JB/042/015/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/042/015/001: Difference between revisions

Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:


<head>1827 Feb 8 +  +  Ch.</head>
<head>1827 Feb 8 +  +  Ch.</head>
<p>Constitutional Code <gap/> Aug. 24 This to be<lb/>
<p>Constitutional Code <gap/> 1828 Aug. 24 This to be<lb/>
preserved, in a Memorandum<lb/>
preserved, in a Memorandum<lb/>
(1) relative  to the copy sent to (4)<lb/>
(1) relative  to the copy sent to (4)<lb/>
Line 11: Line 11:
S2 the Legislative Minister</note><lb/>
S2 the Legislative Minister</note><lb/>


<p>Art. 23.  <del>Why An</del> <add>What an amendment</add> alteration why not <unclear>receivable</unclear><lb/>
<p>Art. 23.  <del>Why An</del> <add>Why an amendment</add> alteration why not <unclear>receivable</unclear><lb/>
in any other than the ready adapted form. Reasons</p>  
in any other than the ready adapted form. Reasons</p>  
<note>Art. 23. Ready written<lb/>
<note>Art. 23. Ready written<lb/>
Line 21: Line 21:
considered <lb/>
considered <lb/>
alternatives</note><lb/>
alternatives</note><lb/>
<p>1. Prevention of uncertainty  When this form the alternative<lb/>
<p>1. Prevention of uncertainty  When in this form the alternative<lb/>
proposed to be ready, is, <del>decided and</del> if the proposal be<lb/>
proposed to be made, is, <del>decided and</del> if the proposal be<lb/>
adapted, actually made, the parts
adopted, actually made, the parts meant to be affected by<lb/>
it, being expressly mentioned  <add>certainty is the consequence</add> when by a fresh Statute, the<lb/>
it, being expressly mentioned  <add>certainty is the consequence</add> when by a fresh Statute, the<lb/>
text of the body of law about it <add>a</add> app<gap/>lies to being left, un<gap/>lled<lb/>
text of the body of law about it <add>a</add> app<gap/>lies to being left, un<gap/>lled<lb/>
it may be a matter of doubt and dispute what are the parts<lb/>
it may be matter of doubt and dispute what are the parts<lb/>
meant to be affected.</p>
meant to be affected.</p>
<head>(2)<lb/>
<head>(2)<lb/>
Line 36: Line 36:
portion of the individuals whose interests are affected by<lb/>
portion of the individuals whose interests are affected by<lb/>
it.</p>
it.</p>
<p>To p.5</p>
&#x2014;<lb/>
&#x2014;<lb/>
<head>(4)<lb/>
<head>(4)<lb/>
Line 41: Line 42:
<p>From p..5</p>
<p>From p..5</p>
<del>3</del>. <add>Art 24</add> In the ordinary mode no such adaptation is made<lb/>
<del>3</del>. <add>Art 24</add> In the ordinary mode no such adaptation is made<lb/>
where the change is made by otherwise than by simple<lb/>
where the change is made <del>by</del> otherwise than by simple<lb/>
repeat or simple addition. In so far as substitution<lb/>
repeat or simple addition. In so far as substitution<lb/>
is intended, the effect produced in the <hi rend="underline">old</hi> matter by the <hi rend="underline">new</hi><lb/>
is intended, the effect produced in the <hi rend="underline">old</hi> matter by the <hi rend="underline">new</hi><lb/>
is left questionable and open to argument: and pages in<lb/>
is left questionable and open to argument: and pages in<lb/>
any number are employed to do that what would have  
any number are employed to do that what would have <lb/>
been more <del>officially</del><add>effectually</add> done by a single line.  [In English <add>(5)</add> Statute<lb/>
been more <del>officially</del><add>effectually</add> done by a single line.  [In English <add>(5)</add> Statute<lb/>
law in instance <del><gap/></del> what been observed in what <add>the amount<add><del><gap/></del></add></add> a page <gap/> is <note><gap/> Memorandum<lb/>
law in instance <del><gap/></del> what been observed in what <add>the amount<add><del><gap/></del></add></add> a page <gap/> is <note><gap/> Memorandum<lb/>
Line 55: Line 56:
included for the present<lb/>
included for the present<lb/>
occasion. but for the Code<lb/>
occasion. but for the Code<lb/>
only were in <gap/> former<lb/>
only were in <unclear>the</unclear> former<lb/>
&amp; <gap/> inserted b<gap/>e<lb/>
<unclear>Sheets</unclear> inserted be<lb/>
<gap/> of a Copyists</note><lb/>
<unclear>mistaken</unclear> of a Copyists</note><lb/>
employed in <del>the substitution of the</del> doing what would have<lb/>
employed in <del>the substitution of the</del> doing what would have<lb/>
been done by the substitution of the word <hi rend="underline">or</hi> to the word <hi rend="underline">and</hi><lb/>
been done by the substitution of the word <hi rend="underline">or</hi> to the word <hi rend="underline">and</hi><lb/>
<del><gap/></del> Great lengthiness is <add><gap/></add> produced by designating, <del><gap/></del>  as<lb/>
<del><gap/></del> Great lengthiness is <add><unclear>moreover</unclear></add> produced by designating, <del><gap/></del>  as<lb/>
otherwise there by <add>general and</add> <unclear>augue</unclear> disruptive, the matter to what other<lb/>
otherwise there by <add>general and</add> <unclear>vague</unclear> description, the matter to what other<lb/>
matter is intended to be substituted. "<hi rend="underline">So much</hi>" (in the whole<lb/>
matter is intended to be substituted. "<hi rend="underline">So much</hi>" (in the whole<lb/>
body of the law)" <hi rend="underline">as relates to</hi>" such or such a subject, naming it<lb/><pb/>
body of the law)" <hi rend="underline">as relates to</hi>" such or such a subject, naming it<lb/><pb/>

