JB/044/105/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/044/105/001: Difference between revisions

Jancopes (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


1829. Nov. 17. T 31<lb/><head>Constitutional Code.</head><p>Here then <add>to this body of men who are wise by creation</add> in addition to the just mentioned share in<lb/>Legislative power is given a corresponding share of<lb/>administrative power: in the power of location &#x2014; in the power<lb/>of patronage: the President being endowed with the<lb/>remainder. Behold now <add><del>what follows</del></add> the consequence.</p><p>Number of members in this body, 40: majority requisite<lb/>and sufficient for this purpose. How then <del>is</del> <add>in</add> the instance of<lb/>each location is the matter to be settled? Discussing<lb/><hi rend="underline">toties quoties</hi> as between President and Senate as between<lb/>each of these 40 Senators and every other would be a most<lb/>tedious process: in the Senate more particularly<lb/>scarcely might the whole of the Official time <add>suffice</add> <del><gap/></del> it.<lb/>Incomparably <add>shorter</add> <del><gap/></del> and more convenient <add>would</add> <del>will</del> have been the<lb/>dividing the patronage between the two authorities: As to the <add>mino-</add> <del>majo-</del><lb/>rity, to wit 19, <add>they</add> having no power, the trouble of consideration<lb/>and discussion is a trouble from <add><del>of</del></add> which they may be<lb/><add>relieved.</add> <del>spared.</del> Remain the majority, 21: should it happen<lb/>that in a collision of wills, owing to any difference of <add>force</add> <del><gap/></del><lb/>as between will and will, a number more or less<lb/>exceeding that of the bare majority have been let into a share<lb/>in the mass of good things, the difference in ultimate effect<lb/>cannot be very considerable. Patronage, to be worth any thing must<lb/>have at least an office for the subject matter of it. Here<lb/>then <add>on</add> <del>is</del> the <add>supposition</add> <del>subject</del> of an equitable and mutually commodious<lb/>plan of partition &#x2014; <add>here we</add> <del><gap/></del> have for each one of the<lb/>majority of the Senate (say 21) one officer together 21 Offices:<lb/><add>number remaining</add> <del>remains</del> for the President &#x2014; (this number must unavoidably<lb/>be left in blank): the number that may actually<lb/>have been agreed upon and acted upon bids defiance<lb/>to conjecture: it will have depended upon comparative<lb/>strength of will as between one side and the other.</p>
<head>Constitutional Code.</head>
 
<p>1829. Nov. 17. T 31</p>
 
<p>Here then <add>to this body of men who are wise by creation</add> in addition to the just mentioned share in<lb/>Legislative power is given a corresponding share of<lb/>administrative power: in the power of location &#x2014; in the power<lb/>of patronage: the President being endowed with the<lb/>remainder. Behold now <add><del>what follows</del></add> the consequence.</p><p>Number of members in this body, 40: majority requisite<lb/>and sufficient for this purpose. How then <del>is</del> <add>in</add> the instance of<lb/>each location is the matter to be settled? Discussing<lb/><hi rend="underline">toties quoties</hi> as between President and Senate as between<lb/>each of these 40 Senators and every other would be a most<lb/>tedious process: in the Senate more particularly<lb/>scarcely might the whole of the Official time <add>suffice</add> <del><gap/></del> for it.<lb/>Incomparably <add>shorter</add> <del><gap/></del> and more convenient <add>would</add> <del>will</del> have been the<lb/>dividing the patronage between the two authorities: As to the <add>mino-</add> <del>majo-</del><lb/>rity, to wit 19, <add>they</add> having no power, the trouble of consideration<lb/>and discussion is a trouble from <add><del>of</del></add> which they may be<lb/><add>relieved.</add> <del>spared.</del> Remain the majority, 21: should it happen<lb/>that in a collision of wills, owing to any difference of <add>force</add> <del><gap/></del><lb/>as between will and will, a number more or less<lb/>exceeding that of the bare majority have been let into a share<lb/>in the mass of good things, the difference in ultimate effect<lb/>cannot be very considerable. Patronage, to be worth any thing must<lb/>have at least an office for the subject matter of it. Here<lb/>then <add>on</add> <del>is</del> the <add>supposition</add> <del>subject</del> of an equitable and mutually commodious<lb/>plan of partition &#x2014; <add>here we</add> <del><gap/></del> have for each one of the<lb/>majority of the Senate (say 21) one officer together 21 Offices:<lb/><add>number remaining</add> <del>remains</del> for the President &#x2014; (this number must unavoidably<lb/>be left in blank): the number that may actually<lb/>have been agreed upon and acted upon bids defiance<lb/>to conjecture: it will have depended upon comparative<lb/>strength of will as between one side and the other.</p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 10:51, 9 April 2018

Click Here To Edit

Constitutional Code.

1829. Nov. 17. T 31

Here then to this body of men who are wise by creation in addition to the just mentioned share in
Legislative power is given a corresponding share of
administrative power: in the power of location — in the power
of patronage: the President being endowed with the
remainder. Behold now what follows the consequence.

Number of members in this body, 40: majority requisite
and sufficient for this purpose. How then is in the instance of
each location is the matter to be settled? Discussing
toties quoties as between President and Senate as between
each of these 40 Senators and every other would be a most
tedious process: in the Senate more particularly
scarcely might the whole of the Official time suffice for it.
Incomparably shorter and more convenient would will have been the
dividing the patronage between the two authorities: As to the mino- majo-
rity, to wit 19, they having no power, the trouble of consideration
and discussion is a trouble from of which they may be
relieved. spared. Remain the majority, 21: should it happen
that in a collision of wills, owing to any difference of force
as between will and will, a number more or less
exceeding that of the bare majority have been let into a share
in the mass of good things, the difference in ultimate effect
cannot be very considerable. Patronage, to be worth any thing must
have at least an office for the subject matter of it. Here
then on is the supposition subject of an equitable and mutually commodious
plan of partition — here we have for each one of the
majority of the Senate (say 21) one officer together 21 Offices:
number remaining remains for the President — (this number must unavoidably
be left in blank): the number that may actually
have been agreed upon and acted upon bids defiance
to conjecture: it will have depended upon comparative
strength of will as between one side and the other.



Identifier: | JB/044/105/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 44.

Date_1

1829-11-17

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

044

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

105

Info in main headings field

constitutional code

Image

001

Titles

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f31

Penner

Watermarks

b&m 1829

Marginals

Paper Producer

arthur moore; richard doane

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1829

Notes public

ID Number

13890

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in