JB/014/424/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/014/424/001: Difference between revisions

Jgregor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Jgregor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 12: Line 12:


<gap/> at Queen's College Oxford the task<lb/>
<gap/> at Queen's College Oxford the task<lb/>
"was imposed on <del>him</del> <add>me</add> not indeed by <del>his</del> <add>my</add> academical instructors<lb/>
but by a not less irresistible authority the task<lb/>
of rendering into <del>Latin</del> <add>English</add> that work of <del>his</del> <add>Cicero</add> which is known<lb/>
by the title of The Tusculan Questions or Tusculan Disputations.<lb/>
Pain <del>he</del> <add>I</add> there learnt was no evil. Virtue was<lb/>
and is of itself sufficient to confer happiness on any man<lb/>
who is disposed to possess it on those terms. What benefit<lb/>
in any shape could be derived from impregnating<lb/>
the memory with such nonsense? what instruction<lb/>
from a self-contradictory proposition or any number<lb/>
of any such propositions? When it happens to a man<lb/>
to have a pain whether in the head or the great toe<lb/>
or any intermediary part of the bodily frame <del>is the seat<lb/>
of it is it in the nature of the case that</del> <add>can he</add> by saying<lb/>
to himself or to any body else <add>that</add> pain is no evil <add><del><gap/></del></add> <del>any<lb/>
the slightest diminution should be effected in it.</del>  <add>drive the pain away - or diminish it at all?</add><lb/>





Revision as of 15:50, 10 July 2017

Click Here To Edit

Long before this the mind of Mr Bentham had been
taken possession of by the Ulitarian Principle. At a very early age
he had been annoyed by and - & scarcely less annoyed than
disgusted, - by what he then called "Ciceronian trash"
"I had not completed my 13' year" to use his own words, "when at


at Queen's College Oxford the task
"was imposed on him me not indeed by his my academical instructors
but by a not less irresistible authority the task
of rendering into Latin English that work of his Cicero which is known
by the title of The Tusculan Questions or Tusculan Disputations.
Pain he I there learnt was no evil. Virtue was
and is of itself sufficient to confer happiness on any man
who is disposed to possess it on those terms. What benefit
in any shape could be derived from impregnating
the memory with such nonsense? what instruction
from a self-contradictory proposition or any number
of any such propositions? When it happens to a man
to have a pain whether in the head or the great toe
or any intermediary part of the bodily frame is the seat
of it is it in the nature of the case that
can he by saying
to himself or to any body else that pain is no evil any
the slightest diminution should be effected in it.
drive the pain away - or diminish it at all?




Identifier: | JB/014/424/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 14.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

014

Main Headings

deontology

Folio number

424a"a" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 424.

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

linking material

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f13

Penner

sir john bowring

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[partial hall]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

5187

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in