★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
the other.</p> | the other.</p> | ||
It is not <hi rend="underline"><add>that</add>because</hi> the first property <hi rend="underline">exists</hi> <add>in certain things</add> that the 2<hi rend="superscript">d</hi><lb/> | <p>It is not <hi rend="underline"><add>that</add>because</hi> the first property <hi rend="underline">exists</hi> <add>in certain things</add> that the 2<hi rend="superscript">d</hi><lb/> | ||
property exists in the same things [in which the first<lb/> | property exists in the same things [in which the first<lb/> | ||
does] but <hi rend="underline">because</hi> the first property can <hi rend="underline">be shewn</hi><lb/> | does] but <hi rend="underline">because</hi> the first property can <hi rend="underline">be shewn</hi><lb/> | ||
to exist <add>in the subject</add> that the second property can <hi rend="underline">be <sic>shewn</sic></hi> to exist<lb/> | to exist <add>in the subject</add> that the second property can <hi rend="underline">be <sic>shewn</sic></hi> to exist<lb/> | ||
in the same subject. It is not that the property<lb/> | in the same subject. It is not that the property<lb/> | ||
A <hi rend="underline">first</hi> existed <hi rend="underline">, and then <hi rend="underline">because</hi> it <hi rend="underline">existed</hi>, property<lb/> | |||
B came to <hi rend="underline">exist afterwards</hi>, but that property A was<lb/> | |||
first declared to exist is the thing in question ([ that is the<lb/> | |||
name in question was declared to be given to all these things<lb/> | |||
in which property A should be found) and <del>that</del> then afterwards<lb/> | |||
property B came to be seen to exist in<lb/> | |||
them.</p> | |||
of property A makes no difference. It is not that
It is not that one property flows from the other property,
but that it is by means of a things possessing
the one of these properties you can shew it to possess
the other.
It is not thatbecause the first property exists in certain things that the 2d
property exists in the same things [in which the first
does] but because the first property can be shewn
to exist in the subject that the second property can be shewn to exist
in the same subject. It is not that the property
A first existed , and then <hi rend="underline">because it existed, property
B came to exist afterwards, but that property A was
first declared to exist is the thing in question ([ that is the
name in question was declared to be given to all these things
in which property A should be found) and that then afterwards
property B came to be seen to exist in
them.
|
Identifier: | JB/135/059/003"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 135. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
not numbered |
|||
|
135 |
|||
|
059 |
geom. |
||
|
003 |
|||
|
copy/fair copy sheet |
4 |
||
|
recto |
|||
|
sir samuel bentham |
[[watermarks::[gr with crown] [pro patria motif]]] |
||
|
46177 |
|||
