JB/011/058/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/011/058/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<p> 1829 Aug. 3</p> <head>Reformists reviewed</head> <p> <!-- pencil addition --> <note>Beginning</note></p> <p> <!-- number in pencil --> (9 <note> <del>procedure</del> <add> J.B.</add><lb/><!-- number in pencil --> 20<lb/> Judges dealing with <lb/> the parties instead<lb/> of with their attorney &#x2014;<lb/> advantages</note></p> <p> Dealing with parties the Judges and their <gap/> <gap/><lb/> had to deal with persons whose interest was opposite<lb/> to theirs.  <del>H</del> the interest of Judges required that the <gap/> should <lb/> be fluid:  the interest of the <gap/> required that pardons should not be<lb/> <gap/>.  <del>if by any man it</del> In so far as things could be ordered<lb/> in such sort that parties instead of doing their own business themselves<lb/> should employ substitutes to do it for them, <add> assistants to do it with them in what way <gap/> like</add> Judges by entering<lb/> into a virtual partnership with these assistants or their substitutes<lb/> would meet at one or more <add> <unclear>delectable</add> chambers </unclear> to their <gap/><lb/> and <gap/> cases.  In <add> By</dad> so far as their assistants and<lb/> substitutes could be brought into existence, this community of<lb/> interest followed <add> found itself</add> of course.  The greater the number of suits<lb/> an assistant of this sort <del>had been</del> employed in it, the greater was<lb/> his <gap/> the better was he qualified for his <gap/> as of its<lb/> succeeding <gap/>: the greater <add> <add><gap/><gap/></add> the number of these suits, <gap/> often<lb/>did he come in contact with the Judges and their abovementioned<lb/> substitutes, to <gap/> party were it possible that these communities<lb/> of interest (<gap/> interest will state to that of the public it<lb/> <del><gap/> be <gap/></del> might well be called) should for <add>by</add> a moment<lb/> be a secret. <hi rend="superscript">[+]</hi> <note> <hi rend="superscript">[+]</hi> the more the Judge<lb/> and their <gap/> gave, the<lb/> more the assistant of the<lb/> <gap/> gave: the name the<lb/> assistants of the <gap/><lb/> gave the more the Judges<lb/> and their <gap/> <lb/> the more all their <gap/> <lb/> <gap/> gave the more<lb/> the <gap/> lose.</note>  The <gap/> was obvious <add> followed of course</add> and unavoidable<lb/> they played into one another's hands.  Thus <gap/> <add>under the existing system <add> in <gap/> or state of things</add> is the <gap/><lb/> of the miserable <gap/>: enemies are all <add>natural enemies</add> are all to have to deal with,<lb/> all in <gap/> has let <gap/>: friends &#x2014; natural friends he has<lb/> none.  Not less decidedly nor under the existing system less <gap/><lb/> <del>no</del> <add>is</add> the interest of his <add> <gap/></add> assistants has <gap/> his<lb/> guardian in whose hand his fate reposes, than that of this<lb/> adversary in the suit, against the adverse interest of an adversary<lb/> so called he is upon his guard, and to a certain degree his<lb/> or his professed assistants or real assistants used a support<lb/> against the adverse interest of these his professed guardians<lb/> and supporters to he has no support.</p>  
<p> 1829 Aug. 3</p> <head>Reformists reviewed</head> <p> <!-- pencil addition --> <note>Beginning</note></p> <p> <!-- number in pencil --> (9 <note> <del>procedure</del> <add> J.B.</add><lb/><!-- number in pencil --> 20<lb/> Judges dealing with <lb/> the parties instead<lb/> of with their attorney &#x2014;<lb/> advantages</note></p> <p> Dealing with parties the Judges and their respective <gap/><lb/> had to deal with persons whose interests were opposite<lb/> to theirs.  <del>H</del> The interest of Judges required that the parties should <lb/> be <unclear>friends</unclear>:  the interest of the parties required that parties should not be<lb/> <unclear>friends</unclear>.  <del>If by any man it</del> In so far as things could be ordered<lb/> in such sort that parties instead of doing their own business themselves<lb/> should employ substitutes to do it for them, <add> assistants to do it with them in that way still better</add> Judges by entering<lb/> into a virtual partnership with these assistants or these substitutes<lb/> would meet at once a most <gap/> <add> debateable</add> addition to their <gap/><lb/> and <gap/> cases.  In <add> By</add> so far as their assistants and<lb/> substitutes could be brought into existence, this community of<lb/> interest followed <add> found itself</add> of course.  The greater the number of suits<lb/> an assistant of this sort <del>had been</del> employed in it, the greater was<lb/> his <gap/> the better was he qualified for his <gap/> as of its<lb/> succeeding <gap/>: the greater <add> <add><gap/><gap/></add> the number of these suits, the  often<lb/>did he come in contact with the Judges and their abovementioned<lb/> substitutes, to neither party were it possible that these communities<lb/> of interest (sensible interest will <unclear>state</unclear> to that of the public it<lb/> <del><gap/> being <gap/></del> might well be called) should for <add>by</add> a moment<lb/> be a secret. <hi rend="superscript">[+]</hi> <note> <hi rend="superscript">[+]</hi> The more the Judge<lb/> and their <gap/> gave, the<lb/> more the assistants of the<lb/> parties gave: the more the<lb/> assistants of the parties<lb/> gave the more the Judges<lb/> and their <gap/> gave<lb/> the more all these <gap/> <lb/> gave the more<lb/> the parties lose.</note>  The consequence was obvious <add> followed of course</add> and unavoidable<lb/> they played into one another's hands.  Thus <gap/> <add>under the existing system <add> in <gap/> or state of things</add> is the <gap/><lb/> of the miserable suitor: enemies are all <add>natural enemies</add> are all to have to deal with,<lb/> all in <gap/> has let <gap/>: friends &#x2014; natural friends he has<lb/> none.  Not less decidedly nor under the existing system less <gap/><lb/> <del>no</del> <add>is</add> the interest of his <add> <gap/></add> assistants his <gap/> his<lb/> guardian in whose hand his fate reposes, than that of this<lb/> adversary in the suit, against the adverse interest of an adversary<lb/> so called he is upon his guard, and to a certain degree his<lb/> or his professed assistants or real assistants used a support<lb/> against the adverse interest of these his professed guardians<lb/> and supporters he has no support.</p>  





