JB/052/229/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/052/229/001: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 16: Line 16:


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 09:56, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet

Remedies rendering inflexible rules needless. 1. Obligation to ration-alize. 2. ... Judges sistitive and law emendative function is for of the moral rules laid down in the Code


[MN: substitive to infleixble rules.

Comst. Code. Ch. XII. Judiciary

27 In proposed Codes rules inflexible none. 28. Alteration allowed where preponderent good the result. 29. Judges allowed to add exceptions to rules but appropriate reasons required]



Identifier: | JB/052/229/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 52.

Date_1

1825-02

Marginal Summary Numbering

27-29

Box

052

Main Headings

procedure code

Folio number

229

Info in main headings field

procedure code

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d9 / e9

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

j whatman turkey mill 1824

Marginals

george bentham

Paper Producer

jonathan blenman

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1824

Notes public

ID Number

16902

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in