal under like circumstances.


3. Consider the different orders Geometerical Truths have been Different Classification
of Different Authors

disposed in, by different Authors, and the different ends they
had in view in [purposes they have sought to compass by] such
different Dispositions.



---page break---

CLASSIFICATION (I)

The order necessary to be assumed for the purpose of demonstrating
the several Propositions is one thing.

Species of Order The order which would be most proper convenient & methodical
for the purpose of teachingthem (were the business only
to apprehend and retain them) would be another.

The order in which they occurred to the Inventor, probably
was a third, certainly it was different from the first.

Order of
1st Invention
Demonstration
Systematical
We have therefore (unless the two latter coincide) three
different species of Orders 1st the order of Demonstration.
2d the order of conception & retension 3dly the order of
Invention.

The 1st and only state in which Geometry has been
transmitted to us by the Antients is a state for advanced
towards perfection. I mean relatively according to the
order of demonstration, we see it not in this Science
in its first rude essays as we do those for example of
Natural History & Legislation

It will appear very plain that Euclid could never
have first thought of his Propositions in the order in
which he has placed them. but it is to be supposed he
he placed them in their present order for the purpose
of demonstration.

[+] as it may be termed The order of Simple or Authoritative Illustration [+] is the
Order of Instruction same with the Order of enquiry. It is in its Nature for Instruction
to be determined by the Order of Enquiry: for how should a man who had it
in other respects in his choice think if answering questions, but in
the order in which they were asked.


---page break---





Identifier: | JB/135/019/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 135.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

1-3

Box

135

Main Headings

Folio number

019

Info in main headings field

classification (i)

Image

002

Titles

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

sir samuel bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [with crown] [britannia motif]]]

Marginals

sir samuel bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

46137

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in