JB/104/054/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/104/054/001: Difference between revisions

Phil.fawcet (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<head>Fallacies</head>
<p>8 Aug 1811 8</p>
<p>8 Aug 1811 8</p>
<head>Fallacies</head>
<note>Ch. Classification</note>
<note>Ch. Classification</note>
<p>8</p>
<p>The affections &#x2014; the imagination &#x2014; the judgment &#x2014;<lb/>
these departments of the mind had been sufficiently<lb/>
marked out <add>characterized</add> <add>distinguished</add>, and by their very names <add>and were sufficiently well known</add> to exempt<lb/>
them from the need of looking <add>receiving</add> for other more<lb/>
convenient appellations to a <add>dead and</add> foreign language.</p>
<p>This at least it would have been stood <add>would have been the case</add> with them<lb/>
if mere conception <add>conveyance of the ideas in question</add> <add>communication</add> had been the object.</p>


<note>15<lb/>
<note>15<lb/>
Line 29: Line 18:
for conception</note>
for conception</note>


<p>But besides that <del>by</del> <add>in the instance of</add> the term <del>affections</del> <hi rend="underline">the affections</hi><lb/>
<p>8</p>
the class marked out by it was so extensive, as to<lb/>
<p>The affections &#x2014; the imagination &#x2014; the judgment &#x2014;<lb/>
stand in need of ulterior division, so it was that<lb/>
these departments of the mind had been sufficiently<lb/>
for retention on the part of the idea, and thence for<lb/>
marked out <add>characterized</add> <add>distinguished</add>, and by their very names <add>and were sufficiently well known</add> to exempt<lb/>
prominence on the part of the denomination <add>appellation</add>, <del>the</del><lb/>
them from the need of looking <add>receiving</add> for other more<lb/>
a <del>still</del> demand still seemed to present itself for the<lb/>
convenient appellations to a <add>dead and</add> foreign language.</p>
use of the dead but nevertheless <add>still</add> <del><add>generally</add></del> <add>sufficiently</add> familiar language<lb/>
 
still seemed to present itself.] and the example of<lb/>
<p>This at least it would have been stood <add>would have been the case</add> with them<lb/>
Locke sufficed at any rate to exempt <add>protect</add> <add><gap/></add> the whole<lb/>
if mere conception <add>conveyance of the ideas in question</add> <add>communication</add> had been the object.</p>
tribe of appellations <del><gap/></del> <add>formed</add> upon this principle from<lb/>
every such charge as that of affectation and <add>or</add> useless<lb/>
pedantry.</p>


<note>16<lb/>
<note>16<lb/>
Line 58: Line 44:
thus formed stand<lb/>
thus formed stand<lb/>
exculpated by Locke.</note>
exculpated by Locke.</note>
<p>But besides that <del>by</del> <add>in the instance of</add> the term <del>affections</del> <hi rend="underline">the affections</hi><lb/>
the class marked out by it was so extensive, as to<lb/>
stand in need of ulterior division, so it was that<lb/>
for retention on the part of the idea, and thence for<lb/>
prominence on the part of the denomination <add>appellation</add>, <del>the</del><lb/>
a <del>still</del> demand still seemed to present itself for the<lb/>
use of the dead but nevertheless <add>still</add> <del><add>generally</add></del> <add>sufficiently</add> familiar language<lb/>
still seemed to present itself.] and the example of<lb/>
Locke sufficed at any rate to exempt <add>protect</add> <add><gap/></add> the whole<lb/>
tribe of appellations <del><gap/></del> <add>formed</add> upon this principle from<lb/>
every such charge as that of affectation and <add>or</add> useless<lb/>
pedantry.</p>


<note>16<hi rend="superscript">(a)</hi><lb/>
<note>16<hi rend="superscript">(a)</hi><lb/>
Translated into English<lb/>
Translated into English<lb/>
these <sic>latin</sic> appellations<lb/>
these Latin appellations<lb/>
would be found too long-winded<lb/>
would be found too long-winded<lb/>
to be serviceable</note>
to be serviceable.</note>
 
 


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 12:34, 17 April 2018

Click Here To Edit

Fallacies

8 Aug 1811 8

Ch. Classification

15
Arguments addressed
to 1. the affection
2. the imagination
3. the judgment —
for prominence
these denominations
stand not in need of
latin: — at least
for conception

8

The affections — the imagination — the judgment —
these departments of the mind had been sufficiently
marked out characterized distinguished, and by their very names and were sufficiently well known to exempt
them from the need of looking receiving for other more
convenient appellations to a dead and foreign language.

This at least it would have been stood would have been the case with them
if mere conception conveyance of the ideas in question communication had been the object.

16
But the class ad
affectus
requiring from
its extent ulterior
division, the above
divisions suffice not
thence for retentive
thought but upon the
whole to put all into
the dead yet sufficiently
familiar language
from the charge of
affectation the
set of appellations
thus formed stand
exculpated by Locke.

But besides that by in the instance of the term affections the affections
the class marked out by it was so extensive, as to
stand in need of ulterior division, so it was that
for retention on the part of the idea, and thence for
prominence on the part of the denomination appellation, the
a still demand still seemed to present itself for the
use of the dead but nevertheless still generally sufficiently familiar language
still seemed to present itself.] and the example of
Locke sufficed at any rate to exempt protect the whole
tribe of appellations formed upon this principle from
every such charge as that of affectation and or useless
pedantry.

16(a)
Translated into English
these Latin appellations
would be found too long-winded
to be serviceable.



Identifier: | JB/104/054/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 104.

Date_1

1811-08-08

Marginal Summary Numbering

15-16, 16a

Box

104

Main Headings

fallacies

Folio number

054

Info in main headings field

fallacies

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d8 / e8

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

j whatman 1808

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

admiral pavel chichagov

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1808

Notes public

ID Number

34025

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in