JB/141/054/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/141/054/001: Difference between revisions

Lauraterry (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<note>13.II Ch. II.</note><lb/>
<note>B. II. Ch. II.</note>
<lb/>
<p>The second has been rarely <del><gap/></del> employed in the<lb/>
The second have been rarely <del><gap/></del> employed in the<lb/>
last century&#x2014;In the works of Pope &amp; his<lb/>
last century - In the works of Pope &amp; his <lb/>
contemporary writers may be seen how far their<lb/>
contemporary writers may be seen how far their<lb/>
<note><gap/></note> malignity was pleased by allusions to this species<lb/>
<note><gap/></note> malignity was pleased by allusions to this species<lb/>
of punishment which had been applied to the<lb/>
of punishment which had been applied to the<lb/>
author of a libel in these times<lb/>
author of a libel in those times.</p>
<lb/>
<p>The cutting off and slitting of the <lb/>
The cutting off and slitting of the <lb/>
nose the eyelids &amp; the Ears were <add>once</add> in common<lb/>
nose the eyelids &amp; the Ears were <hi rend="superscript">once</hi> in common<lb/>
use in Russia without distinction of sex or rank.<lb/>
use in Russia without distinction of sex or rank<lb/>
They were the common accompaniments of the<lb/>
They were the common accompaniments of the<lb/>
<gap/> and Exile: but it ought to be observed<lb/>
<gap/> and Exile: but it ought to be observed<lb/>
that the punishment of death was very rare.<lb/>
that the punishment of death was very rare.</p>
<lb/>
<p>Second Section</p>
<head>Second Section</head>
<p>Of <hi rend="superscript">Disablement or</hi> Punishments consisting in disabling an<lb/>
<lb/>
organ.&#x2014;</p>
Of <hi rend="superscript">Disablement or</hi> Punishments consisting in disabling an<lb/>
<p>To disable an organ is either to<lb/>
organ.-<lb/>
To disable an organ is either to<lb/>
suspend or destroy its use without destroying<lb/>
suspend or destroy its use without destroying<lb/>
the organ itself - <lb/>
the organ itself&#x2014;</p>
It is not necessary here to <unclear>enumerate</unclear><lb/>
<p>It is not necessary here to enumerate<lb/>
all the organs, nor all the methods by which<lb/>
all the organs, nor all the methods by which<lb/>
they <hi rend="superscript">may be rendered useless</hi> - We have already seen that it would <hi rend="superscript">not</hi> be<lb/>
they <add>may be rendered useless</add>.&#x2014;We have already seen that it would <hi rend="superscript">not</hi> be<lb/>
useful to have recourse to a great variety<lb/>
useful to have recourse to a great variety<lb/>
of afflictive punishments and that these would<lb/>
of afflictive punishments and that these would<lb/>
be many inconveniences in so doing:- If we<lb/>
be many inconveniences in so doing:&#x2014;If we<lb/>
were to follow the law of <unclear>retaliation</unclear> the<lb/>
were to follow the law of retaliation the<lb/>
catalogue of possible punishments would be the<lb/>
catalogue of possible punishments would be the<lb/>
<note>same</note> as that of the possible offences of this kind.<lb/>
same as that of the possible offences of this kind.</p>
1. <hi rend="underline">The visual organ.</hi>- The use of a <gap/> may be<lb/>
<p>1. <hi rend="underline">The visual organ.</hi>&#x2014;The use of which may be<lb/>
suspended by <del>the</del> <unclear>chemical</unclear> applications or by<lb/>
suspended by <del>the</del> <sic>chymical</sic> applications or by<lb/>
mechanical means as with a mask or bandage.<lb/>
mechanical means as with a mask or bandage.</p>





Revision as of 11:56, 2 May 2018

Click Here To Edit

B. II. Ch. II.

The second has been rarely employed in the
last century—In the works of Pope & his
contemporary writers may be seen how far their
malignity was pleased by allusions to this species
of punishment which had been applied to the
author of a libel in those times.

The cutting off and slitting of the
nose the eyelids & the Ears were once in common
use in Russia without distinction of sex or rank.
They were the common accompaniments of the
and Exile: but it ought to be observed
that the punishment of death was very rare.

Second Section

Of Disablement or Punishments consisting in disabling an
organ.—

To disable an organ is either to
suspend or destroy its use without destroying
the organ itself—

It is not necessary here to enumerate
all the organs, nor all the methods by which
they may be rendered useless.—We have already seen that it would not be
useful to have recourse to a great variety
of afflictive punishments and that these would
be many inconveniences in so doing:—If we
were to follow the law of retaliation the
catalogue of possible punishments would be the
same as that of the possible offences of this kind.

1. The visual organ.—The use of which may be
suspended by the chymical applications or by
mechanical means as with a mask or bandage.




Identifier: | JB/141/054/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 141.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

141

Main Headings

rationale of punishment

Folio number

054

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f5 / f7

Penner

richard smith

Watermarks

dusautoy & rump 1809

Marginals

Paper Producer

edward collins

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1809

Notes public

ID Number

48271

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in