JB/072/194/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/072/194/001: Difference between revisions

Zctyp18 (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
RexL (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:


<head>C <lb/>
<head>C <lb/>
Offences against one's Self. Paedersty<lb/></head>
Offences against one's Self. Paederasty<lb/></head>


<p>in favour of it <add>upon the subject</add> without taking notice of that circumstance.<lb/></p>
<p>in favour of it <add>upon the subject</add> without taking notice of that circumstance.<lb/></p>
Line 14: Line 14:
vice which would be [the destruction of, or at least would<lb/>
vice which would be [the destruction of, or at least would<lb/>
be] destructive to the human race if it were general.<lb/>
be] destructive to the human race if it were general.<lb/>
<foreign>Comment est-il <unclear>ju</unclear> faire qu'un vice destructeur <lb/> du genre humain, s'il fait general; qu'un <lb/>
<foreign>Comment s'est-il <unclear>pu</unclear> faire qu'un vice destructeur <lb/> du genre humain, s'il etait general; qu'un <lb/>
<unclear>allental</unclear> infame contre la nation, <gap/> pourlait si <lb/>
<unclear>allentat</unclear> infame contre la nation, soit pourtant si <lb/>
naturel?<add>+</add></foreign>. <del><gap/></del> A little further on speaking of <lb/>
naturel?<add>+</add></foreign>. <del><gap/></del> A little further on speaking of <lb/>
<gap/> Empiricus who would have us believe that the <lb/>
<unclear>Sextus</unclear> Empiricus who would have us believe that the <lb/>
<sic>practise</sic> was "recommended" <del><gap/></del> in Persia by the laws, <lb/>
<sic>practise</sic> was "recommended" <del><gap/></del> in Persia by the laws, <lb/>
he insists that the effect of such a law would be to <lb/>
he insists that the effect of such a law would be to <lb/>
annihilate that human race if it were literally <lb/>
annihilate that human race if it were literally <lb/>
observed. "Non, <add>(says he)</add> il n'est pas dans la nature humaine <lb/>
observed. "Non, <add>(says he)</add> il n'est pas dans la nature humaine <lb/>
"Je faire non loi qui contredit, il quit outrage la <lb/>
"de faire une loi qui contredit, &amp; qui outrage la <lb/>
"nature, une lui qui <unclear>ancontirait</unclear> le genre-humain <lb/>
"nature, une loi qui <unclear>ancontirait</unclear> le genre-humain <lb/>
"si elle etait observie a la lettre."  This consequence <lb/>
"si elle etait observee a la lettre."  This consequence <lb/>
however is far enough from being a necessary one. <lb/>
however is far enough from being a necessary one. <lb/>
For a law of the purport he represents to be should, <lb/>
For a law of the purport he represents to be observed, it <lb/>
is sufficient that this unprolific  
is sufficient that this unprolific kind of venery be practiced:<lb/>
it is not necessary that it should be practised to<lb/>
the exclusion of that which is prolific. Now That there<lb/>
should ever be wanting such a measure of the regular<lb/>
and ordinary inclination of desire for the proper object as<lb/>





Revision as of 04:22, 25 April 2015

Click Here To Edit

C
Offences against one's Self. Paederasty

in favour of it upon the subject without taking notice of that circumstance.

A notion more obvious, but perhaps not much
Whether it hurts population? better founded than the former is that of it's being
prejudicial to population. [+], for Voltaire appears
disinclined in one part of his works to give some
countenance to this opinion. He speaks of it as a
vice which would be [the destruction of, or at least would
be] destructive to the human race if it were general.
Comment s'est-il pu faire qu'un vice destructeur
du genre humain, s'il etait general; qu'un
allentat infame contre la nation, soit pourtant si
naturel?+
. A little further on speaking of
Sextus Empiricus who would have us believe that the
practise was "recommended" in Persia by the laws,
he insists that the effect of such a law would be to
annihilate that human race if it were literally
observed. "Non, (says he) il n'est pas dans la nature humaine
"de faire une loi qui contredit, & qui outrage la
"nature, une loi qui ancontirait le genre-humain
"si elle etait observee a la lettre." This consequence
however is far enough from being a necessary one.
For a law of the purport he represents to be observed, it
is sufficient that this unprolific kind of venery be practiced:
it is not necessary that it should be practised to
the exclusion of that which is prolific. Now That there
should ever be wanting such a measure of the regular
and ordinary inclination of desire for the proper object as




Identifier: | JB/072/194/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 72.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

not numbered

Box

072

Main Headings

penal code

Folio number

194

Info in main headings field

offences against one's self - paederasty

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f13 / f14 / / f16

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [britannia with shield emblem]]]

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

23811

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in