JB/541/460/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/541/460/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<!-- pencil addition --> <p> 1793. J.B. to Earl Spencer &amp; Archbishop of York</p> <p> By some papers I have been favoured with by<lb/> Sir Charles, I learn that when the negotiation was<lb/> first on your carpet, it was your Grace's <del>desire</del> <add> wish</add> that<lb/> whatsoever might be the purchase-money might<lb/> instead of <del>maki</del> being laid out in the purchase<lb/> of land to the same uses, <del>might</del> be divided<lb/> in <add>the</add> proper proportions between the See of York and<lb/> its Lessee.  A decision of <del>this</del> <add> that</add> nature <del>must</del> <add>can not</add> I<lb/> think but be greatly to the advantage of <del>be the parties</del> <add>all parties</add> <lb/><del>proprietors.</del> <add> interested</add>.  the fetters by which the property is bound<lb/> at present must I think lessen the value of it to<lb/> the proprietors without being of use to any body.<lb/> By a paper I was furnished with from the<lb/> Treasury, I find that at Your Grace's desire the<lb/> purchase-money was to have been vested in the<lb/> funds in the joint names if I recollect aright<lb/> of the archbishop of York and his Lessee, where<lb/> it would have remained subject to the discussion<lb/> relative to the partition in question: a partition<lb/> which <del>I am apt to</del> as it strikes me at the moment<lb/> could hardly <add> under the former Act</add> have been carried into effect without<lb/> a decree of the Court of Chancery.  Under the future<lb/>Act which will now be necessary; <del> this business may<lb/> be settled will <gap/> the <sic>expence</sic> and delay of a <add> inseparable</add><lb/> <gap/> in <gap/> <add> from such a decree</add> </del> that <sic>expence</sic> will be saved.<lb/> Archbishop of York. I am &amp;c</p>
<!-- pencil addition --> <p> 1793. J.B. to Earl Spencer &amp; Archbishop of York</p> <p> By some papers I have been favoured with by<lb/> Sir Charles, I learn that when the negotiation was<lb/> first on your carpet, it was your Grace's <del>desire</del> <add> wish</add> that<lb/> whatsoever might be the purchase-money might<lb/> instead of <del>maki</del> being laid out in the purchase<lb/> of land to the same uses, <del>might</del> be divided<lb/> in <add>the</add> proper proportions between the See of York and<lb/> its Lessee.  A decision of <del>this</del> <add> that</add> nature <del>must</del> <add>can not</add> I<lb/> think but be greatly to the advantage of <del>both parties</del> <add>all parties</add> <lb/><del>proprietors.</del> <add> interested</add>.  The fetters by which the property is bound<lb/> at present must I think lessen the value of it to<lb/> the proprietors without being of use to any body.<lb/> By a Paper I was furnished with from the<lb/> Treasury, I find that at Your Grace's desire the<lb/> purchase-money was to have been vested in the<lb/> funds in the joint names if I recollect aright<lb/> of the Archbishop of York and his Lessee, where<lb/> it would have remained subject to the discussion<lb/> relative to the partition in question: a partition<lb/> which <del>I am apt to</del> as it strikes me at the moment<lb/> could hardly <add> under the former Act</add> have been carried into effect without<lb/> a decree of the Court of Chancery.  Under the future<lb/>Act which will now be necessary; <del> this business may<lb/> be settled without the <sic>expence</sic> and delay of a <add> inseparable</add><lb/> <gap/> in <gap/> <add>from such a decree</add></del> that <sic>expence</sic> will be saved.<lb/> I am &amp;c <lb/>Archbishop of York.</p>





Revision as of 11:35, 5 February 2018

Click Here To Edit

1793. J.B. to Earl Spencer & Archbishop of York

By some papers I have been favoured with by
Sir Charles, I learn that when the negotiation was
first on your carpet, it was your Grace's desire wish that
whatsoever might be the purchase-money might
instead of maki being laid out in the purchase
of land to the same uses, might be divided
in the proper proportions between the See of York and
its Lessee. A decision of this that nature must can not I
think but be greatly to the advantage of both parties all parties
proprietors. interested. The fetters by which the property is bound
at present must I think lessen the value of it to
the proprietors without being of use to any body.
By a Paper I was furnished with from the
Treasury, I find that at Your Grace's desire the
purchase-money was to have been vested in the
funds in the joint names if I recollect aright
of the Archbishop of York and his Lessee, where
it would have remained subject to the discussion
relative to the partition in question: a partition
which I am apt to as it strikes me at the moment
could hardly under the former Act have been carried into effect without
a decree of the Court of Chancery. Under the future
Act which will now be necessary; this business may
be settled without the expence and delay of a inseparable
in from such a decree
that expence will be saved.
I am &c
Archbishop of York.




Identifier: | JB/541/460/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 541.

Date_1

1793-09-14

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

541

Main Headings

Folio number

460

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

Correspondence

Number of Pages

Recto/Verso

Page Numbering

Penner

Jeremy Bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in