JB/072/001/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/072/001/002: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
<hi rend='underline'>underlined text</hi>'''[{{fullurl:JB/072/001/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/072/001/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<head>INTRODUCTION<del>S</del>. LAW of NATIONS. no Law.</head><lb/> The Law of nations is<sic> nuthing</sic> more than a<lb/>system of rules declaring concerning the conduct<lb/>of nations with respect to each their ; rules<lb/>the practise of which is for the<add>useful<gap/></add> interest of those<lb/>nations, either originally, as tending in itself<lb/>to produce<add>lust</add>impure pleasures & least<add><gap/>added text</add> pains <lb/>whatever men expect about the<gap/>; or<lb/>,be merely because they expect it.<lb/>I will give examples of these two different<lb/>parts of utility (different that is only as flowing<lb/>from on different sources for utility in itself<lb/>must ever be the same) utility <hi rend='underline'>original</hi> &<lb/>utility from expectation<lb/><p>There is a custom among European nations<lb/>that a <gap/><del>deleted text</del><gap/><del>of our nation </del> approaching <lb/>to a fort <add>belonging to</add>of another <del>nation</del><add>is utility itself</add> shall salute with a certain number of guns.<lb/><p>Now certain & plain it is, that in the freedom<lb/><sic>cing</sic> of a certain quantity of <gap/> and<lb/>which there can be no original utility:</p><pb/><p>It ought be called the <hi rend='underline'>Morality of nations.</hi></p><lb/><del>Solon</del> Selden and Grotius had their dispute<lb/>concerning the dominion of <del>their</del> certain seas,<lb/> they compiled Histories upon Histories to<lb/> , here the increase of it in that one or<lb/> the other of their farther <gap/>.<lb/><p> Why? but that they <add>both</add> perceived that if one<lb/> had been wind a certain number of<lb/>  times to make use of it along with others<lb/> he would reckon <add>upon</add> <gap/> the being suffered<lb/> to do so still: that if alone without this<lb/> he would in the same' manner expect to <lb/> do so still _ That these several facts if<lb/> admitted would come at once as grounds of<lb/> & <del> for expectations of</del><gap/><del><gap/>deleted text<del>deleted text</del></del><add>much</add> an expectation considered<lb/></p>


[x/presumption of] such an expectation considered
<head>INTRODUCTION<del>S</del>. LAW of NATIONS. no Law.</head>
as probably) and as incidences[?] of it, (considered as actual) that if [/either] one party [/that the other] entertained such [imperfect?] expectations [deleted text] ... exclusion or ... imply common ejoyment, or the one more strongly than the other, it could be the first that would suffer most by the being deprived of it that [/it was] therefore [/by] its being shall find[?] in proportion of it created[?] be the means of preserving the greatest quantity [continued on next page] of happiness, in the world upon the whole, in other words that it would be most expedient to general utility. when the common notion, that [/by being acknowledged] custom, nobody [has?]
 
Law, is constitutive of a right, laying the other party
<p>The Law of nations is nothing more than a<lb/>system of rules declaring concerning the conduct<lb/>of nations with respect to each other; rules<lb/>the practise of which is for the <add>useful / advantageous</add> interest of those<lb/>nations, either originally, as tending in itself<lb/>to produce <add>lust</add> impure pleasures and least <add>pure pains</add> pains <lb/>whatever men expect about the matter; or<lb/> else merely because they expect it.</p>
(according to the [/obscured] confused  phonology[?] of jurists)
 
under a moral necessity[?] of distributing [disturbing?] the exer[?]
<p>I will give examples of these two different<lb/>sorts of utility (different that is only as flowing<lb/>from on different sources for utility in itself<lb/>must ever be the same) utility <hi rend='underline'>original</hi> and<lb/>utility from expectation.</p>
cise[?] of it
 
<p>There is a custom among European Nations<lb/>that a <del>Ship</del> Vessel of our nation </del> approaching <lb/>to a Fort <add>belonging to</add> of another <del>nation</del> <add>at amity with it</add> shall salute with a certain number of guns.</p>
 
<p>Now certain and plain it is, that in the <lb/> producing of a certain quantity of noise and<lb/> Ship there can be no original utility:</p>
 
<p>It ought be called the <hi rend='underline'>Morality of Nations.</hi><lb/>
<del>When</del> Selden and Grotius had <add>in</add> their dispute<lb/>concerning the dominion of <del>their</del> certain seas,<lb/> they compiled Histories upon Histories to<lb/>, here the increase of it in that one or<lb/> the other of parties <gap/>.</p>