Revision as of 17:44, 16 July 2017

Click Here To Edit

1827 Feb 8 + + Ch.

Constitutional Code 1828 Aug. 24 This to be
preserved, in a Memorandum
(1) relative to the copy sent to (4)
Ratiocinative the Jury of the Netherlands

Ch. XI Ministers severable
S2 the Legislative Minister

Art. 23. Why An Why an amendment alteration why not receivable
in any other than the ready adapted form. Reasons

Art. 23. Ready written
form why necessitated
1. Prevention of uncertainty
2. Addition of needless
quantity
3. Severity against insufficiently
considered
alternatives

1. Prevention of uncertainty When in this form the alternative
proposed to be made, is, decided and if the proposal be
adopted, actually made, the parts meant to be affected by
it, being expressly mentioned certainty is the consequence when by a fresh Statute, the
text of the body of law about it a applies to being left, unlled
it may be matter of doubt and dispute what are the parts
meant to be affected.

(2)
Ratiocinative

2. Prevention of needless addition to the bulk of the Pannomiun
whereby by every such addition a proportionate
probability being produced of rendering a more or less considerable
portion of it incomprehensible to a more or less considerable
portion of the individuals whose interests are affected by
it.

To p.5


(4)
Instructional Exemplificational

From p..5

3. Art 24 In the ordinary mode no such adaptation is made
where the change is made by otherwise than by simple
repeat or simple addition. In so far as substitution
is intended, the effect produced in the old matter by the new
is left questionable and open to argument: and pages in
any number are employed to do that what would have
been more officiallyeffectually done by a single line. [In English (5) Statute
law in instance what been observed in what the amount<add></add> a page is Memorandum
In the copy sent at
the bottom of page 4
is inserted in J.B's
hand the following Note
These headings not been
included for the present
occasion. but for the Code
only were in the former
Sheets inserted be
mistaken of a Copyists

employed in the substitution of the doing what would have
been done by the substitution of the word or to the word and
Great lengthiness is moreover produced by designating, as
otherwise there by general and vague description, the matter to what other
matter is intended to be substituted. "So much" (in the whole
body of the law)" as relates to" such or such a subject, naming it

---page break---



Identifier: | JB/042/015/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 42.

Date_1

1827-02-08

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

042

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

015

Info in main headings field

constitutional code

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d4 / e4

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

j whatman turkey mill 1824

Marginals

Paper Producer

admiral pavel chichagov

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1824

Notes public

ID Number

12938

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in