Revision as of 10:08, 26 April 2018

Click Here To Edit

1829 Aug. 3

Reformists reviewed

Beginning

(9 procedure J.B.
20
Judges dealing with
the parties instead
of with their attorney —
advantages

Dealing with parties the Judges and their respective
had to deal with persons whose interests were opposite
to theirs. H The interest of Judges required that the parties should
be friends: the interest of the parties required that parties should not be
friends. If by any man it In so far as things could be ordered
in such sort that parties instead of doing their own business themselves
should employ substitutes to do it for them, assistants to do it with them in that way still better Judges by entering
into a virtual partnership with these assistants or these substitutes
would meet at once a most debateable addition to their
and cases. In By so far as their assistants and
substitutes could be brought into existence, this community of
interest followed found itself of course. The greater the number of suits
an assistant of this sort had been employed in it, the greater was
his the better was he qualified for his as of its
succeeding : the greater <add> the number of these suits, the often
did he come in contact with the Judges and their abovementioned
substitutes, to neither party were it possible that these communities
of interest (sensible interest will state to that of the public it
being might well be called) should for by a moment
be a secret. [+] [+] The more the Judge
and their gave, the
more the assistants of the
parties gave: the more the
assistants of the parties
gave the more the Judges
and their gave
the more all these
gave the more
the parties lose.
The consequence was obvious followed of course and unavoidable
they played into one another's hands. Thus under the existing system <add> in or state of things is the
of the miserable suitor: enemies are all natural enemies are all to have to deal with,
all in has let : friends — natural friends he has
none. Not less decidedly nor under the existing system less
no is the interest of his assistants his his
guardian in whose hand his fate reposes, than that of this
adversary in the suit, against the adverse interest of an adversary
so called he is upon his guard, and to a certain degree his
or his professed assistants or real assistants used a support
against the adverse interest of these his professed guardians
and supporters he has no support.




Identifier: | JB/011/058/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 11.

Date_1

1829-08-03

Marginal Summary Numbering

20

Box

011

Main Headings

law amendment

Folio number

058

Info in main headings field

reformists reviewed

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e9

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

3755

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in