Law of [BR]] Nations no distinct Law - it's double Sense
<p>Why? but that they <add>both</add> perceived that if one<lb/> had been used a certain number of<lb/> times to make use of it along with others<lb/> he would reckon <add>upon</add> <gap/> the being suffered<lb/> to do so still: that if alone without this<lb/> he would in the same manner expect to <lb/> do so still.&#x2014;That these several facts if<lb/> admitted would come at once as grounds of<lb/> and <del>for expectations of</del><gap/>
<del><gap/>deleted text<del>deleted text</del></del><add>much</add> an expectation considered.
<lb/> as probable) and as evidences of it, (considered as actual,)<lb/>
that if <add>either</add> one party <add>and not the other</add> understood such <lb/>respective expectations, <del>it would accordingly</del> <add>either / whether / of exclusion or</add><lb/> common enjoyment, or the one more strongly<lb/> than the other, it could be the first that would suffer most by the being deprived of it<lb/>
that <add>it was</add> therefore <add>by</add> its being still in possession of it would<lb/> in possession if it would be the means of preserving the greatest quantity</p>


[POSTEMA'S TRANSCRIPTION: "’There is a custom among European nations that a vessel approach to a fort belonging to another nation shall salute it with a certain number of guns. Now certain and plain it is, that in the producing of a certain quantity of noise and smoke there can be no original utility: and yet utility there is. Why? because it {the salute} is expected.’ … ‘Selden and Grotius had their dispute concerning the dominion of certain laws. They compiled Histories upon Histories to show the exercise of it {…} Why? but that they both perceived that if one party had been used a certain number of times to make use of it along with others, he would reckon upon and expect the being suffered to do so still {… and} that these several facts if admitted would serve at once as grounds of such an expectation (considered as probable) and as indices of it (considered as actual)'" (Common Law Tradition, 152)]
<note>and the world<lb/>
would be presumed<lb/>
<gap/></note>


<pb/>
<p>Law of Nations. No Law.</p>


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>of happiness, in the world upon the whole, in other words that it would be most expedient to general utility. when the common notion, that [/by being acknowledged] custom, nobody [has?]
Law, is constitutive of a right, laying the other party
(according to the [/obscured] confused  phonology[?] of jurists)
under a moral necessity[?] of distributing [disturbing?] the exercise of it


<note>it prevents the<lb/>
mischiefs that<lb/>
might arise to<lb/>
both parties from<lb/>
suspicions of a<lb/>
contrary disposition.</note>


<p>Law of [BK][] Nations no distinct Law&#x2014;<sic>It's</sic> double Sense</p>


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 13:34, 15 October 2018

Click Here To Edit

INTRODUCTIONS. LAW of NATIONS. no Law.

The Law of nations is nothing more than a
system of rules declaring concerning the conduct
of nations with respect to each other; rules
the practise of which is for the useful / advantageous interest of those
nations, either originally, as tending in itself
to produce lust impure pleasures and least pure pains pains
whatever men expect about the matter; or
else merely because they expect it.

I will give examples of these two different
sorts of utility (different that is only as flowing
from on different sources for utility in itself
must ever be the same) utility original and
utility from expectation.

There is a custom among European Nations
that a Ship Vessel of our nation approaching
to a Fort belonging to of another nation at amity with it shall salute with a certain number of guns.

Now certain and plain it is, that in the
producing of a certain quantity of noise and
Ship there can be no original utility:

It ought be called the Morality of Nations.
When Selden and Grotius had in their dispute
concerning the dominion of their certain seas,
they compiled Histories upon Histories to
, here the increase of it in that one or
the other of parties .

Why? but that they both perceived that if one
had been used a certain number of
times to make use of it along with others
he would reckon upon the being suffered
to do so still: that if alone without this
he would in the same manner expect to
do so still.—That these several facts if
admitted would come at once as grounds of
and for expectations of deleted textdeleted textmuch an expectation considered.
as probable) and as evidences of it, (considered as actual,)
that if either one party and not the other understood such
respective expectations, it would accordingly either / whether / of exclusion or
common enjoyment, or the one more strongly
than the other, it could be the first that would suffer most by the being deprived of it
that it was therefore by its being still in possession of it would
in possession if it would be the means of preserving the greatest quantity

and the world
would be presumed


---page break---

Law of Nations. No Law.

of happiness, in the world upon the whole, in other words that it would be most expedient to general utility. when the common notion, that [/by being acknowledged] custom, nobody [has?] Law, is constitutive of a right, laying the other party (according to the [/obscured] confused phonology[?] of jurists) under a moral necessity[?] of distributing [disturbing?] the exercise of it it prevents the
mischiefs that
might arise to
both parties from
suspicions of a
contrary disposition.

Law of [BK][] Nations no distinct Law—It's double Sense

This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet


Identifier: | JB/072/001/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 72.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

072

Main Headings

penal code

Folio number

001

Info in main headings field

introduction law of nations the law

Image

002

Titles

note

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [pro patria lion motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

23618

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in