JB/169/243/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/169/243/002: Difference between revisions

Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<p><del>The probity <add>rectitude</add> of his intentions is not as much <add>therefore char<add>stands, therefore<add><gap/>fied</add></add></add></del><lb/>
<p><del>The probity <add>rectitude</add> of his intentions is not as much <add><del>therefore char<add></del><add><del>stands, therefore</del><add><del><gap/>fied</del></add></add></add><lb/>
<del><add>from the institution of that out of</add> as alloyed by any of that idle <add><gap/><add><gap/> after</add></add> forwardness with which</del><lb/>
<add><del>from the institution of that out of</del></add> <del>as alloyed by any of that idle</del> <add><del><gap/></del><add><del><gap/> after</add></del></add> <del>forwardness with which</del><lb/>
<del>probit good the least intention as not unapt</del><lb/>
<del>probit good the least intention as not unapt</del><lb/>
<del>to be alloyed.</del></p>
<del>to be alloyed.</del></p>
<p>There is a sort of <add>overweaning <del><gap/></del> forwardness</add> <del>idle forward presumptiousness</del><lb/>
with which the <del>present</del><add>best</add> <unclear>impressions</unclear> are not unapt to<lb/>
be alloyed &#x2014; but even this imputation, v<gap/>al<lb/>
<note>[+] you will now<lb/>
I hope, be of opinion<lb/>
with me, does</note> as it is <add>[+] <del>would</del></add> <del>does</del> not attract upon the conduct<lb/>
of M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Vaughan.</p>
<p>One <del>question</del><add>word</add> more Sir, and I have done.<lb/>
What <del>is to</del><add>would</add> become of the live of our country<lb/>
and of the country itself, ( I would <del>be glad to know</del><add>wish it to be considered</add>)<lb/>
if the same censure <del>is to involve <gap/> who</del> <add><gap/> understood to be in store for </add><lb/>
<del>labours to serve</del> the most <add><del>active</del> zealous</add> of its friends<lb/>
and the most <unclear>malitious</unclear> of its enemies?</p>





Revision as of 20:13, 1 April 2018

Click Here To Edit

The probity rectitude of his intentions is not as much <add>therefore char<add>stands, therefore<add>fied</add></add>
from the institution of that out of as alloyed by any of that idle <add> after</add> forwardness with which
probit good the least intention as not unapt
to be alloyed.

There is a sort of overweaning forwardness idle forward presumptiousness
with which the presentbest impressions are not unapt to
be alloyed — but even this imputation, val
[+] you will now
I hope, be of opinion
with me, does
as it is [+] would does not attract upon the conduct
of Mr Vaughan.

One questionword more Sir, and I have done.
What is towould become of the live of our country
and of the country itself, ( I would be glad to knowwish it to be considered)
if the same censure is to involve who understood to be in store for
labours to serve the most active zealous of its friends
and the most malitious of its enemies?




Identifier: | JB/169/243/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 169.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

169

Main Headings

Folio number

243

Info in main headings field

Image

002

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d13 /

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

57063

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in