JB/072/132/003: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/072/132/003: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
JFoxe (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/072/132/003|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/072/132/003|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<pb/>
 
<head><note>Inferenda.</note> Personal Injuries.</head>
 
<p><note><del>Errors.</del> <add>Strictures.</add> Consent no justification.</note> <sic>-ever</sic> sense there may be in it holds equally good, for<lb/>
the punishing a Surgeon for opening an <sic>absess</sic> or<lb/>
cutting off a limb. It could only be the utility of<lb/>
adhering to former decisions, an utility which supersedes<lb/>
every other, that determined a late respectable<lb/>
Judge to deliver the same opinion. In the case of<lb/>
Boulter against Clark <add>by way of defence against an action of Assault</add> proof was <sic>offerd</sic> that the<lb/>
fighting was be consent. <del>This proof</del> <add><del><gap/></del><gap/></add> L<hi rend='superscript'>d</hi> Ch. Bor.<lb/>
Parker would not suffer to be <del>given</del> proved, since<lb/>
if proved, it would not according to the above doctrine<lb/>
amount <add>serve as a</add> justification. <del>The case then was this.</del> <add>Thus then stands the case.</add><lb/>
<del>A man</del> Two men agree to <del>fight</del> box, for money<lb/>
or what <del>is</del> <add>happens</add> not <sic>unfrequently</sic> among the sturdy populace<lb/>
for reputation. Now what is the <del>substance</del> <add><unclear>purport</unclear></add> of<lb/>
this agreement? It is neither more nor less than<lb/>
not to have recourse to the Law. One of them is<lb/>
base enough to violate this agreement, and to claim<lb/>
of the Law a satisfaction for that which according<lb/>
to his own judgment was no wrong. <add>mischief to him.</add> <note>Dispensing with the Laws of Morality.</note> This baseness the<lb/>
Law countenances <add>joins in</add>, makes itself an accomplice <add>in</add> for the<lb/>
<del><gap/></del> <add>perfidy</add> and gives the <del><gap/></del> <add>betrayer</add> his reward. We see here<lb/>
one of those instances <del>un</del>happily but too numerous<lb/>
in which <note>by the blindness or pedantry of ..... Lawyers</note> the Political sanction is set <del>at variance</del> <add>in opposition to</add> with<lb/>
the moral, and [the Law employs itself to corrupt <add>where yet in Law itself that turns</add><lb/>
the <del>mora</del> manners of the people. <add>corrupter of the public morals.</add>]</p>
 
<p><note>Exempt. circumstances. Consent.</note> Whichever disposition of the Law may be most eligible<lb/>
on the general question whether consent shall operate<lb/>
as an exemptive circumstance, there is <sic>somthing</sic> peculiarly<lb/>
mischievous <add>inexpedient</add> in the mode of punishment<lb/>
established by the above decisions. The punishment<lb/>
is a pecuniary one, a penalty: and the mode of prosecution</p>


<pb/>




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 22:31, 1 April 2012

Click Here To Edit


---page break---

Inferenda. Personal Injuries.

Errors. Strictures. Consent no justification. -ever sense there may be in it holds equally good, for
the punishing a Surgeon for opening an absess or
cutting off a limb. It could only be the utility of
adhering to former decisions, an utility which supersedes
every other, that determined a late respectable
Judge to deliver the same opinion. In the case of
Boulter against Clark by way of defence against an action of Assault proof was offerd that the
fighting was be consent. This proof Ld Ch. Bor.
Parker would not suffer to be given proved, since
if proved, it would not according to the above doctrine
amount serve as a justification. The case then was this. Thus then stands the case.
A man Two men agree to fight box, for money
or what is happens not unfrequently among the sturdy populace
for reputation. Now what is the substance purport of
this agreement? It is neither more nor less than
not to have recourse to the Law. One of them is
base enough to violate this agreement, and to claim
of the Law a satisfaction for that which according
to his own judgment was no wrong. mischief to him. Dispensing with the Laws of Morality. This baseness the
Law countenances joins in, makes itself an accomplice in for the
perfidy and gives the betrayer his reward. We see here
one of those instances unhappily but too numerous
in which by the blindness or pedantry of ..... Lawyers the Political sanction is set at variance in opposition to with
the moral, and [the Law employs itself to corrupt where yet in Law itself that turns
the mora manners of the people. corrupter of the public morals.]

Exempt. circumstances. Consent. Whichever disposition of the Law may be most eligible
on the general question whether consent shall operate
as an exemptive circumstance, there is somthing peculiarly
mischievous inexpedient in the mode of punishment
established by the above decisions. The punishment
is a pecuniary one, a penalty: and the mode of prosecution


---page break---



Identifier: | JB/072/132/003"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 72.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

not numbered

Box

072

Main Headings

penal code

Folio number

132

Info in main headings field

personal injuries

Image

003

Titles

exemptive circumstances - consent

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e17 / e18 / / e20

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[gr with crown motif] pro patria [with motif]]]

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

23749

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in