JB/014/309/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/014/309/001: Difference between revisions

RexL (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:


<head>1824 Dec. 3<lb/>
<head>1824 Dec. 3<lb/>
Deontology Private<lb/>
Deontology Private</head>
 
2<lb/></head>
 
<note>Beginning</note>


<note>§. Beginning</note>
<p>2</p>
<p>Prudence is <del>the choice of apt</del> in proportion to the aptitude<lb/>
<p>Prudence is <del>the choice of apt</del> in proportion to the aptitude<lb/>
of the choice made of means with reference to an <unclear>end</unclear>: that<lb/>
of the choice made of means with reference to an end: that<lb/>
end being happiness Subjects of <unclear>condition</unclear> self and all<lb/>
end being happiness. Subjects of consideration self and all<lb/>
others. Self-regarding prudence is the apt choice of men<lb/>
others. Self-regarding prudence is the apt choice of means<lb/>
with reference to the happiness of the chooser in a case in <lb/>
with reference to the happiness of the chooser in a case in<lb/>
which by whatsoever he <sic>chuse</sic> the happiness of no other sensible <add>sentient</add><lb/>
which by whatsoever he <sic>chuse</sic> the happiness of no other sensible <add>sentient</add><lb/>
being will be affected: extraregarding Prudence is the apt choice<lb/>
being will be affected: extra-regarding Prudence is the apt choice<lb/>
of <unclear>means</unclear> <!-- or "men"? -->with reference to that same <unclear>sent</unclear> to a <unclear>case</unclear> or<lb/>
of means with reference to that same end in a case or<lb/>
<gap/> by the course he takes -- by the course taken by the<lb/>
about by the course he takes&#x2014;by the course taken by the<lb/>
amount he gives to his <gap/> faculty, his happiness if<lb/>
amount he gives to his active faculty, the happiness of<lb/>
some other sensible being is in some way <add>shape</add> or other, in <unclear>some</unclear><lb/>
some other sensible being is in some way <add>shape</add> or other, in some<lb/>
degree or other affected.<lb/></p>
degree or other affected.</p>
 
<p>Take <add>the maximization of</add> your own happiness for the object of your endeavour:<lb/>
then say, every sentient being to himself: then say,<lb/>
every sentient being to itself: every sentiment which is at the same<lb/>
time an <hi rend="underline">agent</hi> being: in which case it seems probable that<lb/>
all are.</p>


<p>Take again <add>the maximization of</add> <unclear>an</unclear> happiness for the object of your endeavour:<lb/>
<p><del>First</del> earliest and most corporeal subject <del>end</del> of consideration<lb/>
then say, every human being to himself: then say,<lb/>
and object of endeavour must to every sentient being<lb/>
every sentient being to itself: every sentient which is at the <unclear>same</unclear><lb/>
be his own happiness. It can not be otherwise <del>every human</del><lb/>
time <unclear>an</unclear> <hi rend="underline">agent</hi> being: in which case it seems probable that<lb/>
<del>being is nearest. To</del> To no human <add>or other</add> being is any other<lb/>
all are</p>
so near as himself: to no human being are <add>is</add> any others<lb/>
<p>
so dear as himself. It is not deniable that <add>conducive to the happiness of each</add> it should be<lb/>
<del>That</del> <unclear>latest</unclear> and <unclear>most</unclear> <unclear>important</unclear> subject <del><unclear>and</unclear></del> of consideration<lb/>
otherwise.</p>
<unclear>and</unclear> object of <unclear>interest</unclear> must to every sentient being<lb/>
<unclear>be</unclear> his <unclear>own</unclear> happiness. It can not be otherwise <del>every human</del><lb/>
<del>being is nearest</del> <del>I</del> To no human <add>or other</add> being is any other <lb/>
so <unclear>near</unclear> as himself: to no human being <unclear>are</unclear> any others<lb/>
so dear as himself. It is not <unclear>damnable</unclear> <add><gap/> to the happiness of each</add> that it should be<lb/>
otherwise</p>


Had Adam cared more for the happiness of Eve<lb/>
<p>Had Adam cared more for the happiness of Eve<lb/>
than for his own,&#x2014;nor at the same time every man for the<lb/>
than for his own,&#x2014;Eve at the same time any more for the<lb/>
happiness of Adam than for <gap/>, Satan <del><gap/></del> would not<lb/>
happiness of Adam than for ours, Satan <del><gap/></del> would not<lb/>
have needed to give himself the trouble of temptation. <add><gap/></add> This very<lb/>
have needed to give himself the trouble of temptation. <add>Mental</add> Misery<lb/>
would have spared him <add>saved him from</add> the prospect of their happiness: or<lb/>
would have spared him <add>saved him from</add> the prospect of their happiness: or<lb/>
Death of both would have spared him <add>saved him from</add> the prospect of<lb/>
Death of both would have spared him <add>saved him from</add> the prospect of<lb/>
their existence<lb/>
their existence.</p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 17:17, 15 January 2018

Click Here To Edit

1824 Dec. 3
Deontology Private

§. Beginning

2

Prudence is the choice of apt in proportion to the aptitude
of the choice made of means with reference to an end: that
end being happiness. Subjects of consideration self and all
others. Self-regarding prudence is the apt choice of means
with reference to the happiness of the chooser in a case in
which by whatsoever he chuse the happiness of no other sensible sentient
being will be affected: extra-regarding Prudence is the apt choice
of means with reference to that same end in a case or
about by the course he takes—by the course taken by the
amount he gives to his active faculty, the happiness of
some other sensible being is in some way shape or other, in some
degree or other affected.

Take the maximization of your own happiness for the object of your endeavour:
then say, every sentient being to himself: then say,
every sentient being to itself: every sentiment which is at the same
time an agent being: in which case it seems probable that
all are.

First earliest and most corporeal subject end of consideration
and object of endeavour must to every sentient being
be his own happiness. It can not be otherwise every human
being is nearest. To To no human or other being is any other
so near as himself: to no human being are is any others
so dear as himself. It is not deniable that conducive to the happiness of each it should be
otherwise.

Had Adam cared more for the happiness of Eve
than for his own,—Eve at the same time any more for the
happiness of Adam than for ours, Satan would not
have needed to give himself the trouble of temptation. Mental Misery
would have spared him saved him from the prospect of their happiness: or
Death of both would have spared him saved him from the prospect of
their existence.



Identifier: | JB/014/309/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 14.

Date_1

1829-12-03

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

014

Main Headings

deontology

Folio number

309

Info in main headings field

deontology private

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e2

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

5072

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in