★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<p> 1829 June 12 7<lb/> J.B. on Brougham's Speech</p> <p> (2) (7</p> <!-- notes in a different hand --> <p> <note> 9<lb/> Rule 1 All comprehensiveness<lb/> H.B.'s <del>speech</del> corresponding<lb/> rule p.112</note></p> <p> 1 Rule the first. <del>Rule of</del> <add> Principle is</add> all <hi rend="underline">comprehensiveness</hi>. <add>J.B.'s</add> Rule.<lb/>1 In the field of law, be your <add> plan of</add> reform all comprehensive <hi rend="superscript">(a)</hi> <lb/> H.B.'s rule. "But as the fundamental principles for which I<lb/> "contend is — to allow no part of the law by itself, or <gap/><lb/> "considering <hi rend="underline">all</hi> the <del>parts</del> other parts," <del>Plan</del> there can be<lb/> "no difficulty, consistently with this doctrine, to enlarge the<lb/> allowance of <hi rend="underline">costs</hi> as soon as <del><gap/></del> Place of this rule — the<lb/> 112<hi rend="superscript">th</hi> of 120 pages</p> <p><note>10<lb/> So again as to Bankrupt<lb/> dues</note></p> <p> Then again speaking of Bankrupt Law I saw<lb/> "Partial legislation on such a subject is pregnant with mischief" — <lb/> <hi rend="underline">'On such a subject'</hi>: here then to the all-comprehensive<lb/> rub laid down in the last proceeding page but <gap/> is<lb/> a virtual limitation, and <foreign><hi rend="underline">pro parte</hi></foreign> a contribution</p> <p><note> 11<lb/> | <p> 1829 June 12 7<lb/> J.B. on Brougham's Speech</p> <p> (2) (7</p> <!-- notes in a different hand --> <p> <note> 9<lb/> Rule 1 All comprehensiveness<lb/> H.B.'s <del>speech</del> corresponding<lb/> rule p.112</note></p> <p> 1 Rule the first. <del>Rule of</del> <add> Principle is</add> all <hi rend="underline">comprehensiveness</hi>. <add>J.B.'s</add> Rule.<lb/>1 In the field of law, be your <add> plan of</add> reform all comprehensive <hi rend="superscript">(a)</hi> <lb/> H.B.'s rule. "But as the fundamental principles for which I<lb/> "contend is — to allow no part of the law by itself, or <gap/><lb/> "considering <hi rend="underline">all</hi> the <del>parts</del> other parts," <del>Plan</del> there can be<lb/> "no difficulty, consistently with this doctrine, to enlarge the<lb/> allowance of <hi rend="underline">costs</hi> as soon as <del><gap/></del> Place of this rule — the<lb/> 112<hi rend="superscript">th</hi> of 120 pages</p> <p><note>10<lb/> So again as to Bankrupt<lb/> dues</note></p> <p> Then again speaking of Bankrupt Law I saw<lb/> "Partial legislation on such a subject is pregnant with mischief" — <lb/> <hi rend="underline">'On such a subject'</hi>: here then to the all-comprehensive<lb/> rub laid down in the last proceeding page but <gap/> is<lb/> a virtual limitation, and <foreign><hi rend="underline">pro parte</hi></foreign> a contribution</p> <p><note> 11<lb/> This the place for the<lb/> word edification</note></p> <p> Here would have been a place for the word edification<lb/> what <del> <gap/></del> by the theoretical pen now employing <add> at work <gap/></add> itself<lb/> on these pages eleven years ago hath been planted in the <lb/> language, and which all the frost what the God <add><gap/></add> of Islam<lb/> could bring to view upon it has not been able to kill and<lb/> eradicate to prevent from <gap/> the <del>sacred</del> <add> Gospel</add> <gap/></p> <p><note>12<lb/> J.B.'s rule applied<lb/> to written Pleadings</note></p> <p> Rule per J.B. When you have laid down a principle<lb/> if you add on Mr Brougham's <gap/> in <hi rend="underline">practice</hi>, that is to say<lb/> proposed arrangements having for their ground the principle, <gap/><lb/> give to your arrangements all together <del>the</del> <sic>bredth</sic> equal to that<lb/> of your principle: for as an intention to reform being the intention<lb/> professed, whatsoever you do not profess to abolish, you confirm<lb/> <del> 1. Measure for this rule non <gap/></del> non-continuation is approbation<lb/> <del>1. Whatever you do not abolish you confirm</del></p> <p> Apply this to Written Pleading. Of the <gap/> <gap/><lb/> with which Judge's sinister interest has covered the field of procedure<lb/> are of the tallest is that which bear Written Pleadings: the whole<lb/> growth from the meanest fibre of the root to the uppermost <gap/> <gap/><lb/> is opposition to this here rule. will the <gap/> <hi rend="underline">practice</hi> often, what does<lb/> <add>it</add><lb/> <!-- continues in margin --> it with the <gap/> <gap/>?<lb/> How it conducts it? <gap/><lb/> all that it does with it<lb/> as to <gap/>: cutting off<lb/> a trifling <gap/> or two,<lb/> <gap/> there giving the <gap/><lb/> former <gap/> to <del>all</del> <lb/> <!-- continues along the edge of the page --> every part <del> of which</del> <gap/> what nothing is said.</p> | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | ||
1829 June 12 7
J.B. on Brougham's Speech
(2) (7
9
Rule 1 All comprehensiveness
H.B.'s speech corresponding
rule p.112
1 Rule the first. Rule of Principle is all comprehensiveness. J.B.'s Rule.
1 In the field of law, be your plan of reform all comprehensive (a)
H.B.'s rule. "But as the fundamental principles for which I
"contend is — to allow no part of the law by itself, or
"considering all the parts other parts," Plan there can be
"no difficulty, consistently with this doctrine, to enlarge the
allowance of costs as soon as Place of this rule — the
112th of 120 pages
10
So again as to Bankrupt
dues
Then again speaking of Bankrupt Law I saw
"Partial legislation on such a subject is pregnant with mischief" —
'On such a subject': here then to the all-comprehensive
rub laid down in the last proceeding page but is
a virtual limitation, and pro parte a contribution
11
This the place for the
word edification
Here would have been a place for the word edification
what by the theoretical pen now employing at work itself
on these pages eleven years ago hath been planted in the
language, and which all the frost what the God of Islam
could bring to view upon it has not been able to kill and
eradicate to prevent from the sacred Gospel
12
J.B.'s rule applied
to written Pleadings
Rule per J.B. When you have laid down a principle
if you add on Mr Brougham's in practice, that is to say
proposed arrangements having for their ground the principle,
give to your arrangements all together the bredth equal to that
of your principle: for as an intention to reform being the intention
professed, whatsoever you do not profess to abolish, you confirm
1. Measure for this rule non non-continuation is approbation
1. Whatever you do not abolish you confirm
Apply this to Written Pleading. Of the
with which Judge's sinister interest has covered the field of procedure
are of the tallest is that which bear Written Pleadings: the whole
growth from the meanest fibre of the root to the uppermost
is opposition to this here rule. will the practice often, what does
it
it with the ?
How it conducts it?
all that it does with it
as to : cutting off
a trifling or two,
there giving the
former to all
every part of which what nothing is said.
|
Identifier: | JB/011/013/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 11. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1829-06-12 |
9-12 |
||
|
011 |
law amendment |
||
|
013 |
jb on brougham's speech |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
c2 / d7 / e7 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
|||
|
3710 |
|||
