★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
1822 <gap/> March 5 + | <p>1822 <gap/> March 5 +</p> | ||
Codification Offer | <head>Codification Offer</head> | ||
§.8. <gap/> <gap/> | <note>§.8. <gap/> <gap/></note> | ||
6 | <p>6</p> | ||
The remainder of this page and the margin have been crossed out | <!-- The remainder of this page and the margin have been crossed out --> | ||
Of all these cases, the two most likely apt to be exemplified, | <p>Of all these cases, the two most likely <del><add>apt</add></del> to be exemplified,<lb/> | ||
and in fact the two most frequently exemplified | and in fact the two most frequently exemplified<lb/> | ||
are the second and the fifth: from the consideration of | are the second and the fifth: from the consideration of<lb/> | ||
these two the influence exercised on <gap/> of the draught, | these two the influence exercised <del>on <gap/> of the draught,</del><lb/> | ||
with reference to the greatest happiness of the greatest number | <del>with reference to the greatest happiness of the greatest number</del><lb/> | ||
by the two <gap/> circumstances in question will be of the <gap/> | by the <del>two <gap/></del> circumstances <add>in question will be</add> <del>of the <gap/></del><lb/> | ||
its <gap/> the ultimate efficiency of the <gap/> | <del>its <gap/> the ultimate efficiency of the <gap/></del><lb/> | ||
depends and of these <gap/><gap/> | <del>depends and of these <add><gap/></add> <gap/></del><lb/> | ||
first <gap/> | <del>first <gap/></del><lb/> | ||
sufficiently brought to view: what other < | sufficiently brought to view: what other variations <del>eff</del> <add>of effect</add><lb/> | ||
<gap/> any will be produced by the other | <del><gap/> <add>any</add></del> will be produced by the other<lb/> | ||
<gap/> of which the <gap/> | <del><gap/> of which the <gap/></del><lb/> | ||
<gap/> | <del><gap/></del><lb/> | ||
<gap/> | <del><gap/></del><lb/> | ||
little <gap/> danger of error <gap/> | <del>little <gap/> danger of error <gap/></del><lb/> | ||
there. | <del>there.</del></p> | ||
So far as regards | <note><del>13</del> 10<lb/> | ||
the | Cases most naturally<lb/> | ||
and frequently exemplified,<lb/> | |||
to <gap/> have been concerned in it is a circumstance | <gap/><lb/> | ||
that makes no difference. But in comparison | from this <gap/> the influence<lb/> | ||
of <gap/> those patrons of aptitude what <gap/> on the part of the | of numbers in<lb/> | ||
depend upon appropriate moral aptitude and | the composition of the<lb/> | ||
on the <gap/> part of the | draught, will be <gap/><lb/> | ||
any <gap/> imperfection <gap/> likely to be produced | bring it devices:<lb/> | ||
by | from these<lb/> | ||
of these being supposed apt <gap/> with reference to its own part of the field, | <unclear>variantions</unclear> <add>deduce</add> the others.</note> | ||
is a minor object. | |||
<p>So far as regards consistency, true it is that if<lb/> | |||
the work be really the work of no more than one<lb/> | |||
workman, what may have been the number <hi rend="underline">supposed</hi><lb/> | |||
to <del><gap/></del> have been concerned in it is a circumstance<lb/> | |||
that makes no difference. But in <unclear>comparison</unclear><lb/> | |||
of <del><gap/></del> <add>those <unclear>patrons</unclear> of</add> aptitude <del>what <gap/></del> <add>on the part of</add> the <unclear>work</unclear> which<lb/> | |||
depend upon <add>appropriate</add> moral aptitude and thence upon responsibility<lb/> | |||
on the <del><add><gap/></add></del> part of the workman, <del><gap/></del> <add>as above,</add><lb/> | |||
any <del><gap/></del> imperfection <del><gap/></del> likely to be produced<lb/> | |||
by mere <del>inconsistency</del> <add>want of consistency</add> as between <del>the <gap/></del><lb/> | |||
<del>different parts</del> one part of the work and another, each<lb/> | |||
of these being supposed apt <del><gap/></del> <add>with reference to</add> its own part of the field,<lb/> | |||
is a <unclear>minor</unclear> object.</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} |
1822 March 5 +
Codification Offer §.8.
6
Of all these cases, the two most likely apt to be exemplified,
and in fact the two most frequently exemplified
are the second and the fifth: from the consideration of
these two the influence exercised on of the draught,
with reference to the greatest happiness of the greatest number
by the two circumstances in question will be of the
its the ultimate efficiency of the
depends and of these
first
sufficiently brought to view: what other variations eff of effect
any will be produced by the other
of which the
little danger of error
there.
13 10
Cases most naturally
and frequently exemplified,
from this the influence
of numbers in
the composition of the
draught, will be
bring it devices:
from these
variantions deduce the others.
So far as regards consistency, true it is that if
the work be really the work of no more than one
workman, what may have been the number supposed
to have been concerned in it is a circumstance
that makes no difference. But in comparison
of those patrons of aptitude what on the part of the work which
depend upon appropriate moral aptitude and thence upon responsibility
on the part of the workman, as above,
any imperfection likely to be produced
by mere inconsistency want of consistency as between the
different parts one part of the work and another, each
of these being supposed apt with reference to its own part of the field,
is a minor object.
Identifier: | JB/012/068/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 12. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1822-05-31 |
|||
012 |
|||
068 |
to general sn martin |
||
002 |
|||
correspondence |
1 |
||
recto |
e4 |
||
jeremy bentham |
|||
letter 2891, vol. 11 |
4129 |